[clang-tools-extra] Enforce SL.con.3: Add check to replace operator[] with at() [Cont.] (PR #95220)
Paul Heidekrüger via cfe-commits
cfe-commits at lists.llvm.org
Mon Nov 4 02:12:06 PST 2024
https://github.com/paulhdk updated https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/95220
>From 41653af2c434b9c3e6df15db7d7f3d66a9fecbe3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Sebastian Wolf <wolf.sebastian at in.tum.de>
Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2024 16:16:35 +0200
Subject: [PATCH 01/48] Enforce SL.con.3: Add check to replace operator[] with
at() on std containers
---
.../AvoidBoundsErrorsCheck.cpp | 81 +++++++++++++++++++
.../AvoidBoundsErrorsCheck.h | 32 ++++++++
.../cppcoreguidelines/CMakeLists.txt | 1 +
.../CppCoreGuidelinesTidyModule.cpp | 3 +
clang-tools-extra/docs/ReleaseNotes.rst | 5 ++
.../cppcoreguidelines/avoid-bounds-errors.rst | 20 +++++
.../docs/clang-tidy/checks/list.rst | 1 +
.../cppcoreguidelines/avoid-bounds-errors.cpp | 66 +++++++++++++++
8 files changed, 209 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 clang-tools-extra/clang-tidy/cppcoreguidelines/AvoidBoundsErrorsCheck.cpp
create mode 100644 clang-tools-extra/clang-tidy/cppcoreguidelines/AvoidBoundsErrorsCheck.h
create mode 100644 clang-tools-extra/docs/clang-tidy/checks/cppcoreguidelines/avoid-bounds-errors.rst
create mode 100644 clang-tools-extra/test/clang-tidy/checkers/cppcoreguidelines/avoid-bounds-errors.cpp
diff --git a/clang-tools-extra/clang-tidy/cppcoreguidelines/AvoidBoundsErrorsCheck.cpp b/clang-tools-extra/clang-tidy/cppcoreguidelines/AvoidBoundsErrorsCheck.cpp
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000000..524c21b5bdb818
--- /dev/null
+++ b/clang-tools-extra/clang-tidy/cppcoreguidelines/AvoidBoundsErrorsCheck.cpp
@@ -0,0 +1,81 @@
+//===--- AvoidBoundsErrorsCheck.cpp - clang-tidy --------------------------===//
+//
+// Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM Exceptions.
+// See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information.
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: Apache-2.0 WITH LLVM-exception
+//
+//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
+
+#include "AvoidBoundsErrorsCheck.h"
+#include "clang/ASTMatchers/ASTMatchFinder.h"
+#include "clang/Lex/Lexer.h"
+
+#include <iostream>
+using namespace clang::ast_matchers;
+
+namespace clang::tidy::cppcoreguidelines {
+
+bool isApplicable(const QualType &Type) {
+ const auto TypeStr = Type.getAsString();
+ bool Result = false;
+ // Only check for containers in the std namespace
+ if (TypeStr.find("std::vector") != std::string::npos) {
+ Result = true;
+ }
+ if (TypeStr.find("std::array") != std::string::npos) {
+ Result = true;
+ }
+ if (TypeStr.find("std::deque") != std::string::npos) {
+ Result = true;
+ }
+ if (TypeStr.find("std::map") != std::string::npos) {
+ Result = true;
+ }
+ if (TypeStr.find("std::unordered_map") != std::string::npos) {
+ Result = true;
+ }
+ if (TypeStr.find("std::flat_map") != std::string::npos) {
+ Result = true;
+ }
+ // TODO Add std::span with C++26
+ return Result;
+}
+
+void AvoidBoundsErrorsCheck::registerMatchers(MatchFinder *Finder) {
+ Finder->addMatcher(
+ callExpr(callee(cxxMethodDecl(hasName("operator[]")).bind("f")))
+ .bind("x"),
+ this);
+}
+
+void AvoidBoundsErrorsCheck::check(const MatchFinder::MatchResult &Result) {
+ const ASTContext &Context = *Result.Context;
+ const SourceManager &Source = Context.getSourceManager();
+ const auto *MatchedExpr = Result.Nodes.getNodeAs<CallExpr>("x");
+ const auto *MatchedFunction = Result.Nodes.getNodeAs<CXXMethodDecl>("f");
+ const auto Type = MatchedFunction->getThisType();
+ if (!isApplicable(Type)) {
+ return;
+ }
+
+ // Get original code.
+ const SourceLocation b(MatchedExpr->getBeginLoc());
+ const SourceLocation e(MatchedExpr->getEndLoc());
+ const std::string OriginalCode =
+ Lexer::getSourceText(CharSourceRange::getTokenRange(b, e), Source,
+ getLangOpts())
+ .str();
+ const auto Range = SourceRange(b, e);
+
+ // Build replacement.
+ std::string NewCode = OriginalCode;
+ const auto BeginOpen = NewCode.find("[");
+ NewCode.replace(BeginOpen, 1, ".at(");
+ const auto BeginClose = NewCode.find("]");
+ NewCode.replace(BeginClose, 1, ")");
+
+ diag(MatchedExpr->getBeginLoc(), "Do not use operator[], use at() instead.")
+ << FixItHint::CreateReplacement(Range, NewCode);
+}
+
+} // namespace clang::tidy::cppcoreguidelines
diff --git a/clang-tools-extra/clang-tidy/cppcoreguidelines/AvoidBoundsErrorsCheck.h b/clang-tools-extra/clang-tidy/cppcoreguidelines/AvoidBoundsErrorsCheck.h
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000000..f915729cd7bbee
--- /dev/null
+++ b/clang-tools-extra/clang-tidy/cppcoreguidelines/AvoidBoundsErrorsCheck.h
@@ -0,0 +1,32 @@
+//===--- AvoidBoundsErrorsCheck.h - clang-tidy ------------------*- C++ -*-===//
+//
+// Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM Exceptions.
+// See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information.
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: Apache-2.0 WITH LLVM-exception
+//
+//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
+
+#ifndef LLVM_CLANG_TOOLS_EXTRA_CLANG_TIDY_CPPCOREGUIDELINES_AVOIDBOUNDSERRORSCHECK_H
+#define LLVM_CLANG_TOOLS_EXTRA_CLANG_TIDY_CPPCOREGUIDELINES_AVOIDBOUNDSERRORSCHECK_H
+
+#include "../ClangTidyCheck.h"
+
+namespace clang::tidy::cppcoreguidelines {
+
+/// Enforce CPP core guidelines SL.con.3
+///
+/// See
+/// https://isocpp.github.io/CppCoreGuidelines/CppCoreGuidelines#slcon3-avoid-bounds-errors
+/// For the user-facing documentation see:
+/// http://clang.llvm.org/extra/clang-tidy/checks/cppcoreguidelines/avoid-bounds-errors.html
+class AvoidBoundsErrorsCheck : public ClangTidyCheck {
+public:
+ AvoidBoundsErrorsCheck(StringRef Name, ClangTidyContext *Context)
+ : ClangTidyCheck(Name, Context) {}
+ void registerMatchers(ast_matchers::MatchFinder *Finder) override;
+ void check(const ast_matchers::MatchFinder::MatchResult &Result) override;
+};
+
+} // namespace clang::tidy::cppcoreguidelines
+
+#endif // LLVM_CLANG_TOOLS_EXTRA_CLANG_TIDY_CPPCOREGUIDELINES_AVOIDBOUNDSERRORSCHECK_H
diff --git a/clang-tools-extra/clang-tidy/cppcoreguidelines/CMakeLists.txt b/clang-tools-extra/clang-tidy/cppcoreguidelines/CMakeLists.txt
index eb35bbc6a538fe..4972d20417928d 100644
--- a/clang-tools-extra/clang-tidy/cppcoreguidelines/CMakeLists.txt
+++ b/clang-tools-extra/clang-tidy/cppcoreguidelines/CMakeLists.txt
@@ -4,6 +4,7 @@ set(LLVM_LINK_COMPONENTS
)
add_clang_library(clangTidyCppCoreGuidelinesModule
+ AvoidBoundsErrorsCheck.cpp
AvoidCapturingLambdaCoroutinesCheck.cpp
AvoidConstOrRefDataMembersCheck.cpp
AvoidDoWhileCheck.cpp
diff --git a/clang-tools-extra/clang-tidy/cppcoreguidelines/CppCoreGuidelinesTidyModule.cpp b/clang-tools-extra/clang-tidy/cppcoreguidelines/CppCoreGuidelinesTidyModule.cpp
index e9f0201615616f..525bbc7a42adaa 100644
--- a/clang-tools-extra/clang-tidy/cppcoreguidelines/CppCoreGuidelinesTidyModule.cpp
+++ b/clang-tools-extra/clang-tidy/cppcoreguidelines/CppCoreGuidelinesTidyModule.cpp
@@ -19,6 +19,7 @@
#include "../performance/NoexceptMoveConstructorCheck.h"
#include "../performance/NoexceptSwapCheck.h"
#include "../readability/MagicNumbersCheck.h"
+#include "AvoidBoundsErrorsCheck.h"
#include "AvoidCapturingLambdaCoroutinesCheck.h"
#include "AvoidConstOrRefDataMembersCheck.h"
#include "AvoidDoWhileCheck.h"
@@ -57,6 +58,8 @@ namespace cppcoreguidelines {
class CppCoreGuidelinesModule : public ClangTidyModule {
public:
void addCheckFactories(ClangTidyCheckFactories &CheckFactories) override {
+ CheckFactories.registerCheck<AvoidBoundsErrorsCheck>(
+ "cppcoreguidelines-avoid-bounds-errors");
CheckFactories.registerCheck<AvoidCapturingLambdaCoroutinesCheck>(
"cppcoreguidelines-avoid-capturing-lambda-coroutines");
CheckFactories.registerCheck<modernize::AvoidCArraysCheck>(
diff --git a/clang-tools-extra/docs/ReleaseNotes.rst b/clang-tools-extra/docs/ReleaseNotes.rst
index 1ad8cedc902cb5..4782ca0088c42a 100644
--- a/clang-tools-extra/docs/ReleaseNotes.rst
+++ b/clang-tools-extra/docs/ReleaseNotes.rst
@@ -101,6 +101,11 @@ Improvements to clang-tidy
New checks
^^^^^^^^^^
+- New :doc:`cppcoreguidelines-avoid-bounds-errors
+ <clang-tidy/checks/cppcoreguidelines/avoid-bounds-errors>` check.
+
+ Flags the unsafe `operator[]` and replaces it with `at()`.
+
New check aliases
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
diff --git a/clang-tools-extra/docs/clang-tidy/checks/cppcoreguidelines/avoid-bounds-errors.rst b/clang-tools-extra/docs/clang-tidy/checks/cppcoreguidelines/avoid-bounds-errors.rst
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000000..8fb2e3bfde0981
--- /dev/null
+++ b/clang-tools-extra/docs/clang-tidy/checks/cppcoreguidelines/avoid-bounds-errors.rst
@@ -0,0 +1,20 @@
+.. title:: clang-tidy - cppcoreguidelines-avoid-bounds-errors
+
+cppcoreguidelines-avoid-bounds-errors
+=====================================
+
+This check enforces the `SL.con.3 <https://isocpp.github.io/CppCoreGuidelines/CppCoreGuidelines#slcon3-avoid-bounds-errors>` guideline.
+It flags all uses of `operator[]` on `std::vector`, `std::array`, `std::deque`, `std::map`, `std::unordered_map`, and `std::flat_map` and suggests to replace it with `at()`.
+Note that `std::span` and `std::mdspan` do not support `at()` as of C++23, so the use of `operator[]` is not flagged.
+
+For example the code
+
+.. code-block:: c++
+ std::array<int, 3> a;
+ int b = a[4];
+
+will be replaced by
+
+.. code-block:: c++
+ std::vector<int, 3> a;
+ int b = a.at(4);
diff --git a/clang-tools-extra/docs/clang-tidy/checks/list.rst b/clang-tools-extra/docs/clang-tidy/checks/list.rst
index a931ebf025a10e..6262a950f75503 100644
--- a/clang-tools-extra/docs/clang-tidy/checks/list.rst
+++ b/clang-tools-extra/docs/clang-tidy/checks/list.rst
@@ -176,6 +176,7 @@ Clang-Tidy Checks
:doc:`cert-oop58-cpp <cert/oop58-cpp>`,
:doc:`concurrency-mt-unsafe <concurrency/mt-unsafe>`,
:doc:`concurrency-thread-canceltype-asynchronous <concurrency/thread-canceltype-asynchronous>`,
+ :doc:`cppcoreguidelines-avoid-bounds-errors <cppcoreguidelines/avoid-bounds-errors>`, "Yes"
:doc:`cppcoreguidelines-avoid-capturing-lambda-coroutines <cppcoreguidelines/avoid-capturing-lambda-coroutines>`,
:doc:`cppcoreguidelines-avoid-const-or-ref-data-members <cppcoreguidelines/avoid-const-or-ref-data-members>`,
:doc:`cppcoreguidelines-avoid-do-while <cppcoreguidelines/avoid-do-while>`,
diff --git a/clang-tools-extra/test/clang-tidy/checkers/cppcoreguidelines/avoid-bounds-errors.cpp b/clang-tools-extra/test/clang-tidy/checkers/cppcoreguidelines/avoid-bounds-errors.cpp
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000000..23453b1f2df218
--- /dev/null
+++ b/clang-tools-extra/test/clang-tidy/checkers/cppcoreguidelines/avoid-bounds-errors.cpp
@@ -0,0 +1,66 @@
+namespace std {
+ template<typename T, unsigned size>
+ struct array {
+ T operator[](unsigned i) {
+ return T{1};
+ }
+ T at(unsigned i) {
+ return T{1};
+ }
+ };
+
+ template<typename T>
+ struct unique_ptr {
+ T operator[](unsigned i) {
+ return T{1};
+ }
+ };
+
+ template<typename T>
+ struct span {
+ T operator[](unsigned i) {
+ return T{1};
+ }
+ };
+} // namespace std
+
+namespace json {
+ template<typename T>
+ struct node{
+ T operator[](unsigned i) {
+ return T{1};
+ }
+ };
+} // namespace json
+
+
+// RUN: %check_clang_tidy %s cppcoreguidelines-avoid-bounds-errors %t
+std::array<int, 3> a;
+
+auto b = a[0];
+// CHECK-MESSAGES: :[[@LINE-1]]:10: warning: Do not use operator[], use at() instead. [cppcoreguidelines-avoid-bounds-errors]
+// CHECK-FIXES: auto b = a.at(0);
+auto c = a[1+1];
+// CHECK-MESSAGES: :[[@LINE-1]]:10: warning: Do not use operator[], use at() instead. [cppcoreguidelines-avoid-bounds-errors]
+// CHECK-FIXES: auto c = a.at(1+1);
+constexpr int index = 1;
+auto d = a[index];
+// CHECK-MESSAGES: :[[@LINE-1]]:10: warning: Do not use operator[], use at() instead. [cppcoreguidelines-avoid-bounds-errors]
+// CHECK-FIXES: auto d = a.at(index);
+
+int e(int index) {
+ return a[index];
+// CHECK-MESSAGES: :[[@LINE-1]]:10: warning: Do not use operator[], use at() instead. [cppcoreguidelines-avoid-bounds-errors]
+// CHECK-FIXES: return a.at(index);
+}
+
+auto f = a.at(0);
+
+std::unique_ptr<int> p;
+auto q = p[0];
+
+std::span<int> s;
+auto t = s[0];
+
+json::node<int> n;
+auto m = n[0];
>From fd9714fd33e681a3f9d0d542e6bc7e192c8caabc Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Sebastian Wolf <wolf.sebastian at in.tum.de>
Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2024 09:06:02 +0200
Subject: [PATCH 02/48] EugeneZelenko's comments
---
.../cppcoreguidelines/AvoidBoundsErrorsCheck.cpp | 10 +++++-----
.../cppcoreguidelines/AvoidBoundsErrorsCheck.h | 3 +++
clang-tools-extra/docs/ReleaseNotes.rst | 2 +-
.../checks/cppcoreguidelines/avoid-bounds-errors.rst | 7 ++++---
4 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/clang-tools-extra/clang-tidy/cppcoreguidelines/AvoidBoundsErrorsCheck.cpp b/clang-tools-extra/clang-tidy/cppcoreguidelines/AvoidBoundsErrorsCheck.cpp
index 524c21b5bdb818..2c0a12e21d726b 100644
--- a/clang-tools-extra/clang-tidy/cppcoreguidelines/AvoidBoundsErrorsCheck.cpp
+++ b/clang-tools-extra/clang-tidy/cppcoreguidelines/AvoidBoundsErrorsCheck.cpp
@@ -9,13 +9,13 @@
#include "AvoidBoundsErrorsCheck.h"
#include "clang/ASTMatchers/ASTMatchFinder.h"
#include "clang/Lex/Lexer.h"
-
#include <iostream>
+
using namespace clang::ast_matchers;
namespace clang::tidy::cppcoreguidelines {
-bool isApplicable(const QualType &Type) {
+static bool isApplicable(const QualType &Type) {
const auto TypeStr = Type.getAsString();
bool Result = false;
// Only check for containers in the std namespace
@@ -51,9 +51,9 @@ void AvoidBoundsErrorsCheck::registerMatchers(MatchFinder *Finder) {
void AvoidBoundsErrorsCheck::check(const MatchFinder::MatchResult &Result) {
const ASTContext &Context = *Result.Context;
const SourceManager &Source = Context.getSourceManager();
- const auto *MatchedExpr = Result.Nodes.getNodeAs<CallExpr>("x");
- const auto *MatchedFunction = Result.Nodes.getNodeAs<CXXMethodDecl>("f");
- const auto Type = MatchedFunction->getThisType();
+ const CallExpr *MatchedExpr = Result.Nodes.getNodeAs<CallExpr>("x");
+ const CXXMethodDecl *MatchedFunction = Result.Nodes.getNodeAs<CXXMethodDecl>("f");
+ const QualType Type = MatchedFunction->getThisType();
if (!isApplicable(Type)) {
return;
}
diff --git a/clang-tools-extra/clang-tidy/cppcoreguidelines/AvoidBoundsErrorsCheck.h b/clang-tools-extra/clang-tidy/cppcoreguidelines/AvoidBoundsErrorsCheck.h
index f915729cd7bbee..12c78528771234 100644
--- a/clang-tools-extra/clang-tidy/cppcoreguidelines/AvoidBoundsErrorsCheck.h
+++ b/clang-tools-extra/clang-tidy/cppcoreguidelines/AvoidBoundsErrorsCheck.h
@@ -23,6 +23,9 @@ class AvoidBoundsErrorsCheck : public ClangTidyCheck {
public:
AvoidBoundsErrorsCheck(StringRef Name, ClangTidyContext *Context)
: ClangTidyCheck(Name, Context) {}
+ bool isLanguageVersionSupported(const LangOptions &LangOpts) const override {
+ return LangOpts.CPlusPlus;
+ }
void registerMatchers(ast_matchers::MatchFinder *Finder) override;
void check(const ast_matchers::MatchFinder::MatchResult &Result) override;
};
diff --git a/clang-tools-extra/docs/ReleaseNotes.rst b/clang-tools-extra/docs/ReleaseNotes.rst
index 4782ca0088c42a..59df341b693902 100644
--- a/clang-tools-extra/docs/ReleaseNotes.rst
+++ b/clang-tools-extra/docs/ReleaseNotes.rst
@@ -104,7 +104,7 @@ New checks
- New :doc:`cppcoreguidelines-avoid-bounds-errors
<clang-tidy/checks/cppcoreguidelines/avoid-bounds-errors>` check.
