[clang] 3ecede5 - [clang][bytecode] Remove useless emitCheckAllocations calls (#186385)
via cfe-commits
cfe-commits at lists.llvm.org
Fri Mar 13 08:29:04 PDT 2026
Author: Timm Baeder
Date: 2026-03-13T16:28:58+01:00
New Revision: 3ecede5d6c4d9946d45125678aaefbdc593f6044
URL: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/3ecede5d6c4d9946d45125678aaefbdc593f6044
DIFF: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/3ecede5d6c4d9946d45125678aaefbdc593f6044.diff
LOG: [clang][bytecode] Remove useless emitCheckAllocations calls (#186385)
The one at the top of visitExpr doesn't make sense (we *just* started
visiting the expression, how can there be leaked allocations?) and the
one at the bottom is already handled via maybeDestroyLocals.
Added:
Modified:
clang/lib/AST/ByteCode/Compiler.cpp
Removed:
################################################################################
diff --git a/clang/lib/AST/ByteCode/Compiler.cpp b/clang/lib/AST/ByteCode/Compiler.cpp
index 27ae2eeb1b99c..13d6dcc92356d 100644
--- a/clang/lib/AST/ByteCode/Compiler.cpp
+++ b/clang/lib/AST/ByteCode/Compiler.cpp
@@ -5056,12 +5056,6 @@ template <class Emitter>
bool Compiler<Emitter>::visitExpr(const Expr *E, bool DestroyToplevelScope) {
LocalScope<Emitter> RootScope(this, ScopeKind::FullExpression);
- // If we won't destroy the toplevel scope, check for memory leaks first.
- if (!DestroyToplevelScope) {
- if (!this->emitCheckAllocations(E))
- return false;
- }
-
auto maybeDestroyLocals = [&]() -> bool {
if (DestroyToplevelScope)
return RootScope.destroyLocals() && this->emitCheckAllocations(E);
@@ -5102,7 +5096,7 @@ bool Compiler<Emitter>::visitExpr(const Expr *E, bool DestroyToplevelScope) {
return this->emitRetValue(E) && maybeDestroyLocals();
}
- return maybeDestroyLocals() && this->emitCheckAllocations(E) && false;
+ return maybeDestroyLocals() && false;
}
template <class Emitter>
More information about the cfe-commits
mailing list