[clang] [HLSL] Implement the 'and' HLSL function (PR #127098)
Deric Cheung via cfe-commits
cfe-commits at lists.llvm.org
Fri Feb 14 15:33:39 PST 2025
================
@@ -2245,6 +2245,17 @@ bool SemaHLSL::CheckBuiltinFunctionCall(unsigned BuiltinID, CallExpr *TheCall) {
break;
}
+ case Builtin::BI__builtin_hlsl_and: {
+ if (SemaRef.checkArgCount(TheCall, 2))
+ return true;
+ if (CheckVectorElementCallArgs(&SemaRef, TheCall))
+ return true;
+ ExprResult A = TheCall->getArg(0);
----------------
Icohedron wrote:
I think it's just difference in wording. I'm pretty sure we are talking about the same thing? If you pass a non-bool type into `__builtin_hlsl_and` then it will be implicitly converted to a bool. Hence "any type that can be implicitly cast to a bool (vector) are allowed to be passed" into it.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/127098
More information about the cfe-commits
mailing list