- Flags the unsafe `operator[]` and replaces it with `at()`.
+ Flags the unsafe ``operator[]`` and replaces it with ``at()``.
New check aliases
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
diff --git a/clang-tools-extra/docs/clang-tidy/checks/cppcoreguidelines/avoid-bounds-errors.rst b/clang-tools-extra/docs/clang-tidy/checks/cppcoreguidelines/avoid-bounds-errors.rst
index 8fb2e3bfde0981..13683ee9b5a467 100644
--- a/clang-tools-extra/docs/clang-tidy/checks/cppcoreguidelines/avoid-bounds-errors.rst
+++ b/clang-tools-extra/docs/clang-tidy/checks/cppcoreguidelines/avoid-bounds-errors.rst
@@ -3,9 +3,8 @@
cppcoreguidelines-avoid-bounds-errors
=====================================
-This check enforces the `SL.con.3 <https://isocpp.github.io/CppCoreGuidelines/CppCoreGuidelines#slcon3-avoid-bounds-errors>` guideline.
-It flags all uses of `operator[]` on `std::vector`, `std::array`, `std::deque`, `std::map`, `std::unordered_map`, and `std::flat_map` and suggests to replace it with `at()`.
-Note that `std::span` and `std::mdspan` do not support `at()` as of C++23, so the use of `operator[]` is not flagged.
+This check flags all uses of ``operator[]`` on ``std::vector``, ``std::array``, ``std::deque``, ``std::map``, ``std::unordered_map``, and ``std::flat_map`` and suggests to replace it with ``at()``.
+Note that ``std::span`` and ``std::mdspan`` do not support ``at()`` as of C++23, so the use of ``operator[]`` is not flagged.
For example the code
@@ -18,3 +17,5 @@ will be replaced by
.. code-block:: c++
std::vector<int, 3> a;
int b = a.at(4);
+
+This check enforces the `SL.con.3 <https://isocpp.github.io/CppCoreGuidelines/CppCoreGuidelines#slcon3-avoid-bounds-errors>` guideline.
>From 87018088d0df98d27185b677705f17931d52cb4c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Sebastian Wolf <wolf.sebastian at in.tum.de>
Date: Fri, 24 May 2024 12:09:11 +0200
Subject: [PATCH 03/48] Refactoring, but not finished yet
---
.../AvoidBoundsErrorsCheck.cpp | 97 ++++++++++---------
.../cppcoreguidelines/avoid-bounds-errors.cpp | 17 ++--
2 files changed, 57 insertions(+), 57 deletions(-)
diff --git a/clang-tools-extra/clang-tidy/cppcoreguidelines/AvoidBoundsErrorsCheck.cpp b/clang-tools-extra/clang-tidy/cppcoreguidelines/AvoidBoundsErrorsCheck.cpp
index 2c0a12e21d726b..f10b97820f4c7d 100644
--- a/clang-tools-extra/clang-tidy/cppcoreguidelines/AvoidBoundsErrorsCheck.cpp
+++ b/clang-tools-extra/clang-tidy/cppcoreguidelines/AvoidBoundsErrorsCheck.cpp
@@ -9,73 +9,74 @@
#include "AvoidBoundsErrorsCheck.h"
#include "clang/ASTMatchers/ASTMatchFinder.h"
#include "clang/Lex/Lexer.h"
-#include <iostream>
using namespace clang::ast_matchers;
namespace clang::tidy::cppcoreguidelines {
-static bool isApplicable(const QualType &Type) {
- const auto TypeStr = Type.getAsString();
- bool Result = false;
- // Only check for containers in the std namespace
- if (TypeStr.find("std::vector") != std::string::npos) {
- Result = true;
- }
- if (TypeStr.find("std::array") != std::string::npos) {
- Result = true;
- }
- if (TypeStr.find("std::deque") != std::string::npos) {
- Result = true;
- }
- if (TypeStr.find("std::map") != std::string::npos) {
- Result = true;
- }
- if (TypeStr.find("std::unordered_map") != std::string::npos) {
- Result = true;
- }
- if (TypeStr.find("std::flat_map") != std::string::npos) {
- Result = true;
+const CXXMethodDecl *findAlternative(const CXXRecordDecl *MatchedParent,
+ const CXXMethodDecl *MatchedOperator) {
+ for (const CXXMethodDecl *Method : MatchedParent->methods()) {
+ const bool CorrectName = Method->getNameInfo().getAsString() == "at";
+ if (!CorrectName)
+ continue;
+
+ const bool SameReturnType =
+ Method->getReturnType() == MatchedOperator->getReturnType();
+ if (!SameReturnType)
+ continue;
+
+ const bool SameNumberOfArguments =
+ Method->getNumParams() == MatchedOperator->getNumParams();
+ if (!SameNumberOfArguments)
+ continue;
+
+ for (unsigned a = 0; a < Method->getNumParams(); a++) {
+ const bool SameArgType =
+ Method->parameters()[a]->getOriginalType() ==
+ MatchedOperator->parameters()[a]->getOriginalType();
+ if (!SameArgType)
+ continue;
+ }
+
+ return Method;
}
- // TODO Add std::span with C++26
- return Result;
+ return static_cast<CXXMethodDecl *>(nullptr);
}
void AvoidBoundsErrorsCheck::registerMatchers(MatchFinder *Finder) {
+ // Need a callExpr here to match CXXOperatorCallExpr ``(&a)->operator[](0)``
+ // and CXXMemberCallExpr ``a[0]``.
Finder->addMatcher(
- callExpr(callee(cxxMethodDecl(hasName("operator[]")).bind("f")))
- .bind("x"),
+ callExpr(
+ callee(
+ cxxMethodDecl(hasOverloadedOperatorName("[]")).bind("operator")),
+ callee(cxxMethodDecl(hasParent(
+ cxxRecordDecl(hasMethod(hasName("at"))).bind("parent")))))
+ .bind("caller"),
this);
}
void AvoidBoundsErrorsCheck::check(const MatchFinder::MatchResult &Result) {
const ASTContext &Context = *Result.Context;
const SourceManager &Source = Context.getSourceManager();
- const CallExpr *MatchedExpr = Result.Nodes.getNodeAs<CallExpr>("x");
- const CXXMethodDecl *MatchedFunction = Result.Nodes.getNodeAs<CXXMethodDecl>("f");
- const QualType Type = MatchedFunction->getThisType();
- if (!isApplicable(Type)) {
- return;
- }
+ const CallExpr *MatchedExpr = Result.Nodes.getNodeAs<CallExpr>("caller");
+ const CXXMethodDecl *MatchedOperator =
+ Result.Nodes.getNodeAs<CXXMethodDecl>("operator");
+ const CXXRecordDecl *MatchedParent =
+ Result.Nodes.getNodeAs<CXXRecordDecl>("parent");
- // Get original code.
- const SourceLocation b(MatchedExpr->getBeginLoc());
- const SourceLocation e(MatchedExpr->getEndLoc());
- const std::string OriginalCode =
- Lexer::getSourceText(CharSourceRange::getTokenRange(b, e), Source,
- getLangOpts())
- .str();
- const auto Range = SourceRange(b, e);
+ const CXXMethodDecl *Alternative =
+ findAlternative(MatchedParent, MatchedOperator);
+ if (!Alternative)
+ return;
- // Build replacement.
- std::string NewCode = OriginalCode;
- const auto BeginOpen = NewCode.find("[");
- NewCode.replace(BeginOpen, 1, ".at(");
- const auto BeginClose = NewCode.find("]");
- NewCode.replace(BeginClose, 1, ")");
+ const SourceLocation AlternativeSource(Alternative->getBeginLoc());
- diag(MatchedExpr->getBeginLoc(), "Do not use operator[], use at() instead.")
- << FixItHint::CreateReplacement(Range, NewCode);
+ diag(MatchedExpr->getBeginLoc(),
+ "found possibly unsafe operator[], consider using at() instead");
+ diag(Alternative->getBeginLoc(), "alternative at() defined here",
+ DiagnosticIDs::Note);
}
} // namespace clang::tidy::cppcoreguidelines
diff --git a/clang-tools-extra/test/clang-tidy/checkers/cppcoreguidelines/avoid-bounds-errors.cpp b/clang-tools-extra/test/clang-tidy/checkers/cppcoreguidelines/avoid-bounds-errors.cpp
index 23453b1f2df218..5e12e7d71790d0 100644
--- a/clang-tools-extra/test/clang-tidy/checkers/cppcoreguidelines/avoid-bounds-errors.cpp
+++ b/clang-tools-extra/test/clang-tidy/checkers/cppcoreguidelines/avoid-bounds-errors.cpp
@@ -38,23 +38,22 @@ namespace json {
std::array<int, 3> a;
auto b = a[0];
-// CHECK-MESSAGES: :[[@LINE-1]]:10: warning: Do not use operator[], use at() instead. [cppcoreguidelines-avoid-bounds-errors]
-// CHECK-FIXES: auto b = a.at(0);
+// CHECK-MESSAGES: :[[@LINE-1]]:10: warning: found possibly unsafe operator[], consider using at() instead [cppcoreguidelines-avoid-bounds-errors]
auto c = a[1+1];
-// CHECK-MESSAGES: :[[@LINE-1]]:10: warning: Do not use operator[], use at() instead. [cppcoreguidelines-avoid-bounds-errors]
-// CHECK-FIXES: auto c = a.at(1+1);
+// CHECK-MESSAGES: :[[@LINE-1]]:10: warning: found possibly unsafe operator[], consider using at() instead [cppcoreguidelines-avoid-bounds-errors]
constexpr int index = 1;
auto d = a[index];
-// CHECK-MESSAGES: :[[@LINE-1]]:10: warning: Do not use operator[], use at() instead. [cppcoreguidelines-avoid-bounds-errors]
-// CHECK-FIXES: auto d = a.at(index);
+// CHECK-MESSAGES: :[[@LINE-1]]:10: warning: found possibly unsafe operator[], consider using at() instead [cppcoreguidelines-avoid-bounds-errors]
int e(int index) {
return a[index];
-// CHECK-MESSAGES: :[[@LINE-1]]:10: warning: Do not use operator[], use at() instead. [cppcoreguidelines-avoid-bounds-errors]
-// CHECK-FIXES: return a.at(index);
+// CHECK-MESSAGES: :[[@LINE-1]]:10: warning: found possibly unsafe operator[], consider using at() instead [cppcoreguidelines-avoid-bounds-errors]
}
-auto f = a.at(0);
+auto f = (&a)->operator[](1);
+// CHECK-MESSAGES: :[[@LINE-1]]:10: warning: found possibly unsafe operator[], consider using at() instead [cppcoreguidelines-avoid-bounds-errors]
+
+auto g = a.at(0);
std::unique_ptr<int> p;
auto q = p[0];
>From 04dc953d634b92f9d5d9eb09db2b96069b48ae1d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Paul=20Heidekr=C3=BCger?= <paul.heidekrueger at tum.de>
Date: Mon, 10 Jun 2024 20:56:39 +0200
Subject: [PATCH 04/48] Rename AvoidBoundsErrorsCheck to
PreferAtOverSubscriptOperatorCheck
Co-authored-by: Manuel Pietsch <manuelpietsch at outlook.de>
---
.../cppcoreguidelines/CMakeLists.txt | 2 +-
.../CppCoreGuidelinesTidyModule.cpp | 6 +--
...=> PreferAtOverSubscriptOperatorCheck.cpp} | 9 +++--
...h => PreferAtOverSubscriptOperatorCheck.h} | 16 ++++----
clang-tools-extra/docs/ReleaseNotes.rst | 38 +++++++++++++++++--
... => prefer-at-over-subscript-operator.rst} | 4 +-
.../docs/clang-tidy/checks/list.rst | 2 +-
... => prefer-at-over-subscript-operator.cpp} | 12 +++---
8 files changed, 61 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)
rename clang-tools-extra/clang-tidy/cppcoreguidelines/{AvoidBoundsErrorsCheck.cpp => PreferAtOverSubscriptOperatorCheck.cpp} (90%)
rename clang-tools-extra/clang-tidy/cppcoreguidelines/{AvoidBoundsErrorsCheck.h => PreferAtOverSubscriptOperatorCheck.h} (60%)
rename clang-tools-extra/docs/clang-tidy/checks/cppcoreguidelines/{avoid-bounds-errors.rst => prefer-at-over-subscript-operator.rst} (83%)
rename clang-tools-extra/test/clang-tidy/checkers/cppcoreguidelines/{avoid-bounds-errors.cpp => prefer-at-over-subscript-operator.cpp} (67%)
diff --git a/clang-tools-extra/clang-tidy/cppcoreguidelines/CMakeLists.txt b/clang-tools-extra/clang-tidy/cppcoreguidelines/CMakeLists.txt
index 4972d20417928d..fd436859ad04a3 100644
--- a/clang-tools-extra/clang-tidy/cppcoreguidelines/CMakeLists.txt
+++ b/clang-tools-extra/clang-tidy/cppcoreguidelines/CMakeLists.txt
@@ -4,7 +4,6 @@ set(LLVM_LINK_COMPONENTS
)
add_clang_library(clangTidyCppCoreGuidelinesModule
- AvoidBoundsErrorsCheck.cpp
AvoidCapturingLambdaCoroutinesCheck.cpp
AvoidConstOrRefDataMembersCheck.cpp
AvoidDoWhileCheck.cpp
@@ -21,6 +20,7 @@ add_clang_library(clangTidyCppCoreGuidelinesModule
NoMallocCheck.cpp
NoSuspendWithLockCheck.cpp
OwningMemoryCheck.cpp
+ PreferAtOverSubscriptOperatorCheck.cpp
PreferMemberInitializerCheck.cpp
ProBoundsArrayToPointerDecayCheck.cpp
ProBoundsConstantArrayIndexCheck.cpp
diff --git a/clang-tools-extra/clang-tidy/cppcoreguidelines/CppCoreGuidelinesTidyModule.cpp b/clang-tools-extra/clang-tidy/cppcoreguidelines/CppCoreGuidelinesTidyModule.cpp
index 525bbc7a42adaa..565a99a865519c 100644
--- a/clang-tools-extra/clang-tidy/cppcoreguidelines/CppCoreGuidelinesTidyModule.cpp
+++ b/clang-tools-extra/clang-tidy/cppcoreguidelines/CppCoreGuidelinesTidyModule.cpp
@@ -19,7 +19,6 @@
#include "../performance/NoexceptMoveConstructorCheck.h"
#include "../performance/NoexceptSwapCheck.h"
#include "../readability/MagicNumbersCheck.h"
-#include "AvoidBoundsErrorsCheck.h"
#include "AvoidCapturingLambdaCoroutinesCheck.h"
#include "AvoidConstOrRefDataMembersCheck.h"
#include "AvoidDoWhileCheck.h"
@@ -35,6 +34,7 @@
#include "NoMallocCheck.h"
#include "NoSuspendWithLockCheck.h"
#include "OwningMemoryCheck.h"
+#include "PreferAtOverSubscriptOperatorCheck.h"
#include "PreferMemberInitializerCheck.h"
#include "ProBoundsArrayToPointerDecayCheck.h"
#include "ProBoundsConstantArrayIndexCheck.h"
@@ -58,8 +58,6 @@ namespace cppcoreguidelines {
class CppCoreGuidelinesModule : public ClangTidyModule {
public:
void addCheckFactories(ClangTidyCheckFactories &CheckFactories) override {
- CheckFactories.registerCheck<AvoidBoundsErrorsCheck>(
- "cppcoreguidelines-avoid-bounds-errors");
CheckFactories.registerCheck<AvoidCapturingLambdaCoroutinesCheck>(
"cppcoreguidelines-avoid-capturing-lambda-coroutines");
CheckFactories.registerCheck<modernize::AvoidCArraysCheck>(
@@ -105,6 +103,8 @@ class CppCoreGuidelinesModule : public ClangTidyModule {
"cppcoreguidelines-non-private-member-variables-in-classes");
CheckFactories.registerCheck<OwningMemoryCheck>(
"cppcoreguidelines-owning-memory");
+ CheckFactories.registerCheck<PreferAtOverSubscriptOperatorCheck>(
+ "cppcoreguidelines-prefer-at-over-subscript-operator");
CheckFactories.registerCheck<PreferMemberInitializerCheck>(
"cppcoreguidelines-prefer-member-initializer");
CheckFactories.registerCheck<ProBoundsArrayToPointerDecayCheck>(
diff --git a/clang-tools-extra/clang-tidy/cppcoreguidelines/AvoidBoundsErrorsCheck.cpp b/clang-tools-extra/clang-tidy/cppcoreguidelines/PreferAtOverSubscriptOperatorCheck.cpp
similarity index 90%
rename from clang-tools-extra/clang-tidy/cppcoreguidelines/AvoidBoundsErrorsCheck.cpp
rename to clang-tools-extra/clang-tidy/cppcoreguidelines/PreferAtOverSubscriptOperatorCheck.cpp
index f10b97820f4c7d..64eaf8a1d4ebd5 100644
--- a/clang-tools-extra/clang-tidy/cppcoreguidelines/AvoidBoundsErrorsCheck.cpp
+++ b/clang-tools-extra/clang-tidy/cppcoreguidelines/PreferAtOverSubscriptOperatorCheck.cpp
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-//===--- AvoidBoundsErrorsCheck.cpp - clang-tidy --------------------------===//
+//===--- PreferAtOverSubscriptOperatorCheck.cpp - clang-tidy --------------===//
//
// Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM Exceptions.
