[clang] [clang] Improve constexpr-unknown diagnostics. (PR #146288)

via cfe-commits cfe-commits at lists.llvm.org
Sun Jun 29 12:36:16 PDT 2025


github-actions[bot] wrote:

<!--LLVM CODE FORMAT COMMENT: {clang-format}-->


:warning: C/C++ code formatter, clang-format found issues in your code. :warning:

<details>
<summary>
You can test this locally with the following command:
</summary>

``````````bash
git-clang-format --diff HEAD~1 HEAD --extensions cpp -- clang/lib/AST/ExprConstant.cpp clang/test/SemaCXX/constant-expression-cxx11.cpp clang/test/SemaCXX/constant-expression-p2280r4.cpp
``````````

</details>

<details>
<summary>
View the diff from clang-format here.
</summary>

``````````diff
diff --git a/clang/lib/AST/ExprConstant.cpp b/clang/lib/AST/ExprConstant.cpp
index f94536585..a59d0b9fa 100644
--- a/clang/lib/AST/ExprConstant.cpp
+++ b/clang/lib/AST/ExprConstant.cpp
@@ -4475,7 +4475,8 @@ static CompleteObject findCompleteObject(EvalInfo &Info, const Expr *E,
     // a null BaseVal. Any constexpr-unknown variable seen here is an error:
     // we can't access a constexpr-unknown object.
     if (!BaseVal) {
-      Info.FFDiag(E, diag::note_constexpr_access_unknown_variable, 1) << AK << VD;
+      Info.FFDiag(E, diag::note_constexpr_access_unknown_variable, 1)
+          << AK << VD;
       Info.Note(VD->getLocation(), diag::note_declared_at);
       return CompleteObject();
     }

``````````

</details>


https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/146288


More information about the cfe-commits mailing list