[clang] [clang] Improve constexpr-unknown diagnostics. (PR #146288)
via cfe-commits
cfe-commits at lists.llvm.org
Sun Jun 29 12:36:16 PDT 2025
github-actions[bot] wrote:
<!--LLVM CODE FORMAT COMMENT: {clang-format}-->
:warning: C/C++ code formatter, clang-format found issues in your code. :warning:
<details>
<summary>
You can test this locally with the following command:
</summary>
``````````bash
git-clang-format --diff HEAD~1 HEAD --extensions cpp -- clang/lib/AST/ExprConstant.cpp clang/test/SemaCXX/constant-expression-cxx11.cpp clang/test/SemaCXX/constant-expression-p2280r4.cpp
``````````
</details>
<details>
<summary>
View the diff from clang-format here.
</summary>
``````````diff
diff --git a/clang/lib/AST/ExprConstant.cpp b/clang/lib/AST/ExprConstant.cpp
index f94536585..a59d0b9fa 100644
--- a/clang/lib/AST/ExprConstant.cpp
+++ b/clang/lib/AST/ExprConstant.cpp
@@ -4475,7 +4475,8 @@ static CompleteObject findCompleteObject(EvalInfo &Info, const Expr *E,
// a null BaseVal. Any constexpr-unknown variable seen here is an error:
// we can't access a constexpr-unknown object.
if (!BaseVal) {
- Info.FFDiag(E, diag::note_constexpr_access_unknown_variable, 1) << AK << VD;
+ Info.FFDiag(E, diag::note_constexpr_access_unknown_variable, 1)
+ << AK << VD;
Info.Note(VD->getLocation(), diag::note_declared_at);
return CompleteObject();
}
``````````
</details>
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/146288
More information about the cfe-commits
mailing list