// See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information.
@@ -6,7 +6,7 @@
//
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
-#include "AvoidBoundsErrorsCheck.h"
+#include "PreferAtOverSubscriptOperatorCheck.h"
#include "clang/ASTMatchers/ASTMatchFinder.h"
#include "clang/Lex/Lexer.h"
@@ -44,7 +44,7 @@ const CXXMethodDecl *findAlternative(const CXXRecordDecl *MatchedParent,
return static_cast<CXXMethodDecl *>(nullptr);
}
-void AvoidBoundsErrorsCheck::registerMatchers(MatchFinder *Finder) {
+void PreferAtOverSubscriptOperatorCheck::registerMatchers(MatchFinder *Finder) {
// Need a callExpr here to match CXXOperatorCallExpr ``(&a)->operator[](0)``
// and CXXMemberCallExpr ``a[0]``.
Finder->addMatcher(
@@ -57,7 +57,8 @@ void AvoidBoundsErrorsCheck::registerMatchers(MatchFinder *Finder) {
this);
}
-void AvoidBoundsErrorsCheck::check(const MatchFinder::MatchResult &Result) {
+void PreferAtOverSubscriptOperatorCheck::check(
+ const MatchFinder::MatchResult &Result) {
const ASTContext &Context = *Result.Context;
const SourceManager &Source = Context.getSourceManager();
const CallExpr *MatchedExpr = Result.Nodes.getNodeAs<CallExpr>("caller");
diff --git a/clang-tools-extra/clang-tidy/cppcoreguidelines/AvoidBoundsErrorsCheck.h b/clang-tools-extra/clang-tidy/cppcoreguidelines/PreferAtOverSubscriptOperatorCheck.h
similarity index 60%
rename from clang-tools-extra/clang-tidy/cppcoreguidelines/AvoidBoundsErrorsCheck.h
rename to clang-tools-extra/clang-tidy/cppcoreguidelines/PreferAtOverSubscriptOperatorCheck.h
index 12c78528771234..eb6e3a021e1b6c 100644
--- a/clang-tools-extra/clang-tidy/cppcoreguidelines/AvoidBoundsErrorsCheck.h
+++ b/clang-tools-extra/clang-tidy/cppcoreguidelines/PreferAtOverSubscriptOperatorCheck.h
@@ -1,4 +1,5 @@
-//===--- AvoidBoundsErrorsCheck.h - clang-tidy ------------------*- C++ -*-===//
+//===--- PreferAtOverSubscriptOperatorCheck.h - clang-tidy ------*- C++ -*-===//
+//===--- PreferMemberInitializerCheck.h - clang-tidy ------------*- C++ -*-===//
//
// Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM Exceptions.
// See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information.
@@ -6,8 +7,8 @@
//
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
-#ifndef LLVM_CLANG_TOOLS_EXTRA_CLANG_TIDY_CPPCOREGUIDELINES_AVOIDBOUNDSERRORSCHECK_H
-#define LLVM_CLANG_TOOLS_EXTRA_CLANG_TIDY_CPPCOREGUIDELINES_AVOIDBOUNDSERRORSCHECK_H
+#ifndef LLVM_CLANG_TOOLS_EXTRA_CLANG_TIDY_CPPCOREGUIDELINES_PREFERATOVERSUBSCRIPTOPERATORCHECK_H
+#define LLVM_CLANG_TOOLS_EXTRA_CLANG_TIDY_CPPCOREGUIDELINES_PREFERATOVERSUBSCRIPTOPERATORCHECK_H
#include "../ClangTidyCheck.h"
@@ -18,11 +19,10 @@ namespace clang::tidy::cppcoreguidelines {
/// See
/// https://isocpp.github.io/CppCoreGuidelines/CppCoreGuidelines#slcon3-avoid-bounds-errors
/// For the user-facing documentation see:
-/// http://clang.llvm.org/extra/clang-tidy/checks/cppcoreguidelines/avoid-bounds-errors.html
-class AvoidBoundsErrorsCheck : public ClangTidyCheck {
+/// http://clang.llvm.org/extra/clang-tidy/checks/cppcoreguidelines/prefer-at-over-subscript-operator.html
+class PreferAtOverSubscriptOperatorCheck : public ClangTidyCheck {
public:
- AvoidBoundsErrorsCheck(StringRef Name, ClangTidyContext *Context)
- : ClangTidyCheck(Name, Context) {}
+ PreferAtOverSubscriptOperatorCheck(StringRef Name, ClangTidyContext *Context);
bool isLanguageVersionSupported(const LangOptions &LangOpts) const override {
return LangOpts.CPlusPlus;
}
@@ -32,4 +32,4 @@ class AvoidBoundsErrorsCheck : public ClangTidyCheck {
} // namespace clang::tidy::cppcoreguidelines
-#endif // LLVM_CLANG_TOOLS_EXTRA_CLANG_TIDY_CPPCOREGUIDELINES_AVOIDBOUNDSERRORSCHECK_H
+#endif // LLVM_CLANG_TOOLS_EXTRA_CLANG_TIDY_CPPCOREGUIDELINES_PREFERATOVERSUBSCRIPTOPERATORCHECK_H
diff --git a/clang-tools-extra/docs/ReleaseNotes.rst b/clang-tools-extra/docs/ReleaseNotes.rst
index 59df341b693902..61e30057d8dc73 100644
--- a/clang-tools-extra/docs/ReleaseNotes.rst
+++ b/clang-tools-extra/docs/ReleaseNotes.rst
@@ -101,10 +101,42 @@ Improvements to clang-tidy
New checks
^^^^^^^^^^
-- New :doc:`cppcoreguidelines-avoid-bounds-errors
- <clang-tidy/checks/cppcoreguidelines/avoid-bounds-errors>` check.
+- New :doc:`bugprone-crtp-constructor-accessibility
+ <clang-tidy/checks/bugprone/crtp-constructor-accessibility>` check.
- Flags the unsafe ``operator[]`` and replaces it with ``at()``.
+ Detects error-prone Curiously Recurring Template Pattern usage, when the CRTP
+ can be constructed outside itself and the derived class.
+
+- New :doc:`bugprone-return-const-ref-from-parameter
+ <clang-tidy/checks/bugprone/return-const-ref-from-parameter>` check.
+
+ Detects return statements that return a constant reference parameter as constant
+ reference. This may cause use-after-free errors if the caller uses xvalues as
+ arguments.
+
+- New :doc:`bugprone-suspicious-stringview-data-usage
+ <clang-tidy/checks/bugprone/suspicious-stringview-data-usage>` check.
+
+ Identifies suspicious usages of ``std::string_view::data()`` that could lead
+ to reading out-of-bounds data due to inadequate or incorrect string null
+ termination.
+
+- New :doc:`misc-use-internal-linkage
+ <clang-tidy/checks/misc/use-internal-linkage>` check.
+
+ Detects variables and functions that can be marked as static or moved into
+ an anonymous namespace to enforce internal linkage.
+
+- New :doc:`modernize-min-max-use-initializer-list
+ <clang-tidy/checks/modernize/min-max-use-initializer-list>` check.
+
+ Replaces nested ``std::min`` and ``std::max`` calls with an initializer list
+ where applicable.
+
+- New :doc:`cppcoreguidelines-prefer-at-over-subscript-operator
+ <clang-tidy/checks/cppcoreguidelines/prefer-at-over-subscript-operator>` check.
+
+ Flags the unsafe ``operator[]`` and suggests replacing it with ``at()``.
New check aliases
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
diff --git a/clang-tools-extra/docs/clang-tidy/checks/cppcoreguidelines/avoid-bounds-errors.rst b/clang-tools-extra/docs/clang-tidy/checks/cppcoreguidelines/prefer-at-over-subscript-operator.rst
similarity index 83%
rename from clang-tools-extra/docs/clang-tidy/checks/cppcoreguidelines/avoid-bounds-errors.rst
rename to clang-tools-extra/docs/clang-tidy/checks/cppcoreguidelines/prefer-at-over-subscript-operator.rst
index 13683ee9b5a467..183175b5966682 100644
--- a/clang-tools-extra/docs/clang-tidy/checks/cppcoreguidelines/avoid-bounds-errors.rst
+++ b/clang-tools-extra/docs/clang-tidy/checks/cppcoreguidelines/prefer-at-over-subscript-operator.rst
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
-.. title:: clang-tidy - cppcoreguidelines-avoid-bounds-errors
+.. title:: clang-tidy - cppcoreguidelines-prefer-at-over-subscript-operator
-cppcoreguidelines-avoid-bounds-errors
+cppcoreguidelines-prefer-at-over-subscript-operator
=====================================
This check flags all uses of ``operator[]`` on ``std::vector``, ``std::array``, ``std::deque``, ``std::map``, ``std::unordered_map``, and ``std::flat_map`` and suggests to replace it with ``at()``.
