[clang] [NFC][OpenACC][CIR] Extract 'base' class for Recipe generation (PR #160603)
Erich Keane via cfe-commits
cfe-commits at lists.llvm.org
Fri Sep 26 06:08:21 PDT 2025
================
@@ -0,0 +1,309 @@
+//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
+//
+// Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM Exceptions.
+// See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information.
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: Apache-2.0 WITH LLVM-exception
+//
+//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
+//
+// Helperes to emit OpenACC clause recipes as CIR code.
+//
+//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
+
+#include "CIRGenOpenACCRecipe.h"
+
+namespace clang::CIRGen {
+mlir::Block *OpenACCRecipeBuilderBase::createRecipeBlock(mlir::Region ®ion,
+ mlir::Type opTy,
+ mlir::Location loc,
+ size_t numBounds,
+ bool isInit) {
+ llvm::SmallVector<mlir::Type> types;
+ types.reserve(numBounds + 2);
+ types.push_back(opTy);
+ // The init section is the only one that doesn't have TWO copies of the
+ // operation-type. Copy has a to/from, and destroy has a
+ // 'reference'/'privatized' copy version.
+ if (!isInit)
+ types.push_back(opTy);
+
+ auto boundsTy = mlir::acc::DataBoundsType::get(&cgf.getMLIRContext());
+ for (size_t i = 0; i < numBounds; ++i)
+ types.push_back(boundsTy);
+
+ llvm::SmallVector<mlir::Location> locs{types.size(), loc};
+ return builder.createBlock(®ion, region.end(), types, locs);
+}
+mlir::Value
+OpenACCRecipeBuilderBase::createBoundsLoop(mlir::Value subscriptedValue,
+ mlir::Value bound,
+ mlir::Location loc, bool inverse) {
+ mlir::Operation *bodyInsertLoc;
+
+ mlir::Type itrTy = cgf.cgm.convertType(cgf.getContext().UnsignedLongLongTy);
+ auto itrPtrTy = cir::PointerType::get(itrTy);
+ mlir::IntegerAttr itrAlign =
+ cgf.cgm.getSize(cgf.getContext().getTypeAlignInChars(
+ cgf.getContext().UnsignedLongLongTy));
+ auto idxType = mlir::IndexType::get(&cgf.getMLIRContext());
+
+ auto doSubscriptOp = [&](mlir::Value subVal,
+ cir::LoadOp idxLoad) -> mlir::Value {
+ auto eltTy = cast<cir::PointerType>(subVal.getType()).getPointee();
+
+ if (auto arrayTy = dyn_cast<cir::ArrayType>(eltTy))
+ return builder.getArrayElement(loc, loc, subVal, arrayTy.getElementType(),
+ idxLoad.getResult(),
+ /*shouldDecay=*/true);
+
+ assert(isa<cir::PointerType>(eltTy));
+
+ auto eltLoad = cir::LoadOp::create(builder, loc, {subVal});
+
+ return cir::PtrStrideOp::create(builder, loc, eltLoad.getType(), eltLoad,
+ idxLoad.getResult())
+ .getResult();
+ };
+
+ auto forStmtBuilder = [&]() {
+ // get the lower and upper bound for iterating over.
+ auto lowerBoundVal =
+ mlir::acc::GetLowerboundOp::create(builder, loc, idxType, bound);
+ auto lbConversion = mlir::UnrealizedConversionCastOp::create(
+ builder, loc, itrTy, lowerBoundVal.getResult());
+ auto upperBoundVal =
+ mlir::acc::GetUpperboundOp::create(builder, loc, idxType, bound);
+ auto ubConversion = mlir::UnrealizedConversionCastOp::create(
+ builder, loc, itrTy, upperBoundVal.getResult());
+
+ // Create a memory location for the iterator.
+ auto itr =
+ cir::AllocaOp::create(builder, loc, itrPtrTy, itrTy, "iter", itrAlign);
+ // Store to the iterator: either lower bound, or if inverse loop, upper
+ // bound.
+ if (inverse) {
+ cir::ConstantOp constOne = builder.getConstInt(loc, itrTy, 1);
+
+ auto sub =
+ cir::BinOp::create(builder, loc, itrTy, cir::BinOpKind::Sub,
+ ubConversion.getResult(0), constOne.getResult());
+
+ // Upperbound is exclusive, so subtract 1.
+ builder.CIRBaseBuilderTy::createStore(loc, sub.getResult(), itr);
+ } else {
+ // Lowerbound is inclusive, so we can include it.
+ builder.CIRBaseBuilderTy::createStore(loc, lbConversion.getResult(0),
+ itr);
+ }
+ // Save the 'end' iterator based on whether we are inverted or not. This
+ // end iterator never changes, so we can just get it and convert it, so no
+ // need to store/load/etc.
+ auto endItr = inverse ? lbConversion : ubConversion;
+
+ builder.createFor(
+ loc,
+ /*condBuilder=*/
+ [&](mlir::OpBuilder &b, mlir::Location loc) {
+ auto loadCur = cir::LoadOp::create(builder, loc, {itr});
+ // Use 'not equal' since we are just doing an increment/decrement.
