[clang] [OpenACC] Fix invalid routine case where 'bind' didn't exist (PR #192270)

[Erich Keane via cfe-commits]

================
@@ -2416,35 +2416,38 @@ void SemaOpenACC::CheckRoutineDecl(SourceLocation DirLoc,
   }
 
   auto BindItr = llvm::find_if(Clauses, llvm::IsaPred<OpenACCBindClause>);
-  for (auto *A : NextParsedFDecl->attrs()) {
-    // OpenACC 3.3 2.15:
-    // If a procedure has a bind clause on both the declaration and definition
-    // than they both must bind to the same name.
-    if (auto *RA = dyn_cast<OpenACCRoutineDeclAttr>(A)) {
-      auto OtherBindItr =
-          llvm::find_if(RA->Clauses, llvm::IsaPred<OpenACCBindClause>);
-      if (OtherBindItr != RA->Clauses.end() &&
-          (*cast<OpenACCBindClause>(*BindItr)) !=
-              (*cast<OpenACCBindClause>(*OtherBindItr))) {
-        Diag((*BindItr)->getBeginLoc(), diag::err_acc_duplicate_unnamed_bind);
-        Diag((*OtherBindItr)->getEndLoc(), diag::note_acc_previous_clause_here)
-            << (*BindItr)->getClauseKind();
-        return;
+  if (BindItr != Clauses.end()) {
----------------
erichkeane wrote:

That would cause us to duplicate the code on 2454, which seemed like a worse decision than just tabbing in 1 more level.

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/192270