[clang] [clang] Fix dangling false positives for conditional operators. (PR #120233)

Haojian Wu via cfe-commits cfe-commits at lists.llvm.org
Tue Dec 17 05:47:11 PST 2024


================
@@ -582,6 +582,15 @@ static void visitFunctionCallArguments(IndirectLocalPath &Path, Expr *Call,
     //   Temp().ptr; // Here ptr might not dangle.
     if (isa<MemberExpr>(Arg->IgnoreImpCasts()))
       return;
+    // Avoid false positives when the object is constructed from a conditional
+    // operator argument. A common case is:
+    //   // 'ptr' might not be owned by the Owner object.
+    //   std::string_view s = cond() ? Owner().ptr : sv;
----------------
hokein wrote:

note: I keep the code simple here, and heuristic logic is not perfect and may lead to false negatives, as it filters out more cases than intended. The major case `std::string_view sv = cond ? "123" : std::string();` is still covered, I think this is a right tradeoff.

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/120233


More information about the cfe-commits mailing list