[clang] e0f5ad7 - [Clang] Fix handling of overloads differing only by constraints and ref-qualifiers (#192018)
via cfe-commits
cfe-commits at lists.llvm.org
Wed Apr 15 07:35:33 PDT 2026
Author: Corentin Jabot
Date: 2026-04-15T16:35:28+02:00
New Revision: e0f5ad74be2b2f127442f721c70c6753c41e6d8c
URL: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/e0f5ad74be2b2f127442f721c70c6753c41e6d8c
DIFF: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/e0f5ad74be2b2f127442f721c70c6753c41e6d8c.diff
LOG: [Clang] Fix handling of overloads differing only by constraints and ref-qualifiers (#192018)
We should only error about inconsistent qualifiers if the functions are
actually overloads.
Fixes #120812
Added:
Modified:
clang/docs/ReleaseNotes.rst
clang/lib/Sema/SemaOverload.cpp
clang/test/CXX/drs/cwg24xx.cpp
Removed:
################################################################################
diff --git a/clang/docs/ReleaseNotes.rst b/clang/docs/ReleaseNotes.rst
index 083bc696f2f79..dc1192bbbd3d7 100644
--- a/clang/docs/ReleaseNotes.rst
+++ b/clang/docs/ReleaseNotes.rst
@@ -444,6 +444,7 @@ Bug Fixes to C++ Support
- We no longer caches invalid variable specializations. (#GH132592)
- Fixed an incorrect template argument deduction when matching packs of template
template parameters when one of its parameters is also a pack. (#GH181166)
+- Clang no longer errors on overloads with
diff erent ref-qualifiers and constraints. (#GH120812)
- Fixed a crash when a default argument is passed to an explicit object parameter. (#GH176639)
- Fixed an alias template CTAD crash.
- Correctly diagnose uses of ``co_await`` / ``co_yield`` in the default argument of nested function declarations. (#GH98923)
diff --git a/clang/lib/Sema/SemaOverload.cpp b/clang/lib/Sema/SemaOverload.cpp
index 11e771bc240f1..170699085ea11 100644
--- a/clang/lib/Sema/SemaOverload.cpp
+++ b/clang/lib/Sema/SemaOverload.cpp
@@ -1521,6 +1521,12 @@ static bool IsOverloadOrOverrideImpl(Sema &SemaRef, FunctionDecl *New,
return false;
};
+ // We look at the parameters first, as it is the common case.
+ // However we should not emit diagnostic before checking
+ // the overloads do not
diff er by constraints or other discriminant.
+ bool ShouldDiagnoseInconsistentRefQualifiers = false;
+ bool HaveInconsistentQualifiers = false;
+
if (OldMethod && OldMethod->isExplicitObjectMemberFunction())
OldParamsOffset++;
if (NewMethod && NewMethod->isExplicitObjectMemberFunction())
@@ -1557,17 +1563,20 @@ static bool IsOverloadOrOverrideImpl(Sema &SemaRef, FunctionDecl *New,
}(OldMethod, NewMethod);
if (!HaveCorrespondingObjectParameters) {
- if (DiagnoseInconsistentRefQualifiers())
- return true;
+ ShouldDiagnoseInconsistentRefQualifiers = true;
// CWG2554
// and, if at least one is an explicit object member function, ignoring
// object parameters
if (!UseOverrideRules || (!NewMethod->isExplicitObjectMemberFunction() &&
!OldMethod->isExplicitObjectMemberFunction()))
- return true;
+ HaveInconsistentQualifiers = true;
}
}
+ if (NewMethod && OldMethod && OldMethod->isImplicitObjectMemberFunction() &&
+ NewMethod->isImplicitObjectMemberFunction())
+ ShouldDiagnoseInconsistentRefQualifiers = true;
+
if (!UseOverrideRules &&
New->getTemplateSpecializationKind() != TSK_ExplicitSpecialization) {
AssociatedConstraint NewRC = New->getTrailingRequiresClause(),
@@ -1582,12 +1591,6 @@ static bool IsOverloadOrOverrideImpl(Sema &SemaRef, FunctionDecl *New,
return true;
}
- if (NewMethod && OldMethod && OldMethod->isImplicitObjectMemberFunction() &&
- NewMethod->isImplicitObjectMemberFunction()) {
- if (DiagnoseInconsistentRefQualifiers())
- return true;
- }
-
// Though pass_object_size is placed on parameters and takes an argument, we
// consider it to be a function-level modifier for the sake of function
// identity. Either the function has one or more parameters with
@@ -1612,6 +1615,11 @@ static bool IsOverloadOrOverrideImpl(Sema &SemaRef, FunctionDecl *New,
return true;
}
+ if ((ShouldDiagnoseInconsistentRefQualifiers &&
+ DiagnoseInconsistentRefQualifiers()) ||
+ HaveInconsistentQualifiers)
+ return true;
+
// At this point, it is known that the two functions have the same signature.
if (SemaRef.getLangOpts().CUDA && ConsiderCudaAttrs) {
// Don't allow overloading of destructors. (In theory we could, but it
diff --git a/clang/test/CXX/drs/cwg24xx.cpp b/clang/test/CXX/drs/cwg24xx.cpp
index b27c6b823940c..0a6a05c125451 100644
--- a/clang/test/CXX/drs/cwg24xx.cpp
+++ b/clang/test/CXX/drs/cwg24xx.cpp
@@ -212,5 +212,16 @@ struct T : S {
virtual void k() &;
virtual void l() &&;
};
+#if __cplusplus >= 202002L
+
+// We should not error on inconsistent ref-qualifiers if the functions
+// have
diff erent constraints.
+template <unsigned R> struct type {
+ void func() const requires(R == 0);
+ void func() & requires(R == 1);
+};
+
+#endif
+
#endif
}
More information about the cfe-commits
mailing list