diff --git a/clang-tools-extra/docs/clang-tidy/checks/list.rst b/clang-tools-extra/docs/clang-tidy/checks/list.rst
index 6262a950f75503..51aa36bb8d09b4 100644
--- a/clang-tools-extra/docs/clang-tidy/checks/list.rst
+++ b/clang-tools-extra/docs/clang-tidy/checks/list.rst
@@ -176,7 +176,6 @@ Clang-Tidy Checks
:doc:`cert-oop58-cpp <cert/oop58-cpp>`,
:doc:`concurrency-mt-unsafe <concurrency/mt-unsafe>`,
:doc:`concurrency-thread-canceltype-asynchronous <concurrency/thread-canceltype-asynchronous>`,
- :doc:`cppcoreguidelines-avoid-bounds-errors <cppcoreguidelines/avoid-bounds-errors>`, "Yes"
:doc:`cppcoreguidelines-avoid-capturing-lambda-coroutines <cppcoreguidelines/avoid-capturing-lambda-coroutines>`,
:doc:`cppcoreguidelines-avoid-const-or-ref-data-members <cppcoreguidelines/avoid-const-or-ref-data-members>`,
:doc:`cppcoreguidelines-avoid-do-while <cppcoreguidelines/avoid-do-while>`,
@@ -192,6 +191,7 @@ Clang-Tidy Checks
:doc:`cppcoreguidelines-no-malloc <cppcoreguidelines/no-malloc>`,
:doc:`cppcoreguidelines-no-suspend-with-lock <cppcoreguidelines/no-suspend-with-lock>`,
:doc:`cppcoreguidelines-owning-memory <cppcoreguidelines/owning-memory>`,
+ :doc:`cppcoreguidelines-prefer-at-over-subscript-operator <cppcoreguidelines/prefer-at-over-subscript-operator>`,
:doc:`cppcoreguidelines-prefer-member-initializer <cppcoreguidelines/prefer-member-initializer>`, "Yes"
:doc:`cppcoreguidelines-pro-bounds-array-to-pointer-decay <cppcoreguidelines/pro-bounds-array-to-pointer-decay>`,
:doc:`cppcoreguidelines-pro-bounds-constant-array-index <cppcoreguidelines/pro-bounds-constant-array-index>`, "Yes"
diff --git a/clang-tools-extra/test/clang-tidy/checkers/cppcoreguidelines/avoid-bounds-errors.cpp b/clang-tools-extra/test/clang-tidy/checkers/cppcoreguidelines/prefer-at-over-subscript-operator.cpp
similarity index 67%
rename from clang-tools-extra/test/clang-tidy/checkers/cppcoreguidelines/avoid-bounds-errors.cpp
rename to clang-tools-extra/test/clang-tidy/checkers/cppcoreguidelines/prefer-at-over-subscript-operator.cpp
index 5e12e7d71790d0..45071f8f9f2078 100644
--- a/clang-tools-extra/test/clang-tidy/checkers/cppcoreguidelines/avoid-bounds-errors.cpp
+++ b/clang-tools-extra/test/clang-tidy/checkers/cppcoreguidelines/prefer-at-over-subscript-operator.cpp
@@ -34,24 +34,24 @@ namespace json {
} // namespace json
-// RUN: %check_clang_tidy %s cppcoreguidelines-avoid-bounds-errors %t
+// RUN: %check_clang_tidy %s cppcoreguidelines-prefer-at-over-subscript-operator %t
std::array<int, 3> a;
auto b = a[0];
-// CHECK-MESSAGES: :[[@LINE-1]]:10: warning: found possibly unsafe operator[], consider using at() instead [cppcoreguidelines-avoid-bounds-errors]
+// CHECK-MESSAGES: :[[@LINE-1]]:10: warning: found possibly unsafe operator[], consider using at() instead [cppcoreguidelines-prefer-at-over-subscript-operator]
auto c = a[1+1];
-// CHECK-MESSAGES: :[[@LINE-1]]:10: warning: found possibly unsafe operator[], consider using at() instead [cppcoreguidelines-avoid-bounds-errors]
+// CHECK-MESSAGES: :[[@LINE-1]]:10: warning: found possibly unsafe operator[], consider using at() instead [cppcoreguidelines-prefer-at-over-subscript-operator]
constexpr int index = 1;
auto d = a[index];
-// CHECK-MESSAGES: :[[@LINE-1]]:10: warning: found possibly unsafe operator[], consider using at() instead [cppcoreguidelines-avoid-bounds-errors]
+// CHECK-MESSAGES: :[[@LINE-1]]:10: warning: found possibly unsafe operator[], consider using at() instead [cppcoreguidelines-prefer-at-over-subscript-operator]
int e(int index) {
return a[index];
-// CHECK-MESSAGES: :[[@LINE-1]]:10: warning: found possibly unsafe operator[], consider using at() instead [cppcoreguidelines-avoid-bounds-errors]
+// CHECK-MESSAGES: :[[@LINE-1]]:10: warning: found possibly unsafe operator[], consider using at() instead [cppcoreguidelines-prefer-at-over-subscript-operator]
}
auto f = (&a)->operator[](1);
-// CHECK-MESSAGES: :[[@LINE-1]]:10: warning: found possibly unsafe operator[], consider using at() instead [cppcoreguidelines-avoid-bounds-errors]
+// CHECK-MESSAGES: :[[@LINE-1]]:10: warning: found possibly unsafe operator[], consider using at() instead [cppcoreguidelines-prefer-at-over-subscript-operator]
auto g = a.at(0);
>From df49e2be814b711472bb7cee060d5a2fa3ba6770 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Paul=20Heidekr=C3=BCger?= <paul.heidekrueger at tum.de>
Date: Mon, 10 Jun 2024 22:14:54 +0200
Subject: [PATCH 05/48] Add a user-customizable mechanism for excluding classes
from the analysis
Co-authored-by: Manuel Pietsch <manuelpietsch at outlook.de>
---
.../PreferAtOverSubscriptOperatorCheck.cpp | 49 +++++++++++++++++--
.../PreferAtOverSubscriptOperatorCheck.h | 5 ++
.../prefer-at-over-subscript-operator.cpp | 36 +++++++++++++-
3 files changed, 86 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/clang-tools-extra/clang-tidy/cppcoreguidelines/PreferAtOverSubscriptOperatorCheck.cpp b/clang-tools-extra/clang-tidy/cppcoreguidelines/PreferAtOverSubscriptOperatorCheck.cpp
index 64eaf8a1d4ebd5..d7cdbc59d39410 100644
--- a/clang-tools-extra/clang-tidy/cppcoreguidelines/PreferAtOverSubscriptOperatorCheck.cpp
+++ b/clang-tools-extra/clang-tidy/cppcoreguidelines/PreferAtOverSubscriptOperatorCheck.cpp
@@ -7,13 +7,52 @@
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
#include "PreferAtOverSubscriptOperatorCheck.h"
+#include "../utils/OptionsUtils.h"
#include "clang/ASTMatchers/ASTMatchFinder.h"
-#include "clang/Lex/Lexer.h"
+#include "llvm/ADT/StringRef.h"
+#include <algorithm>
+#include <numeric>
using namespace clang::ast_matchers;
namespace clang::tidy::cppcoreguidelines {
+static constexpr std::array<llvm::StringRef, 3> DefaultExclusions = {
+ llvm::StringRef("std::map"), llvm::StringRef("std::unordered_map"),
+ llvm::StringRef("std::flat_map")};
+
+PreferAtOverSubscriptOperatorCheck::PreferAtOverSubscriptOperatorCheck(
+ StringRef Name, ClangTidyContext *Context)
+ : ClangTidyCheck(Name, Context) {
+
+ ExcludedClasses = clang::tidy::utils::options::parseStringList(
+ Options.get("ExcludeClasses", ""));
+ ExcludedClasses.insert(ExcludedClasses.end(), DefaultExclusions.begin(),
+ DefaultExclusions.end());
+}
+
+void PreferAtOverSubscriptOperatorCheck::storeOptions(
+ ClangTidyOptions::OptionMap &Opts) {
+
+ if (ExcludedClasses.size() == DefaultExclusions.size()) {
+ Options.store(Opts, "ExcludeClasses", "");
+ return;
+ }
+
+ // Sum up the sizes of the defaults ( + semicolons), so we can remove them
+ // from the saved options
+ size_t DefaultsStringLength =
+ std::transform_reduce(DefaultExclusions.begin(), DefaultExclusions.end(),
+ DefaultExclusions.size(), std::plus<>(),
+ [](llvm::StringRef Name) { return Name.size(); });
+
+ std::string Serialized =
+ clang::tidy::utils::options::serializeStringList(ExcludedClasses);
+
+ Options.store(Opts, "ExcludeClasses",
+ Serialized.substr(0, Serialized.size() - DefaultsStringLength));
+}
+
const CXXMethodDecl *findAlternative(const CXXRecordDecl *MatchedParent,
const CXXMethodDecl *MatchedOperator) {
for (const CXXMethodDecl *Method : MatchedParent->methods()) {
@@ -67,13 +106,17 @@ void PreferAtOverSubscriptOperatorCheck::check(
const CXXRecordDecl *MatchedParent =
Result.Nodes.getNodeAs<CXXRecordDecl>("parent");
+ std::string ClassIdentifier = MatchedParent->getQualifiedNameAsString();
+
+ if (std::find(ExcludedClasses.begin(), ExcludedClasses.end(),
+ ClassIdentifier) != ExcludedClasses.end())
+ return;
+
const CXXMethodDecl *Alternative =
findAlternative(MatchedParent, MatchedOperator);
if (!Alternative)
return;
- const SourceLocation AlternativeSource(Alternative->getBeginLoc());
-
diag(MatchedExpr->getBeginLoc(),
"found possibly unsafe operator[], consider using at() instead");
diag(Alternative->getBeginLoc(), "alternative at() defined here",
diff --git a/clang-tools-extra/clang-tidy/cppcoreguidelines/PreferAtOverSubscriptOperatorCheck.h b/clang-tools-extra/clang-tidy/cppcoreguidelines/PreferAtOverSubscriptOperatorCheck.h
index eb6e3a021e1b6c..f2450a7ab34708 100644
--- a/clang-tools-extra/clang-tidy/cppcoreguidelines/PreferAtOverSubscriptOperatorCheck.h
+++ b/clang-tools-extra/clang-tidy/cppcoreguidelines/PreferAtOverSubscriptOperatorCheck.h
@@ -28,6 +28,11 @@ class PreferAtOverSubscriptOperatorCheck : public ClangTidyCheck {
}
void registerMatchers(ast_matchers::MatchFinder *Finder) override;
void check(const ast_matchers::MatchFinder::MatchResult &Result) override;
+ void storeOptions(ClangTidyOptions::OptionMap &Opts) override;
+
+private:
+ // A list of class names that are excluded from the warning
+ std::vector<llvm::StringRef> ExcludedClasses;
};
} // namespace clang::tidy::cppcoreguidelines
diff --git a/clang-tools-extra/test/clang-tidy/checkers/cppcoreguidelines/prefer-at-over-subscript-operator.cpp b/clang-tools-extra/test/clang-tidy/checkers/cppcoreguidelines/prefer-at-over-subscript-operator.cpp
index 45071f8f9f2078..7da6c315569699 100644
--- a/clang-tools-extra/test/clang-tidy/checkers/cppcoreguidelines/prefer-at-over-subscript-operator.cpp
+++ b/clang-tools-extra/test/clang-tidy/checkers/cppcoreguidelines/prefer-at-over-subscript-operator.cpp
@@ -34,7 +34,30 @@ namespace json {
} // namespace json
-// RUN: %check_clang_tidy %s cppcoreguidelines-prefer-at-over-subscript-operator %t
+class ExcludedClass1 {
+ public:
+ int operator[](unsigned i) {
+ return 1;
+ }
+ int at(unsigned i) {
+ return 1;
+ }
+};
+
+class ExcludedClass2 {
+ public:
+ int operator[](unsigned i) {
+ return 1;
+ }
+ int at(unsigned i) {
+ return 1;
+ }
+};
+
+
+// RUN: %check_clang_tidy %s \
+// RUN: cppcoreguidelines-prefer-at-over-subscript-operator %t -- \
+// RUN: -config='{CheckOptions: {cppcoreguidelines-prefer-at-over-subscript-operator.ExcludeClasses: "ExcludedClass1;ExcludedClass2"}}'
std::array<int, 3> a;
auto b = a[0];
@@ -63,3 +86,14 @@ auto t = s[0];
json::node<int> n;
auto m = n[0];
+
+//explicitely excluded classes / struct / template
+ExcludedClass1 E1;
+auto x1 = E1[0];
+
+ExcludedClass2 E2;
+auto x2 = E1[0];
+
+std::map<int,int> TestMap;
+auto y = TestMap[0];
+
>From 4397e2209bb7c1a8d3d61414ec52d053527a17ce Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Paul=20Heidekr=C3=BCger?= <paul.heidekrueger at tum.de>
Date: Mon, 10 Jun 2024 22:16:49 +0200
Subject: [PATCH 06/48] Update the documentation
Co-authored-by: Manuel Pietsch <manuelpietsch at outlook.de>
---
.../prefer-at-over-subscript-operator.rst | 22 ++++++++++++++-----
1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/clang-tools-extra/docs/clang-tidy/checks/cppcoreguidelines/prefer-at-over-subscript-operator.rst b/clang-tools-extra/docs/clang-tidy/checks/cppcoreguidelines/prefer-at-over-subscript-operator.rst
index 183175b5966682..42a2100f32582c 100644
--- a/clang-tools-extra/docs/clang-tidy/checks/cppcoreguidelines/prefer-at-over-subscript-operator.rst
+++ b/clang-tools-extra/docs/clang-tidy/checks/cppcoreguidelines/prefer-at-over-subscript-operator.rst
@@ -3,8 +3,7 @@
cppcoreguidelines-prefer-at-over-subscript-operator
=====================================
-This check flags all uses of ``operator[]`` on ``std::vector``, ``std::array``, ``std::deque``, ``std::map``, ``std::unordered_map``, and ``std::flat_map`` and suggests to replace it with ``at()``.
-Note that ``std::span`` and ``std::mdspan`` do not support ``at()`` as of C++23, so the use of ``operator[]`` is not flagged.
+This check flags all uses of ``operator[]`` where an equivalent (same parameter and return types) ``at()`` method exists and suggest using that instead.
For example the code
@@ -12,10 +11,21 @@ For example the code
std::array<int, 3> a;
int b = a[4];
-will be replaced by
+will generate a warning but
.. code-block:: c++
- std::vector<int, 3> a;
- int b = a.at(4);
+ std::unique_ptr<int> a;
+ int b = a[0];
-This check enforces the `SL.con.3 <https://isocpp.github.io/CppCoreGuidelines/CppCoreGuidelines#slcon3-avoid-bounds-errors>` guideline.
+will not.
+
+The classes ``std::map``, ``std::unordered_map`` and ``std::flat_map`` are excluded from this check, because for them the subscript operator has a defined behaviour when a key does not exist (inserting a new element).
+
+Options
+-------
+
+.. option:: ExcludeClasses
+
+ Semicolon-delimited list of class names that should additionally be excluded from this check. By default empty.
+
+This check enforces part of the `SL.con.3 <https://isocpp.github.io/CppCoreGuidelines/CppCoreGuidelines#slcon3-avoid-bounds-errors>` guideline.
>From b3f5a8b7c9ec67f7b3ec831f85fa76ee26096338 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Paul=20Heidekr=C3=BCger?= <paul.heidekrueger at tum.de>
Date: Mon, 10 Jun 2024 21:43:23 +0200
Subject: [PATCH 07/48] Add remaining tests requested by @PiotrZSL
Co-authored-by: Manuel Pietsch <manuelpietsch at outlook.de>
---
.../prefer-at-over-subscript-operator.cpp | 53 +++++++++++++++++--
1 file changed, 48 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/clang-tools-extra/test/clang-tidy/checkers/cppcoreguidelines/prefer-at-over-subscript-operator.cpp b/clang-tools-extra/test/clang-tidy/checkers/cppcoreguidelines/prefer-at-over-subscript-operator.cpp
index 7da6c315569699..cc7088bffeda96 100644
--- a/clang-tools-extra/test/clang-tidy/checkers/cppcoreguidelines/prefer-at-over-subscript-operator.cpp
+++ b/clang-tools-extra/test/clang-tidy/checkers/cppcoreguidelines/prefer-at-over-subscript-operator.cpp
@@ -9,6 +9,16 @@ namespace std {
}
};
+ template<typename T, typename V>
+ struct map {
+ T operator[](unsigned i) {
+ return T{1};
+ }
+ T at(unsigned i) {
+ return T{1};
+ }
+ };
+
template<typename T>
struct unique_ptr {
T operator[](unsigned i) {
@@ -33,6 +43,7 @@ namespace json {
};
} // namespace json
+struct SubClass : std::array<int, 3> {};
class ExcludedClass1 {
public:
@@ -62,15 +73,17 @@ std::array<int, 3> a;
auto b = a[0];
