[clang] [CIR] Implement folder for VecShuffleDynamicOp (PR #142315)
Amr Hesham via cfe-commits
cfe-commits at lists.llvm.org
Mon Jun 2 13:01:14 PDT 2025
================
@@ -1579,6 +1579,38 @@ OpFoldResult cir::VecExtractOp::fold(FoldAdaptor adaptor) {
// VecShuffleDynamicOp
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
+OpFoldResult cir::VecShuffleDynamicOp::fold(FoldAdaptor adaptor) {
+ mlir::Attribute vec = adaptor.getVec();
+ mlir::Attribute indices = adaptor.getIndices();
+ if (mlir::isa_and_nonnull<cir::ConstVectorAttr>(vec) &&
+ mlir::isa_and_nonnull<cir::ConstVectorAttr>(indices)) {
+ auto vecAttr = mlir::cast<cir::ConstVectorAttr>(vec);
+ auto indicesAttr = mlir::cast<cir::ConstVectorAttr>(indices);
+ auto vecTy = cast<cir::VectorType>(vecAttr.getType());
+
+ mlir::ArrayAttr vecElts = vecAttr.getElts();
+ mlir::ArrayAttr indicesElts = indicesAttr.getElts();
+
+ const uint64_t numElements = vecElts.size();
+
+ SmallVector<mlir::Attribute, 16> elements;
+ elements.reserve(numElements);
----------------
AmrDeveloper wrote:
I used `getAsValueRange` on `indices` and i was thinking we can keep `reserve` and use `push_back` easier than using the constructor and enumeration on the indices, what do you think?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/142315
More information about the cfe-commits
mailing list