[clang] [analyzer] Revert #115918, so empty base class optimization works again (PR #157480)
DonĂ¡t Nagy via cfe-commits
cfe-commits at lists.llvm.org
Mon Sep 8 09:42:22 PDT 2025
NagyDonat wrote:
Sounds reasonable.
I feel a bit guilty that I wasn't able to predict this regression when I reviewed the reverted commit as "LGTM, clean little patch", but I don't think that I could've done better without investing drastically more effort into the review.
By the way does this revert affect any of the commits that were related to the reverted one?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/157480
More information about the cfe-commits
mailing list