[clang] [clang-format] Correctly annotate static overloaded operator calls (PR #161944)

[Björn Schäpers via cfe-commits]

================
@@ -3802,7 +3802,7 @@ static bool isFunctionDeclarationName(const LangOptions &LangOpts,
   const auto *Prev = Current.getPreviousNonComment();
   assert(Prev);
 
-  if (Prev->is(tok::coloncolon))
+  if (Prev->is(tok::coloncolon) && Prev->hasWhitespaceBefore())
----------------
HazardyKnusperkeks wrote:

Yes it can be, that was never the point of any discussion (on my side). But isn't this PR not about to not mark a function call to `::operator` as declaration? And I just show, that the same code, just with a space before `::` is annotated differently.

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/161944