[clang] Clarify use of contractions in diagnostic messages (PR #116803)

[via cfe-commits]

================
@@ -160,6 +160,10 @@ wording a diagnostic.
   named in a diagnostic message. e.g., prefer wording like ``'this' pointer
   cannot be null in well-defined C++ code`` over wording like ``this pointer
   cannot be null in well-defined C++ code``.
+* Prefer diagnostic wording without contractions whenever possible. The single
+  quote in a contraction can be visually distracting due to its use with
+  syntactic constructs and contractions can be harder to understand for non-
+  native English speakers.
----------------
Sirraide wrote:

> `cannot` is a formally 'correct' way of saying it

Well, ‘cannot’ and ‘can not’ mean different things, and yeah, usually, ‘cannot’ is what you want. I don’t think ‘can not’ would be too common in a diagnostic because we those are typically not about something you’re allowed not to do...

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/116803