[clang] [CIR] Upstream pointer arithmetic support (PR #138041)

[via cfe-commits]

github-actions[bot] wrote:

<!--LLVM CODE FORMAT COMMENT: {clang-format}-->


:warning: C/C++ code formatter, clang-format found issues in your code. :warning:

<details>
<summary>
You can test this locally with the following command:
</summary>

``````````bash
git-clang-format --diff HEAD~1 HEAD --extensions cpp,h -- clang/test/CIR/CodeGen/pointers.cpp clang/lib/CIR/CodeGen/CIRGenBuilder.h clang/lib/CIR/CodeGen/CIRGenExprScalar.cpp
``````````

</details>

<details>
<summary>
View the diff from clang-format here.
</summary>

``````````diff
diff --git a/clang/lib/CIR/CodeGen/CIRGenExprScalar.cpp b/clang/lib/CIR/CodeGen/CIRGenExprScalar.cpp
index cfd2d0d89..78eb3cbd4 100644
--- a/clang/lib/CIR/CodeGen/CIRGenExprScalar.cpp
+++ b/clang/lib/CIR/CodeGen/CIRGenExprScalar.cpp
@@ -1188,8 +1188,7 @@ static mlir::Value emitPointerArithmetic(CIRGenFunction &cgf,
   }
   assert(mlir::isa<cir::PointerType>(pointer.getType()) &&
          "Need a pointer operand");
-  assert(mlir::isa<cir::IntType>(index.getType()) &&
-         "Need an integer operand");
+  assert(mlir::isa<cir::IntType>(index.getType()) && "Need an integer operand");
 
   // Some versions of glibc and gcc use idioms (particularly in their malloc
   // routines) that add a pointer-sized integer (known to be a pointer value)

``````````

</details>


https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/138041