[clang-tools-extra] [clang-tidy] Filter out googletest TUs in bugprone-unchecked-optional-access (PR #115051)

Jan Voung via cfe-commits cfe-commits at lists.llvm.org
Mon Nov 11 19:13:20 PST 2024


https://github.com/jvoung updated https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/115051

>From 8d83ec25ccdedad5f6a48e4a23176435f71a3e72 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jan Voung <jvoung at gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 5 Nov 2024 19:20:36 +0000
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] [clang-tidy] Filter out googletest TUs in
 bugprone-unchecked-optional-access

We currently do not handle ASSERT_TRUE(opt.has_value()) macros from
googletest (and other macros), so would see lots of false positives
in test TUs.
---
 .../bugprone/UncheckedOptionalAccessCheck.cpp | 19 ++++++++++++++-
 .../bugprone/UncheckedOptionalAccessCheck.h   |  8 ++++++-
 .../unchecked-optional-access/gtest/gtest.h   | 24 +++++++++++++++++++
 ...cked-optional-access-ignore-googletest.cpp | 24 +++++++++++++++++++
 4 files changed, 73 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
 create mode 100644 clang-tools-extra/test/clang-tidy/checkers/bugprone/Inputs/unchecked-optional-access/gtest/gtest.h
 create mode 100644 clang-tools-extra/test/clang-tidy/checkers/bugprone/unchecked-optional-access-ignore-googletest.cpp

diff --git a/clang-tools-extra/clang-tidy/bugprone/UncheckedOptionalAccessCheck.cpp b/clang-tools-extra/clang-tidy/bugprone/UncheckedOptionalAccessCheck.cpp
index 0a0e212f345ed8..06deea0a446809 100644
--- a/clang-tools-extra/clang-tidy/bugprone/UncheckedOptionalAccessCheck.cpp
+++ b/clang-tools-extra/clang-tidy/bugprone/UncheckedOptionalAccessCheck.cpp
@@ -40,10 +40,27 @@ void UncheckedOptionalAccessCheck::registerMatchers(MatchFinder *Finder) {
       this);
 }
 
+void UncheckedOptionalAccessCheck::onStartOfTranslationUnit() {
+  // Reset the flag for each TU.
+  is_test_tu_ = false;
+}
+
 void UncheckedOptionalAccessCheck::check(
     const MatchFinder::MatchResult &Result) {
-  if (Result.SourceManager->getDiagnostics().hasUncompilableErrorOccurred())
+  // The googletest assertion macros are not currently recognized, so we have
+  // many false positives in tests. So, do not check functions in a test TU.
+  if (is_test_tu_ ||
+      Result.SourceManager->getDiagnostics().hasUncompilableErrorOccurred())
+    return;
+
+  // Look for two (public) googletest macros; if found, we'll mark this TU as a
+  // test TU. We look for ASSERT_TRUE because it is a problematic macro that
+  // we don't (yet) support, and GTEST_TEST to disambiguate ASSERT_TRUE.
+  if (Result.Context->Idents.get("ASSERT_TRUE").hasMacroDefinition() &&
+      Result.Context->Idents.get("GTEST_TEST").hasMacroDefinition()) {
+    is_test_tu_ = true;
     return;
+  }
 
   const auto *FuncDecl = Result.Nodes.getNodeAs<FunctionDecl>(FuncID);
   if (FuncDecl->isTemplated())
diff --git a/clang-tools-extra/clang-tidy/bugprone/UncheckedOptionalAccessCheck.h b/clang-tools-extra/clang-tidy/bugprone/UncheckedOptionalAccessCheck.h
index 2d1570f7df8abb..3bd7ff9867b145 100644
--- a/clang-tools-extra/clang-tidy/bugprone/UncheckedOptionalAccessCheck.h
+++ b/clang-tools-extra/clang-tidy/bugprone/UncheckedOptionalAccessCheck.h
@@ -12,7 +12,6 @@
 #include "../ClangTidyCheck.h"
 #include "clang/ASTMatchers/ASTMatchFinder.h"
 #include "clang/Analysis/FlowSensitive/Models/UncheckedOptionalAccessModel.h"
-#include <optional>
 
