[clang-tools-extra] [clang-tidy] Adds readability-redundant-const check (PR #189733)
Berkay Sahin via cfe-commits
cfe-commits at lists.llvm.org
Sat Apr 11 11:30:45 PDT 2026
================
@@ -0,0 +1,100 @@
+//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
+//
+// Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM Exceptions.
+// See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information.
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: Apache-2.0 WITH LLVM-exception
+//
+//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
+
+#include "RedundantConstCheck.h"
+#include "../utils/LexerUtils.h"
+#include "clang/ASTMatchers/ASTMatchFinder.h"
+#include "clang/ASTMatchers/ASTMatchers.h"
+#include <optional>
+
+using namespace clang::ast_matchers;
+
+namespace clang::tidy::readability {
+
+static std::optional<Token>
+findConstToRemove(const VarDecl *VD, const MatchFinder::MatchResult &Result) {
+ const SourceManager &SM = *Result.SourceManager;
+
+ const SourceLocation NameBeginLoc = VD->getQualifier()
+ ? VD->getQualifierLoc().getBeginLoc()
+ : VD->getLocation();
+
+ const bool IsPointer =
+ VD->getType()->isPointerType() || VD->getType()->isMemberPointerType();
+
+ // If the 'findPreviousTokenKind' below fails,
+ // we know it is a pointer but cannot find the start token.
+ // This can happen when either type is aliased or `auto` was used.
+ // e.g: constexpr const auto const str = "hello";
+ // In cases like this, Clang already warns about the use of const
+ // as duplicate, so we can safely ignore these cases.
+ const SourceLocation ConstSearchStartLoc =
+ !IsPointer
+ ? VD->getBeginLoc()
+ : utils::lexer::findPreviousTokenKind(
+ NameBeginLoc, SM, Result.Context->getLangOpts(), tok::star);
+
+ if (ConstSearchStartLoc.isInvalid())
+ return std::nullopt;
+
+ const SourceLocation PrevSemi = utils::lexer::findPreviousAnyTokenKind(
+ NameBeginLoc, SM, Result.Context->getLangOpts(), tok::semi);
+
+ // Verify that there is no semicolon between ConstSearchStartLoc and
+ // NameBeginLoc. This is to limit search area for our variable decl only
+ if (!PrevSemi.isInvalid() &&
+ SM.isBeforeInTranslationUnit(ConstSearchStartLoc, PrevSemi))
+ return std::nullopt;
+
+ const CharSourceRange FileRange = Lexer::makeFileCharRange(
+ CharSourceRange::getCharRange(ConstSearchStartLoc, NameBeginLoc), SM,
+ Result.Context->getLangOpts());
+
+ if (FileRange.isInvalid())
+ return std::nullopt;
+
+ return utils::lexer::getQualifyingToken(tok::kw_const, FileRange,
+ *Result.Context, SM);
+}
+
+RedundantConstCheck::RedundantConstCheck(StringRef Name,
+ ClangTidyContext *Context)
+ : ClangTidyCheck(Name, Context) {}
+
+void RedundantConstCheck::registerMatchers(MatchFinder *Finder) {
+ Finder->addMatcher(
+ varDecl(isConstexpr(), unless(hasType(referenceType()))).bind("var_decl"),
+ this);
+}
+
+void RedundantConstCheck::check(const MatchFinder::MatchResult &Result) {
+ const auto *VD = Result.Nodes.getNodeAs<VarDecl>("var_decl");
+
+ // Since we cannot tell the difference between `constexpr const` and
+ // `constexpr` from the AST only, if we cannot find the actual `const` token,
+ // we cannot do anything
+ const std::optional<Token> Tok = findConstToRemove(VD, Result);
+ if (!Tok)
+ return;
+
+ diag(Tok->getLocation(),
+ "redundant use of 'const'; 'constexpr' already implies 'const'")
----------------
berkaysahiin wrote:
Feel like if we expand this more than constexpr at some point we can keep the first sentence same and change the reason like:
`redundant use of 'const'; here is the reason`
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/189733
More information about the cfe-commits
mailing list