// CHECK-MESSAGES: :[[@LINE-1]]:10: warning: found possibly unsafe operator[], consider using at() instead [cppcoreguidelines-prefer-at-over-subscript-operator]
+
auto c = a[1+1];
// CHECK-MESSAGES: :[[@LINE-1]]:10: warning: found possibly unsafe operator[], consider using at() instead [cppcoreguidelines-prefer-at-over-subscript-operator]
-constexpr int index = 1;
-auto d = a[index];
-// CHECK-MESSAGES: :[[@LINE-1]]:10: warning: found possibly unsafe operator[], consider using at() instead [cppcoreguidelines-prefer-at-over-subscript-operator]
-int e(int index) {
- return a[index];
+constexpr int Index = 1;
+auto d = a[Index];
// CHECK-MESSAGES: :[[@LINE-1]]:10: warning: found possibly unsafe operator[], consider using at() instead [cppcoreguidelines-prefer-at-over-subscript-operator]
+
+int e(int Ind) {
+ return a[Ind];
+ // CHECK-MESSAGES: :[[@LINE-1]]:10: warning: found possibly unsafe operator[], consider using at() instead [cppcoreguidelines-prefer-at-over-subscript-operator]
}
auto f = (&a)->operator[](1);
@@ -87,6 +100,24 @@ auto t = s[0];
json::node<int> n;
auto m = n[0];
+SubClass Sub;
+auto r = Sub[0];
+// CHECK-MESSAGES: :[[@LINE-1]]:10: warning: found possibly unsafe operator[], consider using at() instead [cppcoreguidelines-prefer-at-over-subscript-operator]
+
+typedef std::array<int, 3> ar;
+ar BehindDef;
+auto u = BehindDef[0];
+// CHECK-MESSAGES: :[[@LINE-1]]:10: warning: found possibly unsafe operator[], consider using at() instead [cppcoreguidelines-prefer-at-over-subscript-operator]
+
+template<typename T> int TestTemplate(T t){
+ return t[0];
+ // CHECK-MESSAGES: :[[@LINE-1]]:10: warning: found possibly unsafe operator[], consider using at() instead [cppcoreguidelines-prefer-at-over-subscript-operator]
+
+}
+
+auto v = TestTemplate<>(a);
+auto w = TestTemplate<>(p);
+
//explicitely excluded classes / struct / template
ExcludedClass1 E1;
auto x1 = E1[0];
@@ -97,3 +128,15 @@ auto x2 = E1[0];
std::map<int,int> TestMap;
auto y = TestMap[0];
+#define SUBSCRIPT_BEHIND_MARCO(x) a[x]
+#define ARG_BEHIND_MACRO 0
+#define OBJECT_BEHIND_MACRO a
+
+auto m1 = SUBSCRIPT_BEHIND_MARCO(0);
+// CHECK-MESSAGES: :[[@LINE-1]]:11: warning: found possibly unsafe operator[], consider using at() instead [cppcoreguidelines-prefer-at-over-subscript-operator]
+
+auto m2 = a[ARG_BEHIND_MACRO];
+// CHECK-MESSAGES: :[[@LINE-1]]:11: warning: found possibly unsafe operator[], consider using at() instead [cppcoreguidelines-prefer-at-over-subscript-operator]
+
+auto m3 = OBJECT_BEHIND_MACRO[0];
+// CHECK-MESSAGES: :[[@LINE-1]]:11: warning: found possibly unsafe operator[], consider using at() instead [cppcoreguidelines-prefer-at-over-subscript-operator]
>From bde547cb2c2bc34bf0a680c254e9267a8b8704a8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Paul=20Heidekr=C3=BCger?= <paul.heidekrueger at tum.de>
Date: Mon, 10 Jun 2024 22:22:21 +0200
Subject: [PATCH 08/48] Remove unused and rename variables
Co-authored-by: Manuel Pietsch <manuelpietsch at outlook.de>
---
.../PreferAtOverSubscriptOperatorCheck.cpp | 8 +++-----
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/clang-tools-extra/clang-tidy/cppcoreguidelines/PreferAtOverSubscriptOperatorCheck.cpp b/clang-tools-extra/clang-tidy/cppcoreguidelines/PreferAtOverSubscriptOperatorCheck.cpp
index d7cdbc59d39410..dc036e23e2af15 100644
--- a/clang-tools-extra/clang-tidy/cppcoreguidelines/PreferAtOverSubscriptOperatorCheck.cpp
+++ b/clang-tools-extra/clang-tidy/cppcoreguidelines/PreferAtOverSubscriptOperatorCheck.cpp
@@ -70,10 +70,10 @@ const CXXMethodDecl *findAlternative(const CXXRecordDecl *MatchedParent,
if (!SameNumberOfArguments)
continue;
- for (unsigned a = 0; a < Method->getNumParams(); a++) {
+ for (unsigned ArgInd = 0; ArgInd < Method->getNumParams(); ArgInd++) {
const bool SameArgType =
- Method->parameters()[a]->getOriginalType() ==
- MatchedOperator->parameters()[a]->getOriginalType();
+ Method->parameters()[ArgInd]->getOriginalType() ==
+ MatchedOperator->parameters()[ArgInd]->getOriginalType();
if (!SameArgType)
continue;
}
@@ -98,8 +98,6 @@ void PreferAtOverSubscriptOperatorCheck::registerMatchers(MatchFinder *Finder) {
void PreferAtOverSubscriptOperatorCheck::check(
const MatchFinder::MatchResult &Result) {
- const ASTContext &Context = *Result.Context;
- const SourceManager &Source = Context.getSourceManager();
const CallExpr *MatchedExpr = Result.Nodes.getNodeAs<CallExpr>("caller");
const CXXMethodDecl *MatchedOperator =
Result.Nodes.getNodeAs<CXXMethodDecl>("operator");
>From 1aeeee674a9744492f88b26f4a47edea39d94a39 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Paul=20Heidekr=C3=BCger?= <paul.heidekrueger at tum.de>
Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2024 16:56:40 +0200
Subject: [PATCH 09/48] Update types in
PreferAtOverSubscriptOperatorCheck::check()
Co-authored-by: Manuel Pietsch <manuelpietsch at outlook.de>
---
.../PreferAtOverSubscriptOperatorCheck.cpp | 7 +++----
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/clang-tools-extra/clang-tidy/cppcoreguidelines/PreferAtOverSubscriptOperatorCheck.cpp b/clang-tools-extra/clang-tidy/cppcoreguidelines/PreferAtOverSubscriptOperatorCheck.cpp
index dc036e23e2af15..0924fda164b4ad 100644
--- a/clang-tools-extra/clang-tidy/cppcoreguidelines/PreferAtOverSubscriptOperatorCheck.cpp
+++ b/clang-tools-extra/clang-tidy/cppcoreguidelines/PreferAtOverSubscriptOperatorCheck.cpp
@@ -98,11 +98,10 @@ void PreferAtOverSubscriptOperatorCheck::registerMatchers(MatchFinder *Finder) {
void PreferAtOverSubscriptOperatorCheck::check(
const MatchFinder::MatchResult &Result) {
- const CallExpr *MatchedExpr = Result.Nodes.getNodeAs<CallExpr>("caller");
- const CXXMethodDecl *MatchedOperator =
+ const auto *MatchedExpr = Result.Nodes.getNodeAs<CallExpr>("caller");
+ const auto *MatchedOperator =
Result.Nodes.getNodeAs<CXXMethodDecl>("operator");
- const CXXRecordDecl *MatchedParent =
- Result.Nodes.getNodeAs<CXXRecordDecl>("parent");
+ const auto *MatchedParent = Result.Nodes.getNodeAs<CXXRecordDecl>("parent");
std::string ClassIdentifier = MatchedParent->getQualifiedNameAsString();
>From 3b3294866fb66733cb66e9a2cbb5e4d1893bda9c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Paul=20Heidekr=C3=BCger?= <paul.heidekrueger at tum.de>
Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2024 17:00:00 +0200
Subject: [PATCH 10/48] Fix length of underline in
prefer-at-over-subscript-operator.rst
Co-authored-by: Manuel Pietsch <manuelpietsch at outlook.de>
---
.../cppcoreguidelines/prefer-at-over-subscript-operator.rst | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/clang-tools-extra/docs/clang-tidy/checks/cppcoreguidelines/prefer-at-over-subscript-operator.rst b/clang-tools-extra/docs/clang-tidy/checks/cppcoreguidelines/prefer-at-over-subscript-operator.rst
index 42a2100f32582c..96c71931ff2a31 100644
--- a/clang-tools-extra/docs/clang-tidy/checks/cppcoreguidelines/prefer-at-over-subscript-operator.rst
+++ b/clang-tools-extra/docs/clang-tidy/checks/cppcoreguidelines/prefer-at-over-subscript-operator.rst
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
.. title:: clang-tidy - cppcoreguidelines-prefer-at-over-subscript-operator
cppcoreguidelines-prefer-at-over-subscript-operator
-=====================================
+===================================================
This check flags all uses of ``operator[]`` where an equivalent (same parameter and return types) ``at()`` method exists and suggest using that instead.
>From 8434fbe7317daaee257d78ebb09fb2fc6334d3fd Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Paul=20Heidekr=C3=BCger?= <paul.heidekrueger at tum.de>
Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2024 17:02:33 +0200
Subject: [PATCH 11/48] Enforce 80 char column width in
prefer-at-over-subscript-operator.rst
Co-authored-by: Manuel Pietsch <manuelpietsch at outlook.de>
---
.../prefer-at-over-subscript-operator.rst | 14 ++++++++++----
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/clang-tools-extra/docs/clang-tidy/checks/cppcoreguidelines/prefer-at-over-subscript-operator.rst b/clang-tools-extra/docs/clang-tidy/checks/cppcoreguidelines/prefer-at-over-subscript-operator.rst
index 96c71931ff2a31..873564d12dd6b8 100644
--- a/clang-tools-extra/docs/clang-tidy/checks/cppcoreguidelines/prefer-at-over-subscript-operator.rst
+++ b/clang-tools-extra/docs/clang-tidy/checks/cppcoreguidelines/prefer-at-over-subscript-operator.rst
@@ -3,7 +3,8 @@
cppcoreguidelines-prefer-at-over-subscript-operator
===================================================
-This check flags all uses of ``operator[]`` where an equivalent (same parameter and return types) ``at()`` method exists and suggest using that instead.
+This check flags all uses of ``operator[]`` where an equivalent (same parameter
+and return types) ``at()`` method exists and suggest using that instead.
For example the code
@@ -19,13 +20,18 @@ will generate a warning but
will not.
-The classes ``std::map``, ``std::unordered_map`` and ``std::flat_map`` are excluded from this check, because for them the subscript operator has a defined behaviour when a key does not exist (inserting a new element).
+The classes ``std::map``, ``std::unordered_map`` and ``std::flat_map`` are
+excluded from this check, because for them the subscript operator has a defined
+behaviour when a key does not exist (inserting a new element).
Options
-------
.. option:: ExcludeClasses
- Semicolon-delimited list of class names that should additionally be excluded from this check. By default empty.
+ Semicolon-delimited list of class names that should additionally be
+ excluded from this check. By default empty.
-This check enforces part of the `SL.con.3 <https://isocpp.github.io/CppCoreGuidelines/CppCoreGuidelines#slcon3-avoid-bounds-errors>` guideline.
+This check enforces part of the `SL.con.3
+<https://isocpp.github.io/CppCoreGuidelines/CppCoreGuidelines#slcon3-avoid-bounds-errors>`
+guideline.
>From 0c25802ff24a1c112f0a83cf945d8bdd470640b9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Paul=20Heidekr=C3=BCger?= <paul.heidekrueger at tum.de>
Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2024 10:18:58 +0200
Subject: [PATCH 12/48] Synchronise prefer-at-over-subscript-operator.rst with
ReleaseNotes.rst
Co-authored-by: Manuel Pietsch <manuelpietsch at outlook.de>
---
.../cppcoreguidelines/prefer-at-over-subscript-operator.rst | 3 +--
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/clang-tools-extra/docs/clang-tidy/checks/cppcoreguidelines/prefer-at-over-subscript-operator.rst b/clang-tools-extra/docs/clang-tidy/checks/cppcoreguidelines/prefer-at-over-subscript-operator.rst
index 873564d12dd6b8..7999cd4baeb7c1 100644
--- a/clang-tools-extra/docs/clang-tidy/checks/cppcoreguidelines/prefer-at-over-subscript-operator.rst
+++ b/clang-tools-extra/docs/clang-tidy/checks/cppcoreguidelines/prefer-at-over-subscript-operator.rst
@@ -3,8 +3,7 @@
cppcoreguidelines-prefer-at-over-subscript-operator
===================================================
-This check flags all uses of ``operator[]`` where an equivalent (same parameter
-and return types) ``at()`` method exists and suggest using that instead.
+Flags the unsafe ``operator[]`` and suggests replacing it with ``at()``.
For example the code
>From 07bf1081d39ea03dc1cc5c6065dc28d149f82864 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Paul=20Heidekr=C3=BCger?= <paul.heidekrueger at tum.de>
Date: Mon, 17 Jun 2024 12:03:57 +0200
Subject: [PATCH 13/48] Move RUN lines to the top of
prefer-at-over-subscript-operator.cpp
Co-authored-by: Manuel Pietsch <manuelpietsch at outlook.de>
---
.../prefer-at-over-subscript-operator.cpp | 8 ++++----
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/clang-tools-extra/test/clang-tidy/checkers/cppcoreguidelines/prefer-at-over-subscript-operator.cpp b/clang-tools-extra/test/clang-tidy/checkers/cppcoreguidelines/prefer-at-over-subscript-operator.cpp
index cc7088bffeda96..76b84bf860cb61 100644
--- a/clang-tools-extra/test/clang-tidy/checkers/cppcoreguidelines/prefer-at-over-subscript-operator.cpp
+++ b/clang-tools-extra/test/clang-tidy/checkers/cppcoreguidelines/prefer-at-over-subscript-operator.cpp
@@ -1,3 +1,7 @@
+// RUN: %check_clang_tidy %s \
+// RUN: cppcoreguidelines-prefer-at-over-subscript-operator %t -- \
+// RUN: -config='{CheckOptions: {cppcoreguidelines-prefer-at-over-subscript-operator.ExcludeClasses: "ExcludedClass1;ExcludedClass2"}}'
+
namespace std {
template<typename T, unsigned size>
struct array {
@@ -65,10 +69,6 @@ class ExcludedClass2 {
}
};
-
-// RUN: %check_clang_tidy %s \
-// RUN: cppcoreguidelines-prefer-at-over-subscript-operator %t -- \
-// RUN: -config='{CheckOptions: {cppcoreguidelines-prefer-at-over-subscript-operator.ExcludeClasses: "ExcludedClass1;ExcludedClass2"}}'
std::array<int, 3> a;
auto b = a[0];
>From 838e0886ad53cbfbbbac12928558a73f3ae917f6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Paul=20Heidekr=C3=BCger?= <paul.heidekrueger at tum.de>
Date: Mon, 17 Jun 2024 12:05:10 +0200
Subject: [PATCH 14/48] Add an empty lien after each `code-block` in
prefer-at-over-subscript-operator.rst
Co-authored-by: Manuel Pietsch <manuelpietsch at outlook.de>
---
.../cppcoreguidelines/prefer-at-over-subscript-operator.rst | 2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
diff --git a/clang-tools-extra/docs/clang-tidy/checks/cppcoreguidelines/prefer-at-over-subscript-operator.rst b/clang-tools-extra/docs/clang-tidy/checks/cppcoreguidelines/prefer-at-over-subscript-operator.rst
index 7999cd4baeb7c1..f3577cb5b15f09 100644
--- a/clang-tools-extra/docs/clang-tidy/checks/cppcoreguidelines/prefer-at-over-subscript-operator.rst
+++ b/clang-tools-extra/docs/clang-tidy/checks/cppcoreguidelines/prefer-at-over-subscript-operator.rst
@@ -8,12 +8,14 @@ Flags the unsafe ``operator[]`` and suggests replacing it with ``at()``.