 namespace clang::tidy::bugprone {
 
@@ -30,6 +29,7 @@ class UncheckedOptionalAccessCheck : public ClangTidyCheck {
             Options.getLocalOrGlobal("IgnoreSmartPointerDereference", false)} {}
   void registerMatchers(ast_matchers::MatchFinder *Finder) override;
   void check(const ast_matchers::MatchFinder::MatchResult &Result) override;
+  void onStartOfTranslationUnit() override;
   bool isLanguageVersionSupported(const LangOptions &LangOpts) const override {
     return LangOpts.CPlusPlus;
   }
@@ -40,6 +40,12 @@ class UncheckedOptionalAccessCheck : public ClangTidyCheck {
 
 private:
   dataflow::UncheckedOptionalAccessModelOptions ModelOptions;
+
+  // Records whether the current TU includes the googletest headers, in which
+  // case we assume it is a test TU of some sort. The googletest assertion
+  // macros are not currently recognized, so we have many false positives in
+  // tests. So, we disable checking for all test TUs.
+  bool is_test_tu_ = false;
 };
 
 } // namespace clang::tidy::bugprone
diff --git a/clang-tools-extra/test/clang-tidy/checkers/bugprone/Inputs/unchecked-optional-access/gtest/gtest.h b/clang-tools-extra/test/clang-tidy/checkers/bugprone/Inputs/unchecked-optional-access/gtest/gtest.h
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000000..8a9eeac94dbb77
--- /dev/null
+++ b/clang-tools-extra/test/clang-tidy/checkers/bugprone/Inputs/unchecked-optional-access/gtest/gtest.h
@@ -0,0 +1,24 @@
+#ifndef LLVM_CLANG_TOOLS_EXTRA_TEST_CLANG_TIDY_CHECKERS_INPUTS_GTEST_GTEST_H_
+#define LLVM_CLANG_TOOLS_EXTRA_TEST_CLANG_TIDY_CHECKERS_INPUTS_GTEST_GTEST_H_
+
+// Mock version of googletest macros.
+
+#define GTEST_TEST(test_suite_name, test_name)                                 \
+  class GTEST_TEST_CLASS_NAME_(test_suite_name, test_name) {                   \
+  public:                                                                      \
+    GTEST_TEST_CLASS_NAME_(test_suite_name, test_name)() = default;            \
+  };
+
+#define GTEST_AMBIGUOUS_ELSE_BLOCKER_                                          \
+  switch (0)                                                                   \
+  case 0:                                                                      \
+  default: // NOLINT
+
+#define ASSERT_TRUE(condition)                                                 \
+  GTEST_AMBIGUOUS_ELSE_BLOCKER_                                                \
+  if (condition)                                                               \
+    ;                                                                          \
+  else                                                                         \
+    return;  // should fail...
+
+#endif  // LLVM_CLANG_TOOLS_EXTRA_TEST_CLANG_TIDY_CHECKERS_INPUTS_GTEST_GTEST_H_
diff --git a/clang-tools-extra/test/clang-tidy/checkers/bugprone/unchecked-optional-access-ignore-googletest.cpp b/clang-tools-extra/test/clang-tidy/checkers/bugprone/unchecked-optional-access-ignore-googletest.cpp
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000000..2f213434d0ad61
--- /dev/null
+++ b/clang-tools-extra/test/clang-tidy/checkers/bugprone/unchecked-optional-access-ignore-googletest.cpp
@@ -0,0 +1,24 @@
+// RUN: %check_clang_tidy %s bugprone-unchecked-optional-access %t -- -- -I %S/Inputs/unchecked-optional-access
+
+#include "absl/types/optional.h"
+#include "gtest/gtest.h"
+
+// All of the warnings are suppressed once we detect that we are in a test TU
+// even the unchecked_value_access case.
+
+// CHECK-MESSAGE: 1 warning generated
+// CHECK-MESSAGES: Suppressed 1 warnings
+
+void unchecked_value_access(const absl::optional<int> &opt) {
+  opt.value();
+}
+
+void assert_true_check_operator_access(const absl::optional<int> &opt) {
+  ASSERT_TRUE(opt.has_value());
+  *opt;
+}
+
+void assert_true_check_value_access(const absl::optional<int> &opt) {
+  ASSERT_TRUE(opt.has_value());
+  opt.value();
+}

