[clang] [OpenMP] Conditional modifier on lastprivate clause is producing incorrect result in C mode (PR #156004)
CHANDRA GHALE via cfe-commits
cfe-commits at lists.llvm.org
Fri Aug 29 03:48:55 PDT 2025
https://github.com/chandraghale created https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/156004
Conditional modifier on lastprivate clause is producing incorrect result when compiled with clang( C compiler). IR is not emitting while compilation with C compiler.
However it is working correctly with clang++
The OpenMP hook that emits the conditional modifier (checkAndEmitLastprivateConditional) is skipped in C because assignment is a prvalue and takes the scalar path.
```
C = → prvalue → EmitAnyExpr(TEK_Scalar) → ScalarExprEmitter::VisitBinAssign (hook not reached)
C++ = → lvalue → EmitBinaryOperatorLValue
```
```
Failing Test Case :
#include <stdio.h>
#define N 10
int A[N];
void condlastprivate() {
int x, y, z, k;
x = y = z = k = 0;
#pragma omp parallel for lastprivate(conditional: x,y, z) lastprivate(k)
for( k=0; k<N; k++){
if ((k >2 ) && (k <6))
{ x = A[k]; z = A[k]+111; }
else
{ y = A[k]+222; }
}
printf("Expecting: x=5, y=231, z=116 k=10 Got: x=%d y=%d z=%d k=%d \n", x,y,z,k);
}
int main() {
for( int i=0; i<N; i++)
{ A[i] = i; }
condlastprivate();
return 0;
}
```
```
#>./clang -fopenmp cond_c.c
#> ./a.out
Expecting: x=5, y=231, z=116 k=10 **Got: x=-1376379760 y=231 z=631465600** k=10
```
>From 5098ddaa2f4b7a8a2331be6c5fc43f04f3aaba6c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Chandra Ghale <ghale at pe31.hpc.amslabs.hpecorp.net>
Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2025 05:39:07 -0500
Subject: [PATCH] Conditional modifier on lastprivate code is producing
incorrect result in C mode
---
clang/lib/CodeGen/CGExprScalar.cpp | 5 ++
clang/test/OpenMP/for_lst_private_codegen_c.c | 53 +++++++++++++++++++
2 files changed, 58 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 clang/test/OpenMP/for_lst_private_codegen_c.c
diff --git a/clang/lib/CodeGen/CGExprScalar.cpp b/clang/lib/CodeGen/CGExprScalar.cpp
index 193710bef2d16..d37712f27ed5e 100644
--- a/clang/lib/CodeGen/CGExprScalar.cpp
+++ b/clang/lib/CodeGen/CGExprScalar.cpp
@@ -5183,6 +5183,11 @@ Value *ScalarExprEmitter::VisitBinAssign(const BinaryOperator *E) {
CGF.EmitStoreThroughLValue(RValue::get(RHS), LHS);
}
}
+ // OpenMP: Handle lastprivate(condition:) in scalar assignment
+ if (CGF.getLangOpts().OpenMP) {
+ CGF.CGM.getOpenMPRuntime().checkAndEmitLastprivateConditional(CGF,
+ E->getLHS());
+ }
// If the result is clearly ignored, return now.
if (Ignore)
diff --git a/clang/test/OpenMP/for_lst_private_codegen_c.c b/clang/test/OpenMP/for_lst_private_codegen_c.c
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000..c56c5b6fb9351
--- /dev/null
+++ b/clang/test/OpenMP/for_lst_private_codegen_c.c
@@ -0,0 +1,53 @@
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -verify -x c -triple x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu -fopenmp -fopenmp-version=52 -emit-llvm -o - %s | FileCheck %s
+// expected-no-diagnostics
+
+#define N 100
+int A[N];
+
+void condlastprivate() {
+ int x, y, z, k;
+ x = y = z = k = 0;
+
+ #pragma omp parallel for lastprivate(conditional: x,y,z) lastprivate(k)
+ for (k = 0; k < N; k++) {
+ if ((k > 2) && (k < 6)) {
+ x = A[k];
+ z = A[k] + 111;
+ } else {
+ y = A[k] + 222;
+ }
+ }
+}
+
+int main() {
+ for (int i = 0; i < N; i++)
+ A[i] = i;
+ condlastprivate();
+ return 0;
+}
+
+// CHECK: @.pl_cond.x_[[ID:[0-9]+]].iv = common global i32 0, align 4
+// CHECK: @pl_cond.x_[[ID]] = common global i32 0, align 4
+// CHECK: @.gomp_critical_user_pl_cond.x_[[ID]].var = common global [8 x i32] zeroinitializer, align 8
+
+// CHECK: @.pl_cond.z_[[ID]].iv = common global i32 0, align 4
+// CHECK: @pl_cond.z_[[ID]] = common global i32 0, align 4
+// CHECK: @.gomp_critical_user_pl_cond.z_[[ID]].var = common global [8 x i32] zeroinitializer, align 8
+
+// CHECK: @.pl_cond.y_[[ID]].iv = common global i32 0, align 4
+// CHECK: @pl_cond.y_[[ID]] = common global i32 0, align 4
+// CHECK: @.gomp_critical_user_pl_cond.y_[[ID]].var = common global [8 x i32] zeroinitializer, align 8
+
+// CHECK-LABEL: define internal void @condlastprivate.omp_outlined(
+// CHECK: call void @__kmpc_critical(ptr @2, {{.*}}, ptr @.gomp_critical_user_pl_cond.x_[[ID]].var)
+// CHECK: store i32 %{{[0-9]+}}, ptr @pl_cond.x_[[ID]], align 4
+// CHECK: call void @__kmpc_end_critical(ptr @2, {{.*}}, ptr @.gomp_critical_user_pl_cond.x_[[ID]].var)
+
+// CHECK: call void @__kmpc_critical(ptr @2, {{.*}}, ptr @.gomp_critical_user_pl_cond.z_[[ID]].var)
+// CHECK: store i32 %{{[0-9]+}}, ptr @pl_cond.z_[[ID]], align 4
+// CHECK: call void @__kmpc_end_critical(ptr @2, {{.*}}, ptr @.gomp_critical_user_pl_cond.z_[[ID]].var)
+
+// CHECK: call void @__kmpc_critical(ptr @2, {{.*}}, ptr @.gomp_critical_user_pl_cond.y_[[ID]].var)
+// CHECK: store i32 %{{[0-9]+}}, ptr @pl_cond.y_[[ID]], align 4
+// CHECK: call void @__kmpc_end_critical(ptr @2, {{.*}}, ptr @.gomp_critical_user_pl_cond.y_[[ID]].var)
+
More information about the cfe-commits
mailing list