[clang] [CIR] Function calls with aggregate arguments and return values (PR #143377)
Sirui Mu via cfe-commits
cfe-commits at lists.llvm.org
Tue Jun 10 07:03:52 PDT 2025
================
@@ -312,8 +329,47 @@ RValue CIRGenFunction::emitCall(const CIRGenFunctionInfo &funcInfo,
assert(!cir::MissingFeatures::opCallBitcastArg());
cirCallArgs[argNo] = v;
} else {
- assert(!cir::MissingFeatures::opCallAggregateArgs());
- cgm.errorNYI("emitCall: aggregate function call argument");
+ Address src = Address::invalid();
+ if (!arg.isAggregate())
+ cgm.errorNYI(loc, "emitCall: non-aggregate call argument");
+ else
+ src = arg.hasLValue() ? arg.getKnownLValue().getAddress()
+ : arg.getKnownRValue().getAggregateAddress();
+
+ // Fast-isel and the optimizer generally like scalar values better than
+ // FCAs, so we flatten them if this is safe to do for this argument.
+ auto argRecordTy = cast<cir::RecordType>(argType);
+ auto srcTy = src.getElementType();
+ // FIXME(cir): get proper location for each argument.
+ auto argLoc = loc;
+
+ // If the source type is smaller than the destination type of the
+ // coerce-to logic, copy the source value into a temp alloca the size
+ // of the destination type to allow loading all of it. The bits past
+ // the source value are left undef.
+ // FIXME(cir): add data layout info and compare sizes instead of
----------------
Lancern wrote:
Is data layout info available in upstream yet?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/143377
More information about the cfe-commits
mailing list