+ auto cmp = builder.createCompare(
+ loc, inverse ? cir::CmpOpKind::ge : cir::CmpOpKind::lt,
+ loadCur.getResult(), endItr.getResult(0));
+ builder.createCondition(cmp);
+ },
+ /*bodyBuilder=*/
+ [&](mlir::OpBuilder &b, mlir::Location loc) {
+ auto load = cir::LoadOp::create(builder, loc, {itr});
+
+ if (subscriptedValue)
+ subscriptedValue = doSubscriptOp(subscriptedValue, load);
+ bodyInsertLoc = builder.createYield(loc);
+ },
+ /*stepBuilder=*/
+ [&](mlir::OpBuilder &b, mlir::Location loc) {
+ auto load = cir::LoadOp::create(builder, loc, {itr});
+ auto unary = cir::UnaryOp::create(builder, loc, load.getType(),
+ inverse ? cir::UnaryOpKind::Dec
+ : cir::UnaryOpKind::Inc,
+ load.getResult());
+ builder.CIRBaseBuilderTy::createStore(loc, unary.getResult(), itr);
+ builder.createYield(loc);
+ });
+ };
+
+ cir::ScopeOp::create(builder, loc,
+ [&](mlir::OpBuilder &b, mlir::Location loc) {
+ forStmtBuilder();
+ builder.createYield(loc);
+ });
+
+ // Leave the insertion point to be inside the body, so we can loop over
+ // these things.
+ builder.setInsertionPoint(bodyInsertLoc);
+ return subscriptedValue;
+}
+
+mlir::acc::ReductionOperator
+OpenACCRecipeBuilderBase::convertReductionOp(OpenACCReductionOperator op) {
+ switch (op) {
+ case OpenACCReductionOperator::Addition:
+ return mlir::acc::ReductionOperator::AccAdd;
+ case OpenACCReductionOperator::Multiplication:
+ return mlir::acc::ReductionOperator::AccMul;
+ case OpenACCReductionOperator::Max:
+ return mlir::acc::ReductionOperator::AccMax;
+ case OpenACCReductionOperator::Min:
+ return mlir::acc::ReductionOperator::AccMin;
+ case OpenACCReductionOperator::BitwiseAnd:
+ return mlir::acc::ReductionOperator::AccIand;
+ case OpenACCReductionOperator::BitwiseOr:
+ return mlir::acc::ReductionOperator::AccIor;
+ case OpenACCReductionOperator::BitwiseXOr:
+ return mlir::acc::ReductionOperator::AccXor;
+ case OpenACCReductionOperator::And:
+ return mlir::acc::ReductionOperator::AccLand;
+ case OpenACCReductionOperator::Or:
+ return mlir::acc::ReductionOperator::AccLor;
+ case OpenACCReductionOperator::Invalid:
+ llvm_unreachable("invalid reduction operator");
+ }
+
+ llvm_unreachable("invalid reduction operator");
+}
+
+// This function generates the 'destroy' section for a recipe. Note
+// that this function is not 'insertion point' clean, in that it alters the
+// insertion point to be inside of the 'destroy' section of the recipe, but
+// doesn't restore it aftewards.
+void OpenACCRecipeBuilderBase::createRecipeDestroySection(
+ mlir::Location loc, mlir::Location locEnd, mlir::Value mainOp,
+ CharUnits alignment, QualType origType, size_t numBounds, QualType baseType,
+ mlir::Region &destroyRegion) {
+ mlir::Block *block = createRecipeBlock(destroyRegion, mainOp.getType(), loc,
+ numBounds, /*isInit=*/false);
+ builder.setInsertionPointToEnd(&destroyRegion.back());
+ CIRGenFunction::LexicalScope ls(cgf, loc, block);
+
+ mlir::Type elementTy =
+ mlir::cast<cir::PointerType>(mainOp.getType()).getPointee();
+ auto emitDestroy = [&](mlir::Value var, mlir::Type ty) {
+ Address addr{var, ty, alignment};
+ cgf.emitDestroy(addr, origType,
+ cgf.getDestroyer(QualType::DK_cxx_destructor));
+ };
+
+ if (numBounds) {
+ mlir::OpBuilder::InsertionGuard guardCase(builder);
+ // Get the range of bounds arguments, which are all but the 1st 2. 1st is
+ // a 'reference', 2nd is the 'private' variant we need to destroy from.
+ llvm::MutableArrayRef<mlir::BlockArgument> boundsRange =
+ block->getArguments().drop_front(2);
+
+ mlir::Value subscriptedValue = block->getArgument(1);
+ for (mlir::BlockArgument boundArg : llvm::reverse(boundsRange))
+ subscriptedValue = createBoundsLoop(subscriptedValue, boundArg, loc,
+ /*inverse=*/true);
+
+ emitDestroy(subscriptedValue, cgf.cgm.convertType(origType));
+ } else {
+ // If we don't have any bounds, we can just destroy the variable directly.
+ // The destroy region has a signature of "original item, privatized item".
+ // So the 2nd item is the one that needs destroying, the former is just
+ // for reference and we don't really have a need for it at the moment.
+ emitDestroy(block->getArgument(1), elementTy);
+ }
+
+ mlir::acc::YieldOp::create(builder, locEnd);
+}
+void OpenACCRecipeBuilderBase::createPrivateInitRecipe(
----------------
erichkeane wrote:
Nope! I definitely expect we'll lose at least a function or two as this goes along. Just lost it along the way :) I've put it back.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/160603
More information about the cfe-commits
mailing list