>From 3427fa73c174ccdc68b703c20c0ab40a7418e955 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jan Voung <jvoung at gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 5 Nov 2024 19:29:28 +0000
Subject: [PATCH 2/3] Add one more missing macro

---
 .../bugprone/Inputs/unchecked-optional-access/gtest/gtest.h    | 3 +++
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)

diff --git a/clang-tools-extra/test/clang-tidy/checkers/bugprone/Inputs/unchecked-optional-access/gtest/gtest.h b/clang-tools-extra/test/clang-tidy/checkers/bugprone/Inputs/unchecked-optional-access/gtest/gtest.h
index 8a9eeac94dbb77..ba865dfc5a966f 100644
--- a/clang-tools-extra/test/clang-tidy/checkers/bugprone/Inputs/unchecked-optional-access/gtest/gtest.h
+++ b/clang-tools-extra/test/clang-tidy/checkers/bugprone/Inputs/unchecked-optional-access/gtest/gtest.h
@@ -3,6 +3,9 @@
 
 // Mock version of googletest macros.
 
+#define GTEST_TEST_CLASS_NAME_(test_suite_name, test_name)                     \
+  test_suite_name##_##test_name##_Test
+
 #define GTEST_TEST(test_suite_name, test_name)                                 \
   class GTEST_TEST_CLASS_NAME_(test_suite_name, test_name) {                   \
   public:                                                                      \

>From 2611af1a9a7ecb007d0f0f735d0b7b1581a0f1b1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jan Voung <jvoung at gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 6 Nov 2024 22:10:28 +0000
Subject: [PATCH 3/3] Simplify the mock a bit more

The implementation doesn't matter as much for testing, since the
currently skipping is keying on some top-level macros.
---
 .../unchecked-optional-access/gtest/gtest.h   | 21 ++++++-------------
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)

diff --git a/clang-tools-extra/test/clang-tidy/checkers/bugprone/Inputs/unchecked-optional-access/gtest/gtest.h b/clang-tools-extra/test/clang-tidy/checkers/bugprone/Inputs/unchecked-optional-access/gtest/gtest.h
index ba865dfc5a966f..e3b545c01d2fa1 100644
--- a/clang-tools-extra/test/clang-tidy/checkers/bugprone/Inputs/unchecked-optional-access/gtest/gtest.h
+++ b/clang-tools-extra/test/clang-tidy/checkers/bugprone/Inputs/unchecked-optional-access/gtest/gtest.h
@@ -3,25 +3,16 @@
 
 // Mock version of googletest macros.
 
-#define GTEST_TEST_CLASS_NAME_(test_suite_name, test_name)                     \
-  test_suite_name##_##test_name##_Test
-
-#define GTEST_TEST(test_suite_name, test_name)                                 \
-  class GTEST_TEST_CLASS_NAME_(test_suite_name, test_name) {                   \
-  public:                                                                      \
-    GTEST_TEST_CLASS_NAME_(test_suite_name, test_name)() = default;            \
-  };
-
-#define GTEST_AMBIGUOUS_ELSE_BLOCKER_                                          \
-  switch (0)                                                                   \
-  case 0:                                                                      \
-  default: // NOLINT
+// Normally this declares a class, but it isn't relevant for testing.
+#define GTEST_TEST(test_suite_name, test_name)
 
+// Normally, this has a relatively complex implementation
+// (wrapping the condition evaluation), more complex failure behavior, etc.,
+// but we keep it simple for testing.
 #define ASSERT_TRUE(condition)                                                 \
-  GTEST_AMBIGUOUS_ELSE_BLOCKER_                                                \
   if (condition)                                                               \
     ;                                                                          \
   else                                                                         \
-    return;  // should fail...
+    return;  // normally "fails" rather than just return
 
 #endif  // LLVM_CLANG_TOOLS_EXTRA_TEST_CLANG_TIDY_CHECKERS_INPUTS_GTEST_GTEST_H_



More information about the cfe-commits mailing list