[clang] [clang-format] Add option to omit wrapping for empty records (PR #151970)
via cfe-commits
cfe-commits at lists.llvm.org
Wed Aug 20 21:42:48 PDT 2025
=?utf-8?q?Tomáš?= Slanina <itzexpoexpo at gmail.com>,
=?utf-8?q?Tomáš?= Slanina <itzexpoexpo at gmail.com>,
=?utf-8?q?Tomáš?= Slanina <itzexpoexpo at gmail.com>,
=?utf-8?q?Tomáš?= Slanina <itzexpoexpo at gmail.com>,
=?utf-8?q?Tomáš?= Slanina <itzexpoexpo at gmail.com>,
=?utf-8?q?Tomáš?= Slanina <itzexpoexpo at gmail.com>,
=?utf-8?q?Tomáš?= Slanina <itzexpoexpo at gmail.com>,
=?utf-8?q?Tomáš?= Slanina <itzexpoexpo at gmail.com>,
=?utf-8?q?Tomáš?= Slanina <itzexpoexpo at gmail.com>,
=?utf-8?q?Tomáš?= Slanina <itzexpoexpo at gmail.com>
Message-ID:
In-Reply-To: <llvm.org/llvm/llvm-project/pull/151970 at github.com>
owenca wrote:
> It might be worth notifying me of such a large change before I take the time to polish a solution you were already going to refuse to merge.
How did you know that I was "already going to refuse to merge" when myself didn't because I had *not* reviewed your patch? Anyway, we have a long-standing [high bar](https://clang.llvm.org/docs/ClangFormatStyleOptions.html#adding-additional-style-options) for adding new options although it hasn't always been enforced in recent years. Also, it happened from time to time that patches for new options didn't get merged because reviewers (e.g. #118566) or authors themselves (e.g. #150166) had come up with better alternatives.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/151970
More information about the cfe-commits
mailing list