[clang] [Clang] Fix name lookup for dependent bases (PR #114978)

[Vladislav Belov via cfe-commits]

https://github.com/vbe-sc updated https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/114978

>From 66f3465737a99a002310b707f7783698adef253a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: vb-sc <vladislav.belov at syntacore.com>
Date: Tue, 5 Nov 2024 15:46:57 +0300
Subject: [PATCH] [clang] Fix name lookup for dependent bases

---
 clang/lib/AST/CXXInheritance.cpp | 10 +++++-----
 clang/test/CXX/drs/cwg5xx.cpp    |  8 ++++++--
 2 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/clang/lib/AST/CXXInheritance.cpp b/clang/lib/AST/CXXInheritance.cpp
index eb265a872c1259..9b1bcaa88e129e 100644
--- a/clang/lib/AST/CXXInheritance.cpp
+++ b/clang/lib/AST/CXXInheritance.cpp
@@ -169,6 +169,7 @@ bool CXXBasePaths::lookupInBases(ASTContext &Context,
     // Find the record of the base class subobjects for this type.
     QualType BaseType =
         Context.getCanonicalType(BaseSpec.getType()).getUnqualifiedType();
+    bool isCurrentInstantiation = isa<InjectedClassNameType>(BaseType);
 
     // C++ [temp.dep]p3:
     //   In the definition of a class template or a member of a class template,
@@ -176,7 +177,8 @@ bool CXXBasePaths::lookupInBases(ASTContext &Context,
     //   the base class scope is not examined during unqualified name lookup
     //   either at the point of definition of the class template or member or
     //   during an instantiation of the class tem- plate or member.
-    if (!LookupInDependent && BaseType->isDependentType())
+    if (!LookupInDependent &&
+        (BaseType->isDependentType() && !isCurrentInstantiation))
       continue;
 
     // Determine whether we need to visit this base class at all,
@@ -244,9 +246,8 @@ bool CXXBasePaths::lookupInBases(ASTContext &Context,
         return FoundPath;
       }
     } else if (VisitBase) {
-      CXXRecordDecl *BaseRecord;
+      CXXRecordDecl *BaseRecord = nullptr;
       if (LookupInDependent) {
-        BaseRecord = nullptr;
         const TemplateSpecializationType *TST =
             BaseSpec.getType()->getAs<TemplateSpecializationType>();
         if (!TST) {
@@ -265,8 +266,7 @@ bool CXXBasePaths::lookupInBases(ASTContext &Context,
             BaseRecord = nullptr;
         }
       } else {
-        BaseRecord = cast<CXXRecordDecl>(
-            BaseSpec.getType()->castAs<RecordType>()->getDecl());
+        BaseRecord = cast<CXXRecordDecl>(BaseSpec.getType()->getAsRecordDecl());
       }
       if (BaseRecord &&
           lookupInBases(Context, BaseRecord, BaseMatches, LookupInDependent)) {
diff --git a/clang/test/CXX/drs/cwg5xx.cpp b/clang/test/CXX/drs/cwg5xx.cpp
index ed0c7159dfc889..b283684aef2f7e 100644
--- a/clang/test/CXX/drs/cwg5xx.cpp
+++ b/clang/test/CXX/drs/cwg5xx.cpp
@@ -1178,17 +1178,21 @@ namespace cwg590 { // cwg590: yes
   template<typename T> typename A<T>::B::C A<T>::B::C::f(A<T>::B::C) {}
 }
 
-namespace cwg591 { // cwg591: no
+namespace cwg591 { // cwg591: yes
   template<typename T> struct A {
     typedef int M;
     struct B {
       typedef void M;
       struct C;
+      struct D;
     };
   };
 
   template<typename T> struct A<T>::B::C : A<T> {
-    // FIXME: Should find member of non-dependent base class A<T>.
+    M m;
+  };
+
+  template<typename T> struct A<T>::B::D : A<T*> {
     M m;
     // expected-error at -1 {{field has incomplete type 'M' (aka 'void'}}
   };