[clang-tools-extra] [clang-tidy] Minor documentation wording for performance-noexcept-move-constructor (PR #157384)

[via cfe-commits]

llvmbot wrote:


<!--LLVM PR SUMMARY COMMENT-->

@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang-tidy

Author: Nicolas van Kempen (nicovank)

<details>
<summary>Changes</summary>


Fix #<!-- -->157343.


---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/157384.diff


1 Files Affected:

- (modified) clang-tools-extra/docs/clang-tidy/checks/performance/noexcept-move-constructor.rst (+1-1) 


``````````diff
diff --git a/clang-tools-extra/docs/clang-tidy/checks/performance/noexcept-move-constructor.rst b/clang-tools-extra/docs/clang-tidy/checks/performance/noexcept-move-constructor.rst
index 05f1d85f1af5a..eb605c5b0a53b 100644
--- a/clang-tools-extra/docs/clang-tidy/checks/performance/noexcept-move-constructor.rst
+++ b/clang-tools-extra/docs/clang-tidy/checks/performance/noexcept-move-constructor.rst
@@ -9,5 +9,5 @@ marked with ``noexcept`` or marked with ``noexcept(expr)`` where ``expr``
 evaluates to ``false`` (but is not a ``false`` literal itself).
 
 Move constructors of all the types used with STL containers, for example,
-need to be declared ``noexcept``. Otherwise STL will choose copy constructors
+should be declared ``noexcept``. Otherwise STL may choose copy constructors
 instead. The same is valid for move assignment operations.

``````````

</details>


https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/157384