[clang] [NFC][analyzer] Correct example code in VirtualCall docs (PR #131992)

[via cfe-commits]

llvmbot wrote:


<!--LLVM PR SUMMARY COMMENT-->
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang-static-analyzer-1

@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang

Author: Donát Nagy (NagyDonat)

<details>
<summary>Changes</summary>

Oops, I noticed these just after merging my commit 9762b8e1757601a719d926f7df77c207617adfdd.

---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/131992.diff


1 Files Affected:

- (modified) clang/docs/analyzer/checkers.rst (+2-2) 


``````````diff
diff --git a/clang/docs/analyzer/checkers.rst b/clang/docs/analyzer/checkers.rst
index f3243d002bd35..925f326730d4d 100644
--- a/clang/docs/analyzer/checkers.rst
+++ b/clang/docs/analyzer/checkers.rst
@@ -563,7 +563,7 @@ pure virtual – but may be still surprising for the programmer.)
 .. code-block:: cpp
 
  struct A {
-   virtual void getKind() = 0;
+   virtual int getKind() = 0;
 
    A() {
      // warn: This calls the pure virtual method A::getKind().
@@ -888,7 +888,7 @@ checker does not report them**.
 .. code-block:: cpp
 
  struct A {
-   virtual void getKind();
+   virtual int getKind();
 
    A() {
      // warn: This calls A::getKind() even if we are constructing an instance

``````````

</details>


https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/131992