[clang] [clang][modules] Minor improvements to diagnosing `out of date` errors (PR #136612)
Cyndy Ishida via cfe-commits
cfe-commits at lists.llvm.org
Mon Apr 21 16:32:43 PDT 2025
================
@@ -3349,9 +3351,14 @@ ASTReader::ReadControlBlock(ModuleFile &F,
.getModuleCache()
.getInMemoryModuleCache()
.isPCMFinal(F.FileName);
- if (isDiagnosedResult(Result, Capabilities) || recompilingFinalized)
+ if (isDiagnosedResult(Result, Capabilities) || recompilingFinalized) {
Diag(diag::note_module_file_imported_by)
<< F.FileName << !F.ModuleName.empty() << F.ModuleName;
+ if (UseFilemap && !F.ModuleName.empty() && !StoredFile.empty() &&
+ StoredFile != ImportedFile)
----------------
cyndyishida wrote:
It's intentional, but I don't know that I understand why one is better than the other. What's the guideline or expectation here?
I think the note should still be reported if `StoredFile` doesn't exist. Are you thinking that creating a `FileEntry` would handle cases where different paths point to the same file?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/136612
More information about the cfe-commits
mailing list