[clang] [CIR] Plus & Minus CompoundAssignment support for ComplexType (PR #150759)
Amr Hesham via cfe-commits
cfe-commits at lists.llvm.org
Mon Aug 4 10:29:44 PDT 2025
================
@@ -630,6 +654,104 @@ ComplexExprEmitter::emitBinOps(const BinaryOperator *e, QualType promotionTy) {
return binOpInfo;
}
+LValue ComplexExprEmitter::emitCompoundAssignLValue(
+ const CompoundAssignOperator *e,
+ mlir::Value (ComplexExprEmitter::*func)(const BinOpInfo &), RValue &value) {
+ QualType lhsTy = e->getLHS()->getType();
+ QualType rhsTy = e->getRHS()->getType();
+ SourceLocation exprLoc = e->getExprLoc();
+ mlir::Location loc = cgf.getLoc(exprLoc);
+
+ if (lhsTy->getAs<AtomicType>()) {
+ cgf.cgm.errorNYI("emitCompoundAssignLValue AtmoicType");
+ return {};
+ }
+
+ BinOpInfo opInfo{loc};
+ opInfo.fpFeatures = e->getFPFeaturesInEffect(cgf.getLangOpts());
+
+ assert(!cir::MissingFeatures::cgFPOptionsRAII());
+
+ // Load the RHS and LHS operands.
+ // __block variables need to have the rhs evaluated first, plus this should
+ // improve codegen a little.
+ QualType promotionTypeCR = getPromotionType(e->getComputationResultType());
+ opInfo.ty = promotionTypeCR.isNull() ? e->getComputationResultType()
+ : promotionTypeCR;
+
+ QualType complexElementTy =
+ opInfo.ty->castAs<ComplexType>()->getElementType();
+ QualType promotionTypeRHS = getPromotionType(rhsTy);
+
+ // The RHS should have been converted to the computation type.
+ if (e->getRHS()->getType()->isRealFloatingType()) {
+ if (!promotionTypeRHS.isNull()) {
+ opInfo.rhs = createComplexFromReal(
+ cgf.getBuilder(), loc,
+ cgf.emitPromotedScalarExpr(e->getRHS(), promotionTypeRHS));
+ } else {
+ assert(cgf.getContext().hasSameUnqualifiedType(complexElementTy, rhsTy));
+ opInfo.rhs = createComplexFromReal(cgf.getBuilder(), loc,
+ cgf.emitScalarExpr(e->getRHS()));
+ }
+ } else {
+ if (!promotionTypeRHS.isNull()) {
+ opInfo.rhs = cgf.emitPromotedComplexExpr(e->getRHS(), promotionTypeRHS);
+ } else {
+ assert(cgf.getContext().hasSameUnqualifiedType(opInfo.ty, rhsTy));
+ opInfo.rhs = Visit(e->getRHS());
+ }
+ }
+
+ LValue lhs = cgf.emitLValue(e->getLHS());
+
+ // Load from the l-value and convert it.
+ QualType promotionTypeLHS = getPromotionType(e->getComputationLHSType());
+ if (lhsTy->isAnyComplexType()) {
+ mlir::Value lhsValue = emitLoadOfLValue(lhs, exprLoc);
+ QualType destTy = promotionTypeLHS.isNull() ? opInfo.ty : promotionTypeLHS;
+ opInfo.lhs = emitComplexToComplexCast(lhsValue, lhsTy, destTy, exprLoc);
+ } else {
+ cgf.cgm.errorNYI("emitCompoundAssignLValue emitLoadOfScalar");
+ return {};
+ }
+
+ // Expand the binary operator.
+ mlir::Value result = (this->*func)(opInfo);
+
+ // Truncate the result and store it into the LHS lvalue.
+ if (lhsTy->isAnyComplexType()) {
+ mlir::Value resultValue =
+ emitComplexToComplexCast(result, opInfo.ty, lhsTy, exprLoc);
+ emitStoreOfComplex(loc, resultValue, lhs, /*isInit*/ false);
+ value = RValue::getComplex(resultValue);
+ } else {
+ mlir::Value resultValue =
+ cgf.emitComplexToScalarConversion(result, opInfo.ty, lhsTy, exprLoc);
+ cgf.emitStoreOfScalar(resultValue, lhs, /*isInit*/ false);
+ value = RValue::get(resultValue);
+ }
+
+ return lhs;
+}
+
+mlir::Value ComplexExprEmitter::emitCompoundAssign(
+ const CompoundAssignOperator *e,
+ mlir::Value (ComplexExprEmitter::*func)(const BinOpInfo &)) {
+ RValue val;
+ LValue lv = emitCompoundAssignLValue(e, func, val);
+
+ // The result of an assignment in C is the assigned r-value.
+ if (!cgf.getLangOpts().CPlusPlus)
----------------
AmrDeveloper wrote:
There are no differences now because of the second if statement; we will see differences in the case of `volatile` in C++
```c++
// The result of an assignment in C is the assigned r-value.
if (!CGF.getLangOpts().CPlusPlus)
return Val;
// If the lvalue is non-volatile, return the computed value of the
// assignment.
if (!LV.isVolatileQualified())
return Val;
```
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/150759
More information about the cfe-commits
mailing list