For example the code
.. code-block:: c++
+
std::array<int, 3> a;
int b = a[4];
will generate a warning but
.. code-block:: c++
+
std::unique_ptr<int> a;
int b = a[0];
>From 5e3e0f71aaf576b8bc90248eb06449f98744a49b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Paul=20Heidekr=C3=BCger?= <paul.heidekrueger at tum.de>
Date: Mon, 17 Jun 2024 12:08:56 +0200
Subject: [PATCH 15/48] Use ofClass() instead of hasParent() in
PreferAtOverSubscriptOperatorCheck.cpp
Co-authored-by: Manuel Pietsch <manuelpietsch at outlook.de>
---
.../cppcoreguidelines/PreferAtOverSubscriptOperatorCheck.cpp | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/clang-tools-extra/clang-tidy/cppcoreguidelines/PreferAtOverSubscriptOperatorCheck.cpp b/clang-tools-extra/clang-tidy/cppcoreguidelines/PreferAtOverSubscriptOperatorCheck.cpp
index 0924fda164b4ad..d047c0b2332d11 100644
--- a/clang-tools-extra/clang-tidy/cppcoreguidelines/PreferAtOverSubscriptOperatorCheck.cpp
+++ b/clang-tools-extra/clang-tidy/cppcoreguidelines/PreferAtOverSubscriptOperatorCheck.cpp
@@ -90,8 +90,8 @@ void PreferAtOverSubscriptOperatorCheck::registerMatchers(MatchFinder *Finder) {
callExpr(
callee(
cxxMethodDecl(hasOverloadedOperatorName("[]")).bind("operator")),
- callee(cxxMethodDecl(hasParent(
- cxxRecordDecl(hasMethod(hasName("at"))).bind("parent")))))
+ callee(cxxMethodDecl(
+ ofClass(cxxRecordDecl(hasMethod(hasName("at"))).bind("parent")))))
.bind("caller"),
this);
}
>From ebf03f6992fb1dd9047f1f3ad0ccd025b29d0b77 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Paul=20Heidekr=C3=BCger?= <paul.heidekrueger at tum.de>
Date: Mon, 17 Jun 2024 12:42:33 +0200
Subject: [PATCH 16/48] Use matchesAnyListedName() in matcher instead of
explicit std::find() check
Co-authored-by: Manuel Pietsch <manuelpietsch at outlook.de>
---
.../PreferAtOverSubscriptOperatorCheck.cpp | 15 +++++----------
.../prefer-at-over-subscript-operator.cpp | 2 +-
2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
diff --git a/clang-tools-extra/clang-tidy/cppcoreguidelines/PreferAtOverSubscriptOperatorCheck.cpp b/clang-tools-extra/clang-tidy/cppcoreguidelines/PreferAtOverSubscriptOperatorCheck.cpp
index d047c0b2332d11..82a957241042a1 100644
--- a/clang-tools-extra/clang-tidy/cppcoreguidelines/PreferAtOverSubscriptOperatorCheck.cpp
+++ b/clang-tools-extra/clang-tidy/cppcoreguidelines/PreferAtOverSubscriptOperatorCheck.cpp
@@ -7,10 +7,10 @@
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
#include "PreferAtOverSubscriptOperatorCheck.h"
+#include "../utils/Matchers.h"
#include "../utils/OptionsUtils.h"
#include "clang/ASTMatchers/ASTMatchFinder.h"
#include "llvm/ADT/StringRef.h"
-#include <algorithm>
#include <numeric>
using namespace clang::ast_matchers;
@@ -18,8 +18,8 @@ using namespace clang::ast_matchers;
namespace clang::tidy::cppcoreguidelines {
static constexpr std::array<llvm::StringRef, 3> DefaultExclusions = {
- llvm::StringRef("std::map"), llvm::StringRef("std::unordered_map"),
- llvm::StringRef("std::flat_map")};
+ llvm::StringRef("::std::map"), llvm::StringRef("::std::unordered_map"),
+ llvm::StringRef("::std::flat_map")};
PreferAtOverSubscriptOperatorCheck::PreferAtOverSubscriptOperatorCheck(
StringRef Name, ClangTidyContext *Context)
@@ -91,7 +91,8 @@ void PreferAtOverSubscriptOperatorCheck::registerMatchers(MatchFinder *Finder) {
callee(
cxxMethodDecl(hasOverloadedOperatorName("[]")).bind("operator")),
callee(cxxMethodDecl(
- ofClass(cxxRecordDecl(hasMethod(hasName("at"))).bind("parent")))))
+ ofClass(cxxRecordDecl(hasMethod(hasName("at"))).bind("parent")),
+ unless(matchers::matchesAnyListedName(ExcludedClasses)))))
.bind("caller"),
this);
}
@@ -103,12 +104,6 @@ void PreferAtOverSubscriptOperatorCheck::check(
Result.Nodes.getNodeAs<CXXMethodDecl>("operator");
const auto *MatchedParent = Result.Nodes.getNodeAs<CXXRecordDecl>("parent");
- std::string ClassIdentifier = MatchedParent->getQualifiedNameAsString();
-
- if (std::find(ExcludedClasses.begin(), ExcludedClasses.end(),
- ClassIdentifier) != ExcludedClasses.end())
- return;
-
const CXXMethodDecl *Alternative =
findAlternative(MatchedParent, MatchedOperator);
if (!Alternative)
diff --git a/clang-tools-extra/test/clang-tidy/checkers/cppcoreguidelines/prefer-at-over-subscript-operator.cpp b/clang-tools-extra/test/clang-tidy/checkers/cppcoreguidelines/prefer-at-over-subscript-operator.cpp
index 76b84bf860cb61..4ae17688cb9e29 100644
--- a/clang-tools-extra/test/clang-tidy/checkers/cppcoreguidelines/prefer-at-over-subscript-operator.cpp
+++ b/clang-tools-extra/test/clang-tidy/checkers/cppcoreguidelines/prefer-at-over-subscript-operator.cpp
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
// RUN: %check_clang_tidy %s \
// RUN: cppcoreguidelines-prefer-at-over-subscript-operator %t -- \
-// RUN: -config='{CheckOptions: {cppcoreguidelines-prefer-at-over-subscript-operator.ExcludeClasses: "ExcludedClass1;ExcludedClass2"}}'
+// RUN: -config='{CheckOptions: {cppcoreguidelines-prefer-at-over-subscript-operator.ExcludeClasses: "::ExcludedClass1;::ExcludedClass2"}}'
namespace std {
template<typename T, unsigned size>
>From bda7134367ced1a1b895f7df929908536db7968b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Paul=20Heidekr=C3=BCger?= <paul.heidekrueger at tum.de>
Date: Mon, 17 Jun 2024 14:23:35 +0200
Subject: [PATCH 17/48] Match source range of expression in warnings emitted by
PreferAtOverSubscriptOperatorCheck
Co-authored-by: Manuel Pietsch <manuelpietsch at outlook.de>
---
.../PreferAtOverSubscriptOperatorCheck.cpp | 6 ++++--
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/clang-tools-extra/clang-tidy/cppcoreguidelines/PreferAtOverSubscriptOperatorCheck.cpp b/clang-tools-extra/clang-tidy/cppcoreguidelines/PreferAtOverSubscriptOperatorCheck.cpp
index 82a957241042a1..5a5704deae14f2 100644
--- a/clang-tools-extra/clang-tidy/cppcoreguidelines/PreferAtOverSubscriptOperatorCheck.cpp
+++ b/clang-tools-extra/clang-tidy/cppcoreguidelines/PreferAtOverSubscriptOperatorCheck.cpp
@@ -110,9 +110,11 @@ void PreferAtOverSubscriptOperatorCheck::check(
return;
diag(MatchedExpr->getBeginLoc(),
- "found possibly unsafe operator[], consider using at() instead");
+ "found possibly unsafe operator[], consider using at() instead")
+ << MatchedExpr->getSourceRange();
diag(Alternative->getBeginLoc(), "alternative at() defined here",
- DiagnosticIDs::Note);
+ DiagnosticIDs::Note)
+ << Alternative->getSourceRange();
}
} // namespace clang::tidy::cppcoreguidelines
>From c25c39e33341b224d3564e61117ebe911cb583bf Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Paul=20Heidekr=C3=BCger?= <paul.heidekrueger at tum.de>
Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2024 10:42:45 +0200
Subject: [PATCH 18/48] PreferAtOverSubscriptOpterator ->
ProBoundsAvoidUncheckedContainerAccesses
Co-authored-by: Manuel Pietsch <manuelpietsch at outlook.de>
---
.../cppcoreguidelines/CMakeLists.txt | 2 +-
.../CppCoreGuidelinesTidyModule.cpp | 6 ++---
...BoundsAvoidUncheckedContainerAccesses.cpp} | 16 +++++++-----
...roBoundsAvoidUncheckedContainerAccesses.h} | 15 ++++++-----
clang-tools-extra/docs/ReleaseNotes.rst | 4 +--
...ds-avoid-unchecked-container-accesses.rst} | 4 +--
.../docs/clang-tidy/checks/list.rst | 2 +-
...ds-avoid-unchecked-container-accesses.cpp} | 26 +++++++++----------
8 files changed, 39 insertions(+), 36 deletions(-)
rename clang-tools-extra/clang-tidy/cppcoreguidelines/{PreferAtOverSubscriptOperatorCheck.cpp => ProBoundsAvoidUncheckedContainerAccesses.cpp} (88%)
rename clang-tools-extra/clang-tidy/cppcoreguidelines/{PreferAtOverSubscriptOperatorCheck.h => ProBoundsAvoidUncheckedContainerAccesses.h} (67%)
rename clang-tools-extra/docs/clang-tidy/checks/cppcoreguidelines/{prefer-at-over-subscript-operator.rst => pro-bounds-avoid-unchecked-container-accesses.rst} (84%)
rename clang-tools-extra/test/clang-tidy/checkers/cppcoreguidelines/{prefer-at-over-subscript-operator.cpp => pro-bounds-avoid-unchecked-container-accesses.cpp} (82%)
diff --git a/clang-tools-extra/clang-tidy/cppcoreguidelines/CMakeLists.txt b/clang-tools-extra/clang-tidy/cppcoreguidelines/CMakeLists.txt
index fd436859ad04a3..aa7bdd86bc7957 100644
--- a/clang-tools-extra/clang-tidy/cppcoreguidelines/CMakeLists.txt
+++ b/clang-tools-extra/clang-tidy/cppcoreguidelines/CMakeLists.txt
@@ -20,9 +20,9 @@ add_clang_library(clangTidyCppCoreGuidelinesModule
NoMallocCheck.cpp
NoSuspendWithLockCheck.cpp
OwningMemoryCheck.cpp
- PreferAtOverSubscriptOperatorCheck.cpp
PreferMemberInitializerCheck.cpp
ProBoundsArrayToPointerDecayCheck.cpp
+ ProBoundsAvoidUncheckedContainerAccesses.cpp
ProBoundsConstantArrayIndexCheck.cpp
ProBoundsPointerArithmeticCheck.cpp
ProTypeConstCastCheck.cpp
diff --git a/clang-tools-extra/clang-tidy/cppcoreguidelines/CppCoreGuidelinesTidyModule.cpp b/clang-tools-extra/clang-tidy/cppcoreguidelines/CppCoreGuidelinesTidyModule.cpp
index 565a99a865519c..c154f4eec9373a 100644
--- a/clang-tools-extra/clang-tidy/cppcoreguidelines/CppCoreGuidelinesTidyModule.cpp
+++ b/clang-tools-extra/clang-tidy/cppcoreguidelines/CppCoreGuidelinesTidyModule.cpp
@@ -34,9 +34,9 @@
#include "NoMallocCheck.h"
#include "NoSuspendWithLockCheck.h"
#include "OwningMemoryCheck.h"
-#include "PreferAtOverSubscriptOperatorCheck.h"
#include "PreferMemberInitializerCheck.h"
#include "ProBoundsArrayToPointerDecayCheck.h"
+#include "ProBoundsAvoidUncheckedContainerAccesses.h"
#include "ProBoundsConstantArrayIndexCheck.h"
#include "ProBoundsPointerArithmeticCheck.h"
#include "ProTypeConstCastCheck.h"
@@ -103,12 +103,12 @@ class CppCoreGuidelinesModule : public ClangTidyModule {
"cppcoreguidelines-non-private-member-variables-in-classes");
CheckFactories.registerCheck<OwningMemoryCheck>(
"cppcoreguidelines-owning-memory");
- CheckFactories.registerCheck<PreferAtOverSubscriptOperatorCheck>(
- "cppcoreguidelines-prefer-at-over-subscript-operator");
CheckFactories.registerCheck<PreferMemberInitializerCheck>(
"cppcoreguidelines-prefer-member-initializer");
CheckFactories.registerCheck<ProBoundsArrayToPointerDecayCheck>(
"cppcoreguidelines-pro-bounds-array-to-pointer-decay");
+ CheckFactories.registerCheck<ProBoundsAvoidUncheckedContainerAccesses>(
+ "cppcoreguidelines-pro-bounds-avoid-unchecked-container-accesses");
CheckFactories.registerCheck<ProBoundsConstantArrayIndexCheck>(
"cppcoreguidelines-pro-bounds-constant-array-index");
CheckFactories.registerCheck<ProBoundsPointerArithmeticCheck>(
diff --git a/clang-tools-extra/clang-tidy/cppcoreguidelines/PreferAtOverSubscriptOperatorCheck.cpp b/clang-tools-extra/clang-tidy/cppcoreguidelines/ProBoundsAvoidUncheckedContainerAccesses.cpp
similarity index 88%
rename from clang-tools-extra/clang-tidy/cppcoreguidelines/PreferAtOverSubscriptOperatorCheck.cpp
rename to clang-tools-extra/clang-tidy/cppcoreguidelines/ProBoundsAvoidUncheckedContainerAccesses.cpp
index 5a5704deae14f2..19a52d0e565fa4 100644
--- a/clang-tools-extra/clang-tidy/cppcoreguidelines/PreferAtOverSubscriptOperatorCheck.cpp
+++ b/clang-tools-extra/clang-tidy/cppcoreguidelines/ProBoundsAvoidUncheckedContainerAccesses.cpp
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-//===--- PreferAtOverSubscriptOperatorCheck.cpp - clang-tidy --------------===//
+//===--- ProBoundsAvoidUncheckedContainerAccesses.cpp - clang-tidy --------===//
//
// Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM Exceptions.
// See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information.
@@ -6,7 +6,7 @@
//
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
-#include "PreferAtOverSubscriptOperatorCheck.h"
+#include "ProBoundsAvoidUncheckedContainerAccesses.h"
#include "../utils/Matchers.h"
#include "../utils/OptionsUtils.h"
#include "clang/ASTMatchers/ASTMatchFinder.h"
@@ -21,8 +21,9 @@ static constexpr std::array<llvm::StringRef, 3> DefaultExclusions = {
llvm::StringRef("::std::map"), llvm::StringRef("::std::unordered_map"),
llvm::StringRef("::std::flat_map")};
-PreferAtOverSubscriptOperatorCheck::PreferAtOverSubscriptOperatorCheck(
- StringRef Name, ClangTidyContext *Context)
+ProBoundsAvoidUncheckedContainerAccesses::
+ ProBoundsAvoidUncheckedContainerAccesses(StringRef Name,
+ ClangTidyContext *Context)
: ClangTidyCheck(Name, Context) {
ExcludedClasses = clang::tidy::utils::options::parseStringList(
@@ -31,7 +32,7 @@ PreferAtOverSubscriptOperatorCheck::PreferAtOverSubscriptOperatorCheck(
DefaultExclusions.end());
}
-void PreferAtOverSubscriptOperatorCheck::storeOptions(
+void ProBoundsAvoidUncheckedContainerAccesses::storeOptions(
ClangTidyOptions::OptionMap &Opts) {
if (ExcludedClasses.size() == DefaultExclusions.size()) {
@@ -83,7 +84,8 @@ const CXXMethodDecl *findAlternative(const CXXRecordDecl *MatchedParent,
return static_cast<CXXMethodDecl *>(nullptr);
}
-void PreferAtOverSubscriptOperatorCheck::registerMatchers(MatchFinder *Finder) {
+void ProBoundsAvoidUncheckedContainerAccesses::registerMatchers(
+ MatchFinder *Finder) {
// Need a callExpr here to match CXXOperatorCallExpr ``(&a)->operator[](0)``
// and CXXMemberCallExpr ``a[0]``.
Finder->addMatcher(
@@ -97,7 +99,7 @@ void PreferAtOverSubscriptOperatorCheck::registerMatchers(MatchFinder *Finder) {
this);
}
-void PreferAtOverSubscriptOperatorCheck::check(
+void ProBoundsAvoidUncheckedContainerAccesses::check(
const MatchFinder::MatchResult &Result) {
const auto *MatchedExpr = Result.Nodes.getNodeAs<CallExpr>("caller");
const auto *MatchedOperator =
diff --git a/clang-tools-extra/clang-tidy/cppcoreguidelines/PreferAtOverSubscriptOperatorCheck.h b/clang-tools-extra/clang-tidy/cppcoreguidelines/ProBoundsAvoidUncheckedContainerAccesses.h
similarity index 67%
rename from clang-tools-extra/clang-tidy/cppcoreguidelines/PreferAtOverSubscriptOperatorCheck.h
rename to clang-tools-extra/clang-tidy/cppcoreguidelines/ProBoundsAvoidUncheckedContainerAccesses.h
index f2450a7ab34708..33abbef5e82437 100644
--- a/clang-tools-extra/clang-tidy/cppcoreguidelines/PreferAtOverSubscriptOperatorCheck.h
+++ b/clang-tools-extra/clang-tidy/cppcoreguidelines/ProBoundsAvoidUncheckedContainerAccesses.h
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-//===--- PreferAtOverSubscriptOperatorCheck.h - clang-tidy ------*- C++ -*-===//
+//===--- ProBoundsAvoidUncheckedContainerAccesses.h - clang-tidy *- C++ -*-===//
//===--- PreferMemberInitializerCheck.h - clang-tidy ------------*- C++ -*-===//
//
// Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM Exceptions.
@@ -7,8 +7,8 @@
//
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
-#ifndef LLVM_CLANG_TOOLS_EXTRA_CLANG_TIDY_CPPCOREGUIDELINES_PREFERATOVERSUBSCRIPTOPERATORCHECK_H
-#define LLVM_CLANG_TOOLS_EXTRA_CLANG_TIDY_CPPCOREGUIDELINES_PREFERATOVERSUBSCRIPTOPERATORCHECK_H
+#ifndef LLVM_CLANG_TOOLS_EXTRA_CLANG_TIDY_CPPCOREGUIDELINES_PRO_BOUNDS_AVOID_UNCHECKED_CONTAINER_ACCESSES_H
+#define LLVM_CLANG_TOOLS_EXTRA_CLANG_TIDY_CPPCOREGUIDELINES_PRO_BOUNDS_AVOID_UNCHECKED_CONTAINER_ACCESSES_H
#include "../ClangTidyCheck.h"
@@ -19,10 +19,11 @@ namespace clang::tidy::cppcoreguidelines {
/// See
/// https://isocpp.github.io/CppCoreGuidelines/CppCoreGuidelines#slcon3-avoid-bounds-errors
/// For the user-facing documentation see:
-/// http://clang.llvm.org/extra/clang-tidy/checks/cppcoreguidelines/prefer-at-over-subscript-operator.html
-class PreferAtOverSubscriptOperatorCheck : public ClangTidyCheck {
+/// http://clang.llvm.org/extra/clang-tidy/checks/cppcoreguidelines/pro-bounds-avoid-unchecked-container-accesses.html
+class ProBoundsAvoidUncheckedContainerAccesses : public ClangTidyCheck {
public:
- PreferAtOverSubscriptOperatorCheck(StringRef Name, ClangTidyContext *Context);
+ ProBoundsAvoidUncheckedContainerAccesses(StringRef Name,
+ ClangTidyContext *Context);
bool isLanguageVersionSupported(const LangOptions &LangOpts) const override {
return LangOpts.CPlusPlus;
}
@@ -37,4 +38,4 @@ class PreferAtOverSubscriptOperatorCheck : public ClangTidyCheck {
} // namespace clang::tidy::cppcoreguidelines
-#endif // LLVM_CLANG_TOOLS_EXTRA_CLANG_TIDY_CPPCOREGUIDELINES_PREFERATOVERSUBSCRIPTOPERATORCHECK_H
+#endif // LLVM_CLANG_TOOLS_EXTRA_CLANG_TIDY_CPPCOREGUIDELINES_PRO_BOUNDS_AVOID_UNCHECKED_CONTAINER_ACCESSES_H
diff --git a/clang-tools-extra/docs/ReleaseNotes.rst b/clang-tools-extra/docs/ReleaseNotes.rst
index 61e30057d8dc73..dd08e3cfb56fbc 100644
--- a/clang-tools-extra/docs/ReleaseNotes.rst
+++ b/clang-tools-extra/docs/ReleaseNotes.rst
@@ -133,8 +133,8 @@ New checks
Replaces nested ``std::min`` and ``std::max`` calls with an initializer list
where applicable.
-- New :doc:`cppcoreguidelines-prefer-at-over-subscript-operator
- <clang-tidy/checks/cppcoreguidelines/prefer-at-over-subscript-operator>` check.
+- New :doc:`cppcoreguidelines-pro-bounds-avoid-unchecked-container-accesses
+ <clang-tidy/checks/cppcoreguidelines/pro-bounds-avoid-unchecked-container-accesses>` check.
Flags the unsafe ``operator[]`` and suggests replacing it with ``at()``.
diff --git a/clang-tools-extra/docs/clang-tidy/checks/cppcoreguidelines/prefer-at-over-subscript-operator.rst b/clang-tools-extra/docs/clang-tidy/checks/cppcoreguidelines/pro-bounds-avoid-unchecked-container-accesses.rst
similarity index 84%
rename from clang-tools-extra/docs/clang-tidy/checks/cppcoreguidelines/prefer-at-over-subscript-operator.rst
rename to clang-tools-extra/docs/clang-tidy/checks/cppcoreguidelines/pro-bounds-avoid-unchecked-container-accesses.rst
index f3577cb5b15f09..616882738653d0 100644
--- a/clang-tools-extra/docs/clang-tidy/checks/cppcoreguidelines/prefer-at-over-subscript-operator.rst
+++ b/clang-tools-extra/docs/clang-tidy/checks/cppcoreguidelines/pro-bounds-avoid-unchecked-container-accesses.rst
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
-.. title:: clang-tidy - cppcoreguidelines-prefer-at-over-subscript-operator
+.. title:: clang-tidy - cppcoreguidelines-pro-bounds-avoid-unchecked-container-accesses
-cppcoreguidelines-prefer-at-over-subscript-operator
+cppcoreguidelines-pro-bounds-avoid-unchecked-container-accesses
===================================================
Flags the unsafe ``operator[]`` and suggests replacing it with ``at()``.
diff --git a/clang-tools-extra/docs/clang-tidy/checks/list.rst b/clang-tools-extra/docs/clang-tidy/checks/list.rst
index 51aa36bb8d09b4..bc774e0010d441 100644
--- a/clang-tools-extra/docs/clang-tidy/checks/list.rst
+++ b/clang-tools-extra/docs/clang-tidy/checks/list.rst
@@ -191,9 +191,9 @@ Clang-Tidy Checks
:doc:`cppcoreguidelines-no-malloc <cppcoreguidelines/no-malloc>`,
:doc:`cppcoreguidelines-no-suspend-with-lock <cppcoreguidelines/no-suspend-with-lock>`,
:doc:`cppcoreguidelines-owning-memory <cppcoreguidelines/owning-memory>`,
- :doc:`cppcoreguidelines-prefer-at-over-subscript-operator <cppcoreguidelines/prefer-at-over-subscript-operator>`,
:doc:`cppcoreguidelines-prefer-member-initializer <cppcoreguidelines/prefer-member-initializer>`, "Yes"
:doc:`cppcoreguidelines-pro-bounds-array-to-pointer-decay <cppcoreguidelines/pro-bounds-array-to-pointer-decay>`,
+ :doc:`cppcoreguidelines-pro-bounds-avoid-unchecked-container-accesses <cppcoreguidelines/pro-bounds-avoid-unchecked-container-accesses>`,
:doc:`cppcoreguidelines-pro-bounds-constant-array-index <cppcoreguidelines/pro-bounds-constant-array-index>`, "Yes"
:doc:`cppcoreguidelines-pro-bounds-pointer-arithmetic <cppcoreguidelines/pro-bounds-pointer-arithmetic>`,
:doc:`cppcoreguidelines-pro-type-const-cast <cppcoreguidelines/pro-type-const-cast>`,
diff --git a/clang-tools-extra/test/clang-tidy/checkers/cppcoreguidelines/prefer-at-over-subscript-operator.cpp b/clang-tools-extra/test/clang-tidy/checkers/cppcoreguidelines/pro-bounds-avoid-unchecked-container-accesses.cpp
similarity index 82%
rename from clang-tools-extra/test/clang-tidy/checkers/cppcoreguidelines/prefer-at-over-subscript-operator.cpp
rename to clang-tools-extra/test/clang-tidy/checkers/cppcoreguidelines/pro-bounds-avoid-unchecked-container-accesses.cpp
index 4ae17688cb9e29..1a7a7fba7d8a27 100644
--- a/clang-tools-extra/test/clang-tidy/checkers/cppcoreguidelines/prefer-at-over-subscript-operator.cpp
+++ b/clang-tools-extra/test/clang-tidy/checkers/cppcoreguidelines/pro-bounds-avoid-unchecked-container-accesses.cpp
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
// RUN: %check_clang_tidy %s \
-// RUN: cppcoreguidelines-prefer-at-over-subscript-operator %t -- \
-// RUN: -config='{CheckOptions: {cppcoreguidelines-prefer-at-over-subscript-operator.ExcludeClasses: "::ExcludedClass1;::ExcludedClass2"}}'
+// RUN: cppcoreguidelines-pro-bounds-avoid-unchecked-container-accesses %t -- \
+// RUN: -config='{CheckOptions: {cppcoreguidelines-pro-bounds-avoid-unchecked-container-accesses.ExcludeClasses: "::ExcludedClass1;::ExcludedClass2"}}'
namespace std {
template<typename T, unsigned size>
@@ -72,22 +72,22 @@ class ExcludedClass2 {
std::array<int, 3> a;
auto b = a[0];
-// CHECK-MESSAGES: :[[@LINE-1]]:10: warning: found possibly unsafe operator[], consider using at() instead [cppcoreguidelines-prefer-at-over-subscript-operator]
+// CHECK-MESSAGES: :[[@LINE-1]]:10: warning: found possibly unsafe operator[], consider using at() instead [cppcoreguidelines-pro-bounds-avoid-unchecked-container-accesses]
auto c = a[1+1];
-// CHECK-MESSAGES: :[[@LINE-1]]:10: warning: found possibly unsafe operator[], consider using at() instead [cppcoreguidelines-prefer-at-over-subscript-operator]
+// CHECK-MESSAGES: :[[@LINE-1]]:10: warning: found possibly unsafe operator[], consider using at() instead [cppcoreguidelines-pro-bounds-avoid-unchecked-container-accesses]
constexpr int Index = 1;
auto d = a[Index];
-// CHECK-MESSAGES: :[[@LINE-1]]:10: warning: found possibly unsafe operator[], consider using at() instead [cppcoreguidelines-prefer-at-over-subscript-operator]
+// CHECK-MESSAGES: :[[@LINE-1]]:10: warning: found possibly unsafe operator[], consider using at() instead [cppcoreguidelines-pro-bounds-avoid-unchecked-container-accesses]
int e(int Ind) {
return a[Ind];
- // CHECK-MESSAGES: :[[@LINE-1]]:10: warning: found possibly unsafe operator[], consider using at() instead [cppcoreguidelines-prefer-at-over-subscript-operator]
+ // CHECK-MESSAGES: :[[@LINE-1]]:10: warning: found possibly unsafe operator[], consider using at() instead [cppcoreguidelines-pro-bounds-avoid-unchecked-container-accesses]
}
auto f = (&a)->operator[](1);
-// CHECK-MESSAGES: :[[@LINE-1]]:10: warning: found possibly unsafe operator[], consider using at() instead [cppcoreguidelines-prefer-at-over-subscript-operator]
+// CHECK-MESSAGES: :[[@LINE-1]]:10: warning: found possibly unsafe operator[], consider using at() instead [cppcoreguidelines-pro-bounds-avoid-unchecked-container-accesses]
auto g = a.at(0);
@@ -102,16 +102,16 @@ auto m = n[0];
SubClass Sub;
auto r = Sub[0];
-// CHECK-MESSAGES: :[[@LINE-1]]:10: warning: found possibly unsafe operator[], consider using at() instead [cppcoreguidelines-prefer-at-over-subscript-operator]
+// CHECK-MESSAGES: :[[@LINE-1]]:10: warning: found possibly unsafe operator[], consider using at() instead [cppcoreguidelines-pro-bounds-avoid-unchecked-container-accesses]
typedef std::array<int, 3> ar;
ar BehindDef;
auto u = BehindDef[0];
-// CHECK-MESSAGES: :[[@LINE-1]]:10: warning: found possibly unsafe operator[], consider using at() instead [cppcoreguidelines-prefer-at-over-subscript-operator]
+// CHECK-MESSAGES: :[[@LINE-1]]:10: warning: found possibly unsafe operator[], consider using at() instead [cppcoreguidelines-pro-bounds-avoid-unchecked-container-accesses]
template<typename T> int TestTemplate(T t){
return t[0];
- // CHECK-MESSAGES: :[[@LINE-1]]:10: warning: found possibly unsafe operator[], consider using at() instead [cppcoreguidelines-prefer-at-over-subscript-operator]
+ // CHECK-MESSAGES: :[[@LINE-1]]:10: warning: found possibly unsafe operator[], consider using at() instead [cppcoreguidelines-pro-bounds-avoid-unchecked-container-accesses]
}
@@ -133,10 +133,10 @@ auto y = TestMap[0];
#define OBJECT_BEHIND_MACRO a
auto m1 = SUBSCRIPT_BEHIND_MARCO(0);
-// CHECK-MESSAGES: :[[@LINE-1]]:11: warning: found possibly unsafe operator[], consider using at() instead [cppcoreguidelines-prefer-at-over-subscript-operator]
+// CHECK-MESSAGES: :[[@LINE-1]]:11: warning: found possibly unsafe operator[], consider using at() instead [cppcoreguidelines-pro-bounds-avoid-unchecked-container-accesses]
auto m2 = a[ARG_BEHIND_MACRO];
-// CHECK-MESSAGES: :[[@LINE-1]]:11: warning: found possibly unsafe operator[], consider using at() instead [cppcoreguidelines-prefer-at-over-subscript-operator]
+// CHECK-MESSAGES: :[[@LINE-1]]:11: warning: found possibly unsafe operator[], consider using at() instead [cppcoreguidelines-pro-bounds-avoid-unchecked-container-accesses]
auto m3 = OBJECT_BEHIND_MACRO[0];
-// CHECK-MESSAGES: :[[@LINE-1]]:11: warning: found possibly unsafe operator[], consider using at() instead [cppcoreguidelines-prefer-at-over-subscript-operator]
+// CHECK-MESSAGES: :[[@LINE-1]]:11: warning: found possibly unsafe operator[], consider using at() instead [cppcoreguidelines-pro-bounds-avoid-unchecked-container-accesses]
>From 7f37fbe1141a45e5d40093be13c84395519bdf91 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Paul=20Heidekr=C3=BCger?= <paul.heidekrueger at tum.de>
Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2024 10:44:39 +0200
Subject: [PATCH 19/48] Remove extra comment
Co-authored-by: Manuel Pietsch <manuelpietsch at outlook.de>
---
.../cppcoreguidelines/ProBoundsAvoidUncheckedContainerAccesses.h | 1 -
1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/clang-tools-extra/clang-tidy/cppcoreguidelines/ProBoundsAvoidUncheckedContainerAccesses.h b/clang-tools-extra/clang-tidy/cppcoreguidelines/ProBoundsAvoidUncheckedContainerAccesses.h
index 33abbef5e82437..8fdfd5e9eb518e 100644
--- a/clang-tools-extra/clang-tidy/cppcoreguidelines/ProBoundsAvoidUncheckedContainerAccesses.h
+++ b/clang-tools-extra/clang-tidy/cppcoreguidelines/ProBoundsAvoidUncheckedContainerAccesses.h
@@ -1,5 +1,4 @@
//===--- ProBoundsAvoidUncheckedContainerAccesses.h - clang-tidy *- C++ -*-===//
-//===--- PreferMemberInitializerCheck.h - clang-tidy ------------*- C++ -*-===//
//
// Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM Exceptions.
// See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information.
>From 6709a4d593d0b450b2616e2f02960805dcf8ce1c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Paul=20Heidekr=C3=BCger?= <paul.heidekrueger at tum.de>
Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2024 10:52:42 +0200
Subject: [PATCH 20/48] Mention bounds safety profile explicitly
Co-authored-by: Manuel Pietsch <manuelpietsch at outlook.de>
---
.../pro-bounds-avoid-unchecked-container-accesses.rst | 4 +++-
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/clang-tools-extra/docs/clang-tidy/checks/cppcoreguidelines/pro-bounds-avoid-unchecked-container-accesses.rst b/clang-tools-extra/docs/clang-tidy/checks/cppcoreguidelines/pro-bounds-avoid-unchecked-container-accesses.rst
index 616882738653d0..f39c5171110a01 100644
--- a/clang-tools-extra/docs/clang-tidy/checks/cppcoreguidelines/pro-bounds-avoid-unchecked-container-accesses.rst
+++ b/clang-tools-extra/docs/clang-tidy/checks/cppcoreguidelines/pro-bounds-avoid-unchecked-container-accesses.rst
@@ -35,4 +35,6 @@ Options
This check enforces part of the `SL.con.3
<https://isocpp.github.io/CppCoreGuidelines/CppCoreGuidelines#slcon3-avoid-bounds-errors>`
-guideline.
+guideline and is part of the `Bounds Safety (Bounds 4)
+<https://isocpp.github.io/CppCoreGuidelines/CppCoreGuidelines#Pro-bounds-arrayindex>` profile
+profile from the C++ Core Guidelines.
>From c7be533ca6de97e7997710908a9eecef7ca65d12 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Paul=20Heidekr=C3=BCger?= <paul.heidekrueger at tum.de>
Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2024 10:55:53 +0200
Subject: [PATCH 21/48] Move paragraph about which rule/profile is being
implemented above "Options"
Co-authored-by: Manuel Pietsch <manuelpietsch at outlook.de>
---
...pro-bounds-avoid-unchecked-container-accesses.rst | 12 ++++++------
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/clang-tools-extra/docs/clang-tidy/checks/cppcoreguidelines/pro-bounds-avoid-unchecked-container-accesses.rst b/clang-tools-extra/docs/clang-tidy/checks/cppcoreguidelines/pro-bounds-avoid-unchecked-container-accesses.rst
index f39c5171110a01..b62ec4fc7b6b5d 100644
--- a/clang-tools-extra/docs/clang-tidy/checks/cppcoreguidelines/pro-bounds-avoid-unchecked-container-accesses.rst
+++ b/clang-tools-extra/docs/clang-tidy/checks/cppcoreguidelines/pro-bounds-avoid-unchecked-container-accesses.rst
@@ -25,6 +25,12 @@ The classes ``std::map``, ``std::unordered_map`` and ``std::flat_map`` are
excluded from this check, because for them the subscript operator has a defined
behaviour when a key does not exist (inserting a new element).
+This check enforces part of the `SL.con.3
+<https://isocpp.github.io/CppCoreGuidelines/CppCoreGuidelines#slcon3-avoid-bounds-errors>`
+guideline and is part of the `Bounds Safety (Bounds 4)
+<https://isocpp.github.io/CppCoreGuidelines/CppCoreGuidelines#Pro-bounds-arrayindex>` profile
+profile from the C++ Core Guidelines.
+
Options
-------
@@ -32,9 +38,3 @@ Options
Semicolon-delimited list of class names that should additionally be
excluded from this check. By default empty.
-
-This check enforces part of the `SL.con.3
-<https://isocpp.github.io/CppCoreGuidelines/CppCoreGuidelines#slcon3-avoid-bounds-errors>`
-guideline and is part of the `Bounds Safety (Bounds 4)
-<https://isocpp.github.io/CppCoreGuidelines/CppCoreGuidelines#Pro-bounds-arrayindex>` profile
-profile from the C++ Core Guidelines.
>From 727418c6726b75d843fe93acbd5077614bd8fe0c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Paul=20Heidekr=C3=BCger?= <paul.heidekrueger at tum.de>
Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2024 11:09:05 +0200
Subject: [PATCH 22/48] Rename variables related to class exclusion mechanism
Co-authored-by: Manuel Pietsch <manuelpietsch at outlook.de>
---
...oBoundsAvoidUncheckedContainerAccesses.cpp | 26 ++++++++++---------
...ProBoundsAvoidUncheckedContainerAccesses.h | 2 +-
2 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
diff --git a/clang-tools-extra/clang-tidy/cppcoreguidelines/ProBoundsAvoidUncheckedContainerAccesses.cpp b/clang-tools-extra/clang-tidy/cppcoreguidelines/ProBoundsAvoidUncheckedContainerAccesses.cpp
index 19a52d0e565fa4..b68583a77ac7f6 100644
--- a/clang-tools-extra/clang-tidy/cppcoreguidelines/ProBoundsAvoidUncheckedContainerAccesses.cpp
+++ b/clang-tools-extra/clang-tidy/cppcoreguidelines/ProBoundsAvoidUncheckedContainerAccesses.cpp
@@ -17,7 +17,7 @@ using namespace clang::ast_matchers;
namespace clang::tidy::cppcoreguidelines {
-static constexpr std::array<llvm::StringRef, 3> DefaultExclusions = {
+static constexpr std::array<llvm::StringRef, 3> SubscriptDefaultExclusions = {
llvm::StringRef("::std::map"), llvm::StringRef("::std::unordered_map"),
llvm::StringRef("::std::flat_map")};
@@ -26,29 +26,30 @@ ProBoundsAvoidUncheckedContainerAccesses::
ClangTidyContext *Context)
: ClangTidyCheck(Name, Context) {
- ExcludedClasses = clang::tidy::utils::options::parseStringList(
+ SubscriptExcludedClasses = clang::tidy::utils::options::parseStringList(
Options.get("ExcludeClasses", ""));
- ExcludedClasses.insert(ExcludedClasses.end(), DefaultExclusions.begin(),
- DefaultExclusions.end());
+ SubscriptExcludedClasses.insert(SubscriptExcludedClasses.end(),
+ SubscriptDefaultExclusions.begin(),
+ SubscriptDefaultExclusions.end());
}
void ProBoundsAvoidUncheckedContainerAccesses::storeOptions(
ClangTidyOptions::OptionMap &Opts) {
- if (ExcludedClasses.size() == DefaultExclusions.size()) {
+ if (SubscriptExcludedClasses.size() == SubscriptDefaultExclusions.size()) {
Options.store(Opts, "ExcludeClasses", "");
return;
}
// Sum up the sizes of the defaults ( + semicolons), so we can remove them
// from the saved options
- size_t DefaultsStringLength =
- std::transform_reduce(DefaultExclusions.begin(), DefaultExclusions.end(),
- DefaultExclusions.size(), std::plus<>(),
- [](llvm::StringRef Name) { return Name.size(); });
+ size_t DefaultsStringLength = std::transform_reduce(
+ SubscriptDefaultExclusions.begin(), SubscriptDefaultExclusions.end(),
+ SubscriptDefaultExclusions.size(), std::plus<>(),
+ [](llvm::StringRef Name) { return Name.size(); });
- std::string Serialized =
- clang::tidy::utils::options::serializeStringList(ExcludedClasses);
+ std::string Serialized = clang::tidy::utils::options::serializeStringList(
+ SubscriptExcludedClasses);
Options.store(Opts, "ExcludeClasses",
Serialized.substr(0, Serialized.size() - DefaultsStringLength));
@@ -94,7 +95,8 @@ void ProBoundsAvoidUncheckedContainerAccesses::registerMatchers(
cxxMethodDecl(hasOverloadedOperatorName("[]")).bind("operator")),
callee(cxxMethodDecl(
ofClass(cxxRecordDecl(hasMethod(hasName("at"))).bind("parent")),
- unless(matchers::matchesAnyListedName(ExcludedClasses)))))
+ unless(
+ matchers::matchesAnyListedName(SubscriptExcludedClasses)))))
.bind("caller"),
this);
}
diff --git a/clang-tools-extra/clang-tidy/cppcoreguidelines/ProBoundsAvoidUncheckedContainerAccesses.h b/clang-tools-extra/clang-tidy/cppcoreguidelines/ProBoundsAvoidUncheckedContainerAccesses.h
index 8fdfd5e9eb518e..3776869e6d42a2 100644
--- a/clang-tools-extra/clang-tidy/cppcoreguidelines/ProBoundsAvoidUncheckedContainerAccesses.h
+++ b/clang-tools-extra/clang-tidy/cppcoreguidelines/ProBoundsAvoidUncheckedContainerAccesses.h
@@ -32,7 +32,7 @@ class ProBoundsAvoidUncheckedContainerAccesses : public ClangTidyCheck {
private:
// A list of class names that are excluded from the warning
- std::vector<llvm::StringRef> ExcludedClasses;
+ std::vector<llvm::StringRef> SubscriptExcludedClasses;
};
} // namespace clang::tidy::cppcoreguidelines
>From ab56c3c90de5693ba5887df558fb4ad3076dc982 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Paul=20Heidekr=C3=BCger?= <paul.heidekrueger at tum.de>
Date: Sun, 30 Jun 2024 14:57:07 +0200
Subject: [PATCH 23/48] Remove redundant nullptr cast
Co-authored-by: Manuel Pietsch <manuelpietsch at outlook.de>
---
.../ProBoundsAvoidUncheckedContainerAccesses.cpp | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/clang-tools-extra/clang-tidy/cppcoreguidelines/ProBoundsAvoidUncheckedContainerAccesses.cpp b/clang-tools-extra/clang-tidy/cppcoreguidelines/ProBoundsAvoidUncheckedContainerAccesses.cpp
index b68583a77ac7f6..560ccf3c7ca867 100644
--- a/clang-tools-extra/clang-tidy/cppcoreguidelines/ProBoundsAvoidUncheckedContainerAccesses.cpp
+++ b/clang-tools-extra/clang-tidy/cppcoreguidelines/ProBoundsAvoidUncheckedContainerAccesses.cpp
@@ -82,7 +82,7 @@ const CXXMethodDecl *findAlternative(const CXXRecordDecl *MatchedParent,
return Method;
}
- return static_cast<CXXMethodDecl *>(nullptr);
+ return nullptr;
}
void ProBoundsAvoidUncheckedContainerAccesses::registerMatchers(
>From 06b69f0b1da53e444efe20556a5fdeefcc441b90 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Paul=20Heidekr=C3=BCger?= <paul.heidekrueger at tum.de>
Date: Sun, 30 Jun 2024 15:04:00 +0200
Subject: [PATCH 24/48] Refactor the check's matcher as per 5chmidti's
suggestion
Co-authored-by: Manuel Pietsch <manuelpietsch at outlook.de>
---
...oBoundsAvoidUncheckedContainerAccesses.cpp | 24 +++++++++----------
1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
diff --git a/clang-tools-extra/clang-tidy/cppcoreguidelines/ProBoundsAvoidUncheckedContainerAccesses.cpp b/clang-tools-extra/clang-tidy/cppcoreguidelines/ProBoundsAvoidUncheckedContainerAccesses.cpp
index 560ccf3c7ca867..054aa852ca6645 100644
--- a/clang-tools-extra/clang-tidy/cppcoreguidelines/ProBoundsAvoidUncheckedContainerAccesses.cpp
+++ b/clang-tools-extra/clang-tidy/cppcoreguidelines/ProBoundsAvoidUncheckedContainerAccesses.cpp
@@ -55,9 +55,9 @@ void ProBoundsAvoidUncheckedContainerAccesses::storeOptions(
Serialized.substr(0, Serialized.size() - DefaultsStringLength));
}
-const CXXMethodDecl *findAlternative(const CXXRecordDecl *MatchedParent,
- const CXXMethodDecl *MatchedOperator) {
- for (const CXXMethodDecl *Method : MatchedParent->methods()) {
+const CXXMethodDecl *findAlternative(const CXXMethodDecl *MatchedOperator) {
+ const CXXRecordDecl *Parent = MatchedOperator->getParent();
+ for (const CXXMethodDecl *Method : Parent->methods()) {
const bool CorrectName = Method->getNameInfo().getAsString() == "at";
if (!CorrectName)
continue;
@@ -90,13 +90,13 @@ void ProBoundsAvoidUncheckedContainerAccesses::registerMatchers(
// Need a callExpr here to match CXXOperatorCallExpr ``(&a)->operator[](0)``
// and CXXMemberCallExpr ``a[0]``.
Finder->addMatcher(
- callExpr(
- callee(
- cxxMethodDecl(hasOverloadedOperatorName("[]")).bind("operator")),
- callee(cxxMethodDecl(
- ofClass(cxxRecordDecl(hasMethod(hasName("at"))).bind("parent")),
- unless(
- matchers::matchesAnyListedName(SubscriptExcludedClasses)))))
+ mapAnyOf(cxxOperatorCallExpr, cxxMemberCallExpr)
+ .with(callee(cxxMethodDecl(hasOverloadedOperatorName("[]"),
+ ofClass(cxxRecordDecl(hasMethod(
+ cxxMethodDecl(hasName("at"))))),
+ unless(matchers::matchesAnyListedName(
+ SubscriptExcludedClasses)))
+ .bind("operator")))
.bind("caller"),
this);
}
@@ -106,10 +106,8 @@ void ProBoundsAvoidUncheckedContainerAccesses::check(
const auto *MatchedExpr = Result.Nodes.getNodeAs<CallExpr>("caller");
const auto *MatchedOperator =
Result.Nodes.getNodeAs<CXXMethodDecl>("operator");
- const auto *MatchedParent = Result.Nodes.getNodeAs<CXXRecordDecl>("parent");
- const CXXMethodDecl *Alternative =
- findAlternative(MatchedParent, MatchedOperator);
+ const CXXMethodDecl *Alternative = findAlternative(MatchedOperator);
if (!Alternative)
return;
>From fa3530bf13d74935c417334e3833ee5c75e6a8e9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Paul=20Heidekr=C3=BCger?= <paul.heidekrueger at tum.de>
Date: Sun, 30 Jun 2024 15:15:10 +0200
Subject: [PATCH 25/48] Check that alternative is accessible in
findAlternative() as per @5chmidti's and @PiotrZSL's suggestions
Co-authored-by: Manuel Pietsch <manuelpietsch at outlook.de>
---
.../ProBoundsAvoidUncheckedContainerAccesses.cpp | 15 +++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 15 insertions(+)
diff --git a/clang-tools-extra/clang-tidy/cppcoreguidelines/ProBoundsAvoidUncheckedContainerAccesses.cpp b/clang-tools-extra/clang-tidy/cppcoreguidelines/ProBoundsAvoidUncheckedContainerAccesses.cpp
index 054aa852ca6645..d48b19bb36711e 100644
--- a/clang-tools-extra/clang-tidy/cppcoreguidelines/ProBoundsAvoidUncheckedContainerAccesses.cpp
+++ b/clang-tools-extra/clang-tidy/cppcoreguidelines/ProBoundsAvoidUncheckedContainerAccesses.cpp
@@ -57,7 +57,22 @@ void ProBoundsAvoidUncheckedContainerAccesses::storeOptions(
const CXXMethodDecl *findAlternative(const CXXMethodDecl *MatchedOperator) {
const CXXRecordDecl *Parent = MatchedOperator->getParent();
+ const QualType SubscriptThisObjType =
+ MatchedOperator->getFunctionObjectParameterReferenceType();
+
for (const CXXMethodDecl *Method : Parent->methods()) {
+ // Require 'Method' to be as accessible as 'MatchedOperator' or more
+ if (MatchedOperator->getAccess() < Method->getAccess())
+ continue;
+
+ if (MatchedOperator->isConst() != Method->isConst())
+ continue;
+
+ const QualType AtThisObjType =
+ Method->getFunctionObjectParameterReferenceType();
+ if (SubscriptThisObjType != AtThisObjType)
+ continue;
+
const bool CorrectName = Method->getNameInfo().getAsString() == "at";
if (!CorrectName)
continue;
>From f057feb46a3fb97f1cc93126ff8998ac31b72020 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Paul=20Heidekr=C3=BCger?= <paul.heidekrueger at tum.de>
Date: Sun, 30 Jun 2024 15:28:10 +0200
Subject: [PATCH 26/48] Use upticks when diagnostic messages refer to code
Co-authored-by: Manuel Pietsch <manuelpietsch at outlook.de>
---
...oBoundsAvoidUncheckedContainerAccesses.cpp | 4 ++--
...nds-avoid-unchecked-container-accesses.cpp | 22 +++++++++----------
2 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
diff --git a/clang-tools-extra/clang-tidy/cppcoreguidelines/ProBoundsAvoidUncheckedContainerAccesses.cpp b/clang-tools-extra/clang-tidy/cppcoreguidelines/ProBoundsAvoidUncheckedContainerAccesses.cpp
index d48b19bb36711e..8998cbfc1aeb2e 100644
--- a/clang-tools-extra/clang-tidy/cppcoreguidelines/ProBoundsAvoidUncheckedContainerAccesses.cpp
+++ b/clang-tools-extra/clang-tidy/cppcoreguidelines/ProBoundsAvoidUncheckedContainerAccesses.cpp
@@ -127,9 +127,9 @@ void ProBoundsAvoidUncheckedContainerAccesses::check(
return;
diag(MatchedExpr->getBeginLoc(),
- "found possibly unsafe operator[], consider using at() instead")
+ "found possibly unsafe 'operator[]', consider using 'at()' instead")
<< MatchedExpr->getSourceRange();
- diag(Alternative->getBeginLoc(), "alternative at() defined here",
+ diag(Alternative->getBeginLoc(), "alternative 'at()' defined here",
DiagnosticIDs::Note)
<< Alternative->getSourceRange();
}
diff --git a/clang-tools-extra/test/clang-tidy/checkers/cppcoreguidelines/pro-bounds-avoid-unchecked-container-accesses.cpp b/clang-tools-extra/test/clang-tidy/checkers/cppcoreguidelines/pro-bounds-avoid-unchecked-container-accesses.cpp
index 1a7a7fba7d8a27..9801dbb94ae274 100644
--- a/clang-tools-extra/test/clang-tidy/checkers/cppcoreguidelines/pro-bounds-avoid-unchecked-container-accesses.cpp
+++ b/clang-tools-extra/test/clang-tidy/checkers/cppcoreguidelines/pro-bounds-avoid-unchecked-container-accesses.cpp
@@ -72,22 +72,22 @@ class ExcludedClass2 {
std::array<int, 3> a;
auto b = a[0];
-// CHECK-MESSAGES: :[[@LINE-1]]:10: warning: found possibly unsafe operator[], consider using at() instead [cppcoreguidelines-pro-bounds-avoid-unchecked-container-accesses]
+// CHECK-MESSAGES: :[[@LINE-1]]:10: warning: found possibly unsafe 'operator[]', consider using 'at()' instead [cppcoreguidelines-pro-bounds-avoid-unchecked-container-accesses]
auto c = a[1+1];
-// CHECK-MESSAGES: :[[@LINE-1]]:10: warning: found possibly unsafe operator[], consider using at() instead [cppcoreguidelines-pro-bounds-avoid-unchecked-container-accesses]
+// CHECK-MESSAGES: :[[@LINE-1]]:10: warning: found possibly unsafe 'operator[]', consider using 'at()' instead [cppcoreguidelines-pro-bounds-avoid-unchecked-container-accesses]
constexpr int Index = 1;
auto d = a[Index];
-// CHECK-MESSAGES: :[[@LINE-1]]:10: warning: found possibly unsafe operator[], consider using at() instead [cppcoreguidelines-pro-bounds-avoid-unchecked-container-accesses]
+// CHECK-MESSAGES: :[[@LINE-1]]:10: warning: found possibly unsafe 'operator[]', consider using 'at()' instead [cppcoreguidelines-pro-bounds-avoid-unchecked-container-accesses]
int e(int Ind) {
return a[Ind];
- // CHECK-MESSAGES: :[[@LINE-1]]:10: warning: found possibly unsafe operator[], consider using at() instead [cppcoreguidelines-pro-bounds-avoid-unchecked-container-accesses]
+ // CHECK-MESSAGES: :[[@LINE-1]]:10: warning: found possibly unsafe 'operator[]', consider using 'at()' instead [cppcoreguidelines-pro-bounds-avoid-unchecked-container-accesses]
}
auto f = (&a)->operator[](1);
-// CHECK-MESSAGES: :[[@LINE-1]]:10: warning: found possibly unsafe operator[], consider using at() instead [cppcoreguidelines-pro-bounds-avoid-unchecked-container-accesses]
+// CHECK-MESSAGES: :[[@LINE-1]]:10: warning: found possibly unsafe 'operator[]', consider using 'at()' instead [cppcoreguidelines-pro-bounds-avoid-unchecked-container-accesses]
auto g = a.at(0);
@@ -102,16 +102,16 @@ auto m = n[0];
SubClass Sub;
auto r = Sub[0];
-// CHECK-MESSAGES: :[[@LINE-1]]:10: warning: found possibly unsafe operator[], consider using at() instead [cppcoreguidelines-pro-bounds-avoid-unchecked-container-accesses