[clang] [clang][NFC] simplify the unset check in `ParseLabeledStatement` (PR #117430)
via cfe-commits
cfe-commits at lists.llvm.org
Sat Nov 23 03:54:15 PST 2024
llvmbot wrote:
<!--LLVM PR SUMMARY COMMENT-->
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Congcong Cai (HerrCai0907)
<details>
<summary>Changes</summary>
`!isInvalid && !isUsable -> !isInvalid && !(!isInvalid && !isUnset) -> isUnset`
It is more simple to understand.
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/117430.diff
1 Files Affected:
- (modified) clang/lib/Parse/ParseStmt.cpp (+1-1)
``````````diff
diff --git a/clang/lib/Parse/ParseStmt.cpp b/clang/lib/Parse/ParseStmt.cpp
index f6d787a0c88319..cd4504630f8719 100644
--- a/clang/lib/Parse/ParseStmt.cpp
+++ b/clang/lib/Parse/ParseStmt.cpp
@@ -799,7 +799,7 @@ StmtResult Parser::ParseLabeledStatement(ParsedAttributes &Attrs,
}
// If we've not parsed a statement yet, parse one now.
- if (!SubStmt.isInvalid() && !SubStmt.isUsable())
+ if (SubStmt.isUnset())
SubStmt = ParseStatement(nullptr, StmtCtx);
// Broken substmt shouldn't prevent the label from being added to the AST.
``````````
</details>
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/117430
More information about the cfe-commits
mailing list