[clang] 50d4ae4 - [analyzer] Fix format attribute handling in GenericTaintChecker (#132765)
via cfe-commits
cfe-commits at lists.llvm.org
Fri Mar 28 02:20:30 PDT 2025
Author: DonĂ¡t Nagy
Date: 2025-03-28T10:20:26+01:00
New Revision: 50d4ae4a62fb22e5e03a6150baaf80e4bb4f2d41
URL: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/50d4ae4a62fb22e5e03a6150baaf80e4bb4f2d41
DIFF: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/50d4ae4a62fb22e5e03a6150baaf80e4bb4f2d41.diff
LOG: [analyzer] Fix format attribute handling in GenericTaintChecker (#132765)
Previously `optin.taint.GenericTaint` misinterpreted the parameter
indices and produced false positives in situations when a [format
attribute](https://clang.llvm.org/docs/AttributeReference.html#format)
is applied on a non-static method. This commit fixes this bug
Added:
Modified:
clang/lib/StaticAnalyzer/Checkers/GenericTaintChecker.cpp
clang/test/Analysis/taint-generic.cpp
Removed:
################################################################################
diff --git a/clang/lib/StaticAnalyzer/Checkers/GenericTaintChecker.cpp b/clang/lib/StaticAnalyzer/Checkers/GenericTaintChecker.cpp
index b89a6e2588c98..1b61370a580d9 100644
--- a/clang/lib/StaticAnalyzer/Checkers/GenericTaintChecker.cpp
+++ b/clang/lib/StaticAnalyzer/Checkers/GenericTaintChecker.cpp
@@ -1080,7 +1080,23 @@ static bool getPrintfFormatArgumentNum(const CallEvent &Call,
const ArgIdxTy CallNumArgs = fromArgumentCount(Call.getNumArgs());
for (const auto *Format : FDecl->specific_attrs<FormatAttr>()) {
+ // The format attribute uses 1-based parameter indexing, for example
+ // plain `printf(const char *fmt, ...)` would be annotated with
+ // `__format__(__printf__, 1, 2)`, so we need to subtract 1 to get a
+ // 0-based index. (This checker uses 0-based parameter indices.)
ArgNum = Format->getFormatIdx() - 1;
+ // The format attribute also counts the implicit `this` parameter of
+ // methods, so e.g. in `SomeClass::method(const char *fmt, ...)` could be
+ // annotated with `__format__(__printf__, 2, 3)`. This checker doesn't
+ // count the implicit `this` parameter, so in this case we need to subtract
+ // one again.
+ // FIXME: Apparently the implementation of the format attribute doesn't
+ // support methods with an explicit object parameter, so we cannot
+ // implement proper support for that rare case either.
+ const CXXMethodDecl *MDecl = dyn_cast<CXXMethodDecl>(FDecl);
+ if (MDecl && !MDecl->isStatic())
+ ArgNum--;
+
if ((Format->getType()->getName() == "printf") && CallNumArgs > ArgNum)
return true;
}
diff --git a/clang/test/Analysis/taint-generic.cpp b/clang/test/Analysis/taint-generic.cpp
index 8836e1d3d2d98..c080313e4d172 100644
--- a/clang/test/Analysis/taint-generic.cpp
+++ b/clang/test/Analysis/taint-generic.cpp
@@ -161,3 +161,45 @@ void top() {
clang_analyzer_isTainted(A.data); // expected-warning {{YES}}
}
} // namespace gh114270
+
+
+namespace format_attribute {
+__attribute__((__format__ (__printf__, 1, 2)))
+void log_freefunc(const char *fmt, ...);
+
+void test_format_attribute_freefunc() {
+ int n;
+ fscanf(stdin, "%d", &n); // Get a tainted value.
+
+ log_freefunc("This number is suspicious: %d\n", n); // no-warning
+}
+
+struct Foo {
+ // When the format attribute is applied to a method, argumet '1' is the
+ // implicit `this`, so e.g. in this case argument '2' specifies `fmt`.
+ // Specifying '1' instead of '2' would produce a compilation error:
+ // "format attribute cannot specify the implicit this argument as the format string"
+ __attribute__((__format__ (__printf__, 2, 3)))
+ void log_method(const char *fmt, ...);
+
+ void test_format_attribute_method() {
+ int n;
+ fscanf(stdin, "%d", &n); // Get a tainted value.
+
+ // The analyzer used to misinterpret the parameter indices in the format
+ // attribute when the format attribute is applied to a method.
+ log_method("This number is suspicious: %d\n", n); // no-warning
+ }
+
+ __attribute__((__format__ (__printf__, 1, 2)))
+ static void log_static_method(const char *fmt, ...);
+
+ void test_format_attribute_static_method() {
+ int n;
+ fscanf(stdin, "%d", &n); // Get a tainted value.
+
+ log_static_method("This number is suspicious: %d\n", n); // no-warning
+ }
+};
+
+} // namespace format_attribute
More information about the cfe-commits
mailing list