[clang] Diagnose potential size confusion with VLA params (PR #129772)
via cfe-commits
cfe-commits at lists.llvm.org
Wed Mar 5 00:28:10 PST 2025
================
@@ -10333,6 +10334,74 @@ Sema::ActOnFunctionDeclarator(Scope *S, Declarator &D, DeclContext *DC,
}
}
+ // Loop over the parameters to see if any of the size expressions contains
+ // a DeclRefExpr which refers to a variable from an outer scope that is
+ // also named later in the parameter list.
+ // e.g., int n; void func(int array[n], int n);
+ SmallVector<const DeclRefExpr *, 2> DRESizeExprs;
+ llvm::for_each(Params, [&](const ParmVarDecl *Param) {
+ // If we have any size expressions we need to check against, check them
+ // now.
+ for (const auto *DRE : DRESizeExprs) {
+ // Check to see if this parameter has the same name as one of the
+ // DeclRefExprs we wanted to test against. If so, then we found a
+ // situation where an earlier parameter refers to the name of a later
+ // parameter, which is (currently) only valid if there's a variable
+ // from an outer scope with the same name.
+ if (const auto *SizeExprND = dyn_cast<NamedDecl>(DRE->getDecl())) {
+ if (SizeExprND->getIdentifier() == Param->getIdentifier()) {
+ // Diagnose the DeclRefExpr from the parameter with the size
+ // expression.
+ Diag(DRE->getLocation(), diag::warn_vla_size_expr_shadow);
+ // Note the parameter that a user could be confused into thinking
+ // they're referring to.
+ Diag(Param->getLocation(), diag::note_vla_size_expr_shadow_param);
+ // Note the DeclRefExpr that's actually being used.
+ Diag(DRE->getDecl()->getLocation(),
+ diag::note_vla_size_expr_shadow_actual);
+ }
+ }
+ }
+
+ // To check whether its size expression is a simple DeclRefExpr, we first
+ // have to walk through pointers or references, but array types always
+ // decay to a pointer, so skip if this is a DecayedType.
+ QualType QT = Param->getType();
+ while (!isa<DecayedType>(QT.getTypePtr()) &&
+ (QT->isPointerType() || QT->isReferenceType()))
+ QT = QT->getPointeeType();
----------------
cor3ntin wrote:
There isn't already a way to do that?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/129772
More information about the cfe-commits
mailing list