[clang] [Clang] Added explanation why a is trivial copyable evaluated to false. (PR #142341)
Erich Keane via cfe-commits
cfe-commits at lists.llvm.org
Mon Jun 2 07:02:33 PDT 2025
================
@@ -1776,6 +1777,8 @@ def note_unsatisfied_trait_reason
"%VBase{has a virtual base %1}|"
"%NRBase{has a non-trivially-relocatable base %1}|"
"%NRField{has a non-trivially-relocatable member %1 of type %2}|"
+ "%NTCBase{has a non-trivially-copyable base %1}|"
----------------
erichkeane wrote:
The enum names here are inconsistent... `non-trivially-relocatable` took only `NR` whereas this is taking `NTC`. That said, I VASTLY prefer the `T` be present. Not in the scope here of course, but a followup tochange those `NR` to `NTR` perhaps is valuable.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/142341
More information about the cfe-commits
mailing list