[clang] [clang][bytecode] Fix activating primitive array elements (PR #191772)
via cfe-commits
cfe-commits at lists.llvm.org
Mon Apr 13 01:42:47 PDT 2026
llvmbot wrote:
<!--LLVM PR SUMMARY COMMENT-->
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Timm Baeder (tbaederr)
<details>
<summary>Changes</summary>
For primitive array elements, we would accidentally activate the element and then immediate de-activate the array root, which is wrong. Ignore the element from the beginning to the later check never even compares with the element.
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/191772.diff
2 Files Affected:
- (modified) clang/lib/AST/ByteCode/Pointer.cpp (+5)
- (modified) clang/test/AST/ByteCode/placement-new.cpp (+14)
``````````diff
diff --git a/clang/lib/AST/ByteCode/Pointer.cpp b/clang/lib/AST/ByteCode/Pointer.cpp
index 16c364d279020..a0a1c64bfd975 100644
--- a/clang/lib/AST/ByteCode/Pointer.cpp
+++ b/clang/lib/AST/ByteCode/Pointer.cpp
@@ -669,6 +669,11 @@ void Pointer::activate() const {
};
Pointer B = *this;
+ // Primitive array elements can't be activated individually, so
+ // look at the array root instead.
+ if (B.getFieldDesc()->isPrimitiveArray() && B.isArrayElement())
+ B = B.getArray();
+
while (!B.isRoot() && B.inUnion()) {
activate(B);
diff --git a/clang/test/AST/ByteCode/placement-new.cpp b/clang/test/AST/ByteCode/placement-new.cpp
index 6091ab5602121..0175d7cfac785 100644
--- a/clang/test/AST/ByteCode/placement-new.cpp
+++ b/clang/test/AST/ByteCode/placement-new.cpp
@@ -539,3 +539,17 @@ namespace DirectBaseHasNoRecord {
static_assert(test_multidim_single_start() == 13); // both-error {{not an integral constant expression}} \
// both-note {{in call to}}
}
+
+namespace PrimArray {
+ constexpr int test_start_lifetime_array() {
+ struct S {
+ union { int storage[4]; };
+ };
+ S s;
+ s.storage[0] = 10;
+ ::new (&s.storage[0]) int(10);
+ ::new (&s.storage[1]) int(20);
+ return s.storage[0] + s.storage[1];
+ }
+ static_assert(test_start_lifetime_array() == 30);
+}
``````````
</details>
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/191772
More information about the cfe-commits
mailing list