[clang] [APINotes] Support annotating safety of APIs (PR #157506)
Egor Zhdan via cfe-commits
cfe-commits at lists.llvm.org
Thu Sep 11 06:38:48 PDT 2025
================
@@ -291,6 +292,13 @@ static void ProcessAPINotes(Sema &S, Decl *D,
});
}
+ // swift_safety
+ if (auto SafetyKind = Info.getSwiftSafety();
+ SafetyKind != api_notes::SwiftSafetyKind::None)
+ D->addAttr(SwiftAttrAttr::Create(
+ S.Context,
+ SafetyKind == api_notes::SwiftSafetyKind::Safe ? "safe" : "unsafe"));
----------------
egorzhdan wrote:
Nice!
> I am not sure if unspecified should have the semantics of removing safe/unsafe annotations.
I think it would make sense to be consistent with the nullability annotations here. I wonder if e.g. overriding the nullability specifier of a function parameter via API Notes would have a similar effect.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/157506
More information about the cfe-commits
mailing list