[clang] 5195daf - [clang][bytecode][NFC] Remove an outdated comment (#171569)

[via cfe-commits]

Author: Timm Baeder
Date: 2025-12-10T10:20:07+01:00
New Revision: 5195daf50ae89982a13121db697cedb6b4462ec0

URL: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/5195daf50ae89982a13121db697cedb6b4462ec0
DIFF: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/5195daf50ae89982a13121db697cedb6b4462ec0.diff

LOG: [clang][bytecode][NFC] Remove an outdated comment (#171569)

Both implementations emit the same diagnostics these days.

Added: 
    

Modified: 
    clang/test/AST/ByteCode/new-delete.cpp

Removed: 
    


################################################################################
diff  --git a/clang/test/AST/ByteCode/new-delete.cpp b/clang/test/AST/ByteCode/new-delete.cpp
index 43e1f6bfcc9a6..9345946a31e99 100644
--- a/clang/test/AST/ByteCode/new-delete.cpp
+++ b/clang/test/AST/ByteCode/new-delete.cpp
@@ -523,7 +523,6 @@ namespace DeleteRunsDtors {
   static_assert(abc2() == 1);
 }
 
-/// FIXME: There is a slight 
diff erence in diagnostics here.
 namespace FaultyDtorCalledByDelete {
   struct InnerFoo {
     int *mem;