[clang] [Clang][Sema] Don't delay the access check when computing implicit deletion (PR #210254)
Younan Zhang via cfe-commits
cfe-commits at lists.llvm.org
Wed Jul 22 04:23:04 PDT 2026
================
@@ -1612,6 +1613,16 @@ bool Sema::isMemberAccessibleForDeletion(CXXRecordDecl *NamingClass,
// Suppress diagnostics.
Entity.setDiag(Diag);
+ // Deletion checking can run while we are inside an enclosing
+ // delayed-diagnostics scope (e.g. when parsing a later declaration whose
+ // initializer requires explaining why a defaulted comparison operator is
+ // deleted). CheckAccess would then return AR_delayed, but the result must be
+ // known immediately here. Force an undelayed check, mirroring CheckEnableIf.
----------------
zyn0217 wrote:
```suggestion
// We don't want to delay access checking even we are inside an enclosing
// delayed-diagnostics scope (e.g. when parsing a later declaration whose
// initializer requires explaining why a defaulted comparison operator is
// deleted)
```
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/210254
More information about the cfe-commits
mailing list