[clang-tools-extra] [clang-tidy] add new check: modernize-use-scoped-lock (PR #126434)
Congcong Cai via cfe-commits
cfe-commits at lists.llvm.org
Tue Mar 11 19:05:55 PDT 2025
================
@@ -0,0 +1,326 @@
+//===--- UseScopedLockCheck.cpp - clang-tidy ------------------------------===//
+//
+// Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM Exceptions.
+// See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information.
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: Apache-2.0 WITH LLVM-exception
+//
+//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
+
+#include "UseScopedLockCheck.h"
+#include "clang/AST/ASTContext.h"
+#include "clang/AST/Decl.h"
+#include "clang/AST/Stmt.h"
+#include "clang/AST/Type.h"
+#include "clang/ASTMatchers/ASTMatchFinder.h"
+#include "clang/ASTMatchers/ASTMatchers.h"
+#include "clang/Basic/SourceLocation.h"
+#include "clang/Lex/Lexer.h"
+#include "llvm/ADT/SmallVector.h"
+#include "llvm/ADT/Twine.h"
+#include <iterator>
+
+using namespace clang::ast_matchers;
+
+namespace clang::tidy::modernize {
+
+namespace {
+
+bool isLockGuard(const QualType &Type) {
+ if (const auto *Record = Type->getAs<RecordType>()) {
+ if (const RecordDecl *Decl = Record->getDecl()) {
+ return Decl->getName() == "lock_guard" && Decl->isInStdNamespace();
+ }
+ }
+
+ if (const auto *TemplateSpecType =
+ Type->getAs<TemplateSpecializationType>()) {
+ if (const TemplateDecl *Decl =
+ TemplateSpecType->getTemplateName().getAsTemplateDecl()) {
+ return Decl->getName() == "lock_guard" && Decl->isInStdNamespace();
+ }
+ }
+
+ return false;
+}
+
+llvm::SmallVector<const VarDecl *> getLockGuardsFromDecl(const DeclStmt *DS) {
+ llvm::SmallVector<const VarDecl *> LockGuards;
+
+ for (const Decl *Decl : DS->decls()) {
+ if (const auto *VD = dyn_cast<VarDecl>(Decl)) {
+ const QualType Type =
+ VD->getType().getUnqualifiedType().getCanonicalType();
+ if (isLockGuard(Type)) {
+ LockGuards.push_back(VD);
+ }
+ }
+ }
+
+ return LockGuards;
+}
+
+// Scans through the statements in a block and groups consecutive
+// 'std::lock_guard' variable declarations together.
+llvm::SmallVector<llvm::SmallVector<const VarDecl *>>
+findLocksInCompoundStmt(const CompoundStmt *Block,
+ const ast_matchers::MatchFinder::MatchResult &Result) {
+ // store groups of consecutive 'std::lock_guard' declarations
+ llvm::SmallVector<llvm::SmallVector<const VarDecl *>> LockGuardGroups;
+ llvm::SmallVector<const VarDecl *> CurrentLockGuardGroup;
+
+ auto AddAndClearCurrentGroup = [&]() {
+ if (!CurrentLockGuardGroup.empty()) {
+ LockGuardGroups.push_back(CurrentLockGuardGroup);
+ CurrentLockGuardGroup.clear();
+ }
+ };
+
+ for (const Stmt *Stmt : Block->body()) {
+ if (const auto *DS = dyn_cast<DeclStmt>(Stmt)) {
+ llvm::SmallVector<const VarDecl *> LockGuards = getLockGuardsFromDecl(DS);
+
+ if (!LockGuards.empty()) {
+ CurrentLockGuardGroup.insert(
+ CurrentLockGuardGroup.end(),
+ std::make_move_iterator(LockGuards.begin()),
+ std::make_move_iterator(LockGuards.end()));
+ continue;
+ }
+ }
+ AddAndClearCurrentGroup();
+ }
+
+ AddAndClearCurrentGroup();
+
+ return LockGuardGroups;
+}
+
+TemplateSpecializationTypeLoc
+getTemplateLockGuardTypeLoc(const TypeSourceInfo *SourceInfo) {
+ const TypeLoc Loc = SourceInfo->getTypeLoc();
+
+ const auto ElaboratedLoc = Loc.getAs<ElaboratedTypeLoc>();
+ if (!ElaboratedLoc)
+ return {};
+
+ return ElaboratedLoc.getNamedTypeLoc().getAs<TemplateSpecializationTypeLoc>();
+}
+
+// Find the exact source range of the 'lock_guard' token
+SourceRange getLockGuardRange(const TypeSourceInfo *SourceInfo) {
+ const TypeLoc LockGuardTypeLoc = SourceInfo->getTypeLoc();
+
+ return SourceRange(LockGuardTypeLoc.getBeginLoc(),
+ LockGuardTypeLoc.getEndLoc());
+}
+
+// Find the exact source range of the 'lock_guard' name token
+SourceRange getLockGuardNameRange(const TypeSourceInfo *SourceInfo) {
+ const TemplateSpecializationTypeLoc TemplateLoc =
+ getTemplateLockGuardTypeLoc(SourceInfo);
+ if (!TemplateLoc)
+ return {};
+
+ return SourceRange(TemplateLoc.getTemplateNameLoc(),
+ TemplateLoc.getLAngleLoc().getLocWithOffset(-1));
+}
+
+const StringRef UseScopedLockMessage =
+ "use 'std::scoped_lock' instead of 'std::lock_guard'";
+
+} // namespace
+
+UseScopedLockCheck::UseScopedLockCheck(StringRef Name,
+ ClangTidyContext *Context)
+ : ClangTidyCheck(Name, Context),
+ WarnOnSingleLocks(Options.get("WarnOnSingleLocks", true)),
+ WarnOnUsingAndTypedef(Options.get("WarnOnUsingAndTypedef", true)) {}
+
+void UseScopedLockCheck::storeOptions(ClangTidyOptions::OptionMap &Opts) {
+ Options.store(Opts, "WarnOnSingleLocks", WarnOnSingleLocks);
+ Options.store(Opts, "WarnOnUsingAndTypedef", WarnOnUsingAndTypedef);
+}
+
+void UseScopedLockCheck::registerMatchers(MatchFinder *Finder) {
+ const auto LockGuardClassDecl =
+ namedDecl(hasName("lock_guard"), isInStdNamespace());
+
+ const auto LockGuardType = qualType(anyOf(
+ hasUnqualifiedDesugaredType(
+ recordType(hasDeclaration(LockGuardClassDecl))),
+ elaboratedType(namesType(hasUnqualifiedDesugaredType(
+ templateSpecializationType(hasDeclaration(LockGuardClassDecl)))))));
+
+ const auto LockVarDecl = varDecl(hasType(LockGuardType));
+
+ if (WarnOnSingleLocks) {
+ // Match CompoundStmt with only one 'std::lock_guard'
+ Finder->addMatcher(
+ compoundStmt(unless(isExpansionInSystemHeader()),
+ has(declStmt(has(LockVarDecl.bind("lock-decl-single")))),
+ unless(hasDescendant(declStmt(has(varDecl(
+ hasType(LockGuardType),
+ unless(equalsBoundNode("lock-decl-single")))))))),
+ this);
----------------
HerrCai0907 wrote:
make sure handle the lambda correctly. A common bug of `hasDescendant` is match statement inside lambda also.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/126434
More information about the cfe-commits
mailing list