[clang-tools-extra] [clang-tidy] Add bugprone-default-lambda-capture (PR #160150)

[JJ Marr via cfe-commits]

================
@@ -0,0 +1,40 @@
+//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
+//
+// Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM Exceptions.
+// See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information.
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: Apache-2.0 WITH LLVM-exception
+//
+//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
+
+#include "DefaultLambdaCaptureCheck.h"
+#include "clang/AST/ASTContext.h"
+#include "clang/ASTMatchers/ASTMatchFinder.h"
+
+using namespace clang::ast_matchers;
+
+namespace clang::tidy::bugprone {
+
+namespace {
+AST_MATCHER(LambdaExpr, hasDefaultCapture) {
+  return Node.getCaptureDefault() != LCD_None;
+}
+
+} // namespace
+
+void DefaultLambdaCaptureCheck::registerMatchers(MatchFinder *Finder) {
+  Finder->addMatcher(lambdaExpr(hasDefaultCapture()).bind("lambda"), this);
+}
+
+void DefaultLambdaCaptureCheck::check(const MatchFinder::MatchResult &Result) {
+  const auto *Lambda = Result.Nodes.getNodeAs<LambdaExpr>("lambda");
+  assert(Lambda);
+
+  SourceLocation DefaultCaptureLoc = Lambda->getCaptureDefaultLoc();
----------------
jjmarr-amd wrote:

@EugeneZelenko No. I saw this thread:
https://discourse.llvm.org/t/rfc-create-hardened-clang-tidy-config-for-clang-tidy-directory/87247
and the merged PR, but didn't look closely enough to see that `misc-const-correctness` wasn't enabled.
How would you feel about another PR enabling `misc-const-correctness` in the `clang-tidy` directory?

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/160150