[clang-tools-extra] [clang-tidy] Fix some false positive in bugprone-move-forwarding-reference (PR #191435)

[via cfe-commits]

================
@@ -252,16 +252,14 @@ Changes in existing checks
   positive when increment/decrement operators appear inside lambda bodies that
   are part of a condition expression.
 
-- Improved :doc:`bugprone-incorrect-enable-if
-  <clang-tidy/checks/bugprone/incorrect-enable-if>` check to not
-  insert an extraneous ``typename`` on code like
-  ``typename std::enable_if<...>``, where there's already a ``typename`` and
-  only the ``::type`` at the end is missing.
-
 - Improved :doc:`bugprone-macro-parentheses
   <clang-tidy/checks/bugprone/macro-parentheses>` check by printing the macro
   definition in the warning message if the macro is defined on command line.
 
+- Improved :doc:`bugprone-move-forwarding-reference
+  <clang-tidy/checks/bugprone/move-forwarding-reference>` check by removing some
+  false positive in the context of moved lambda captures.
----------------
EugeneZelenko wrote:

```suggestion
  false positives in the context of moved lambda captures.
```

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/191435