[clang-tools-extra] [clangd] [Modules] Support Reusable Modules Builder (PR #106683)

[Chuanqi Xu via cfe-commits]

================
@@ -316,36 +287,169 @@ llvm::Error buildModuleFile(llvm::StringRef ModuleName,
   if (Clang->getDiagnostics().hasErrorOccurred())
     return llvm::createStringError("Compilation failed");
 
-  BuiltModuleFiles.addModuleFile(ModuleName, Inputs.CompileCommand.Output);
-  return llvm::Error::success();
+  return ModuleFile{ModuleName, Inputs.CompileCommand.Output};
+}
+
+bool ReusablePrerequisiteModules::canReuse(
+    const CompilerInvocation &CI,
+    llvm::IntrusiveRefCntPtr<llvm::vfs::FileSystem> VFS) const {
+  if (RequiredModules.empty())
+    return true;
+
+  SmallVector<StringRef> BMIPaths;
+  for (auto &MF : RequiredModules)
+    BMIPaths.push_back(MF->ModuleFilePath);
+  return IsModuleFilesUpToDate(BMIPaths, *this, VFS);
 }
 } // namespace
 
+class ModulesBuilder::ModuleFileCache {
+public:
+  ModuleFileCache(const GlobalCompilationDatabase &CDB) : CDB(CDB) {}
+
+  llvm::Error
+  getOrBuildModuleFile(StringRef ModuleName, const ThreadsafeFS &TFS,
+                       ProjectModules &MDB,
+                       ReusablePrerequisiteModules &RequiredModules);
+  const GlobalCompilationDatabase &getCDB() const { return CDB; }
+
+private:
+  std::shared_ptr<ModuleFile>
+  getValidModuleFile(StringRef ModuleName, ProjectModules &MDB,
+                     const ThreadsafeFS &TFS,
+                     PrerequisiteModules &BuiltModuleFiles);
+
+  /// This should only be called by getValidModuleFile. This is unlocked version
+  /// of getValidModuleFile. The function is extracted to avoid dead locks when
+  /// recursing.
+  std::shared_ptr<ModuleFile>
+  isValidModuleFileUnlocked(StringRef ModuleName, ProjectModules &MDB,
+                            const ThreadsafeFS &TFS,
+                            PrerequisiteModules &BuiltModuleFiles);
+
+  const GlobalCompilationDatabase &CDB;
+
+  llvm::StringMap<std::shared_ptr<ModuleFile>> ModuleFiles;
----------------
ChuanqiXu9 wrote:

Got your points. Although I feel there are spaces to optimize, let's follow the current clangd's style.

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/106683