[clang] [clang][analyzer] fix false positive of BlockInCriticalSectionChecker (PR #126752)

Gábor Horváth via cfe-commits cfe-commits at lists.llvm.org
Wed Feb 12 02:36:12 PST 2025


================
@@ -339,6 +425,36 @@ void BlockInCriticalSectionChecker::reportBlockInCritSection(
                                                     os.str(), ErrNode);
   R->addRange(Call.getSourceRange());
   R->markInteresting(Call.getReturnValue());
+  // for 'read' call, check whether it's file descriptor(first argument) is
+  // created by 'open' API with O_NONBLOCK flag and don't report for this
+  // situation.
+  if (Call.getCalleeIdentifier()->getName() == "read") {
+    do {
+      const auto *arg = Call.getArgExpr(0);
----------------
Xazax-hun wrote:

Nit: I know the function is not consistent  at the moment but the coding convention requires variable names to start with an uppercase letter. 

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/126752


More information about the cfe-commits mailing list