[clang] [clang][X86] Support __attribute__((model("small"/"large"))) (PR #124834)

[Arthur Eubanks via cfe-commits]

================
@@ -1,64 +1,40 @@
-// RUN: %clang_cc1 -triple aarch64 -verify=expected,aarch64 -fsyntax-only %s
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -triple aarch64 -verify=expected,unsupported -fsyntax-only %s
 // RUN: %clang_cc1 -triple loongarch64 -verify=expected,loongarch64 -fsyntax-only %s
-// RUN: %clang_cc1 -triple mips64 -verify=expected,mips64 -fsyntax-only %s
-// RUN: %clang_cc1 -triple powerpc64 -verify=expected,powerpc64 -fsyntax-only %s
-// RUN: %clang_cc1 -triple riscv64 -verify=expected,riscv64 -fsyntax-only %s
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -triple mips64 -verify=expected,unsupported -fsyntax-only %s
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -triple powerpc64 -verify=expected,unsupported -fsyntax-only %s
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -triple riscv64 -verify=expected,unsupported -fsyntax-only %s
 // RUN: %clang_cc1 -triple x86_64 -verify=expected,x86_64 -fsyntax-only %s
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -triple nvptx64-unknown-cuda -fcuda-is-device -x cuda -verify=expected,unsupported -fsyntax-only %s
----------------
aeubanks wrote:

I see, although it seems pretty annoying to have to special case NVPTX compilations. Is there a previous example of having done something like this, or should I just ad-hoc skip the Sema code for NVPTX compilations?

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/124834