[clang] [CIR] Fix assumption that 'curFn' is always a function in direct-call (PR #197766)

Erich Keane via cfe-commits cfe-commits at lists.llvm.org
Sat May 16 05:58:21 PDT 2026

Previous message: [clang] [clang] Strict enum coverage check in switches (PR #198041)
Next message: [clang] [CIR] Fix assumption that 'curFn' is always a function in direct-call (PR #197766)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

https://github.com/erichkeane edited https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/197766

Previous message: [clang] [clang] Strict enum coverage check in switches (PR #198041)
Next message: [clang] [CIR] Fix assumption that 'curFn' is always a function in direct-call (PR #197766)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

More information about the cfe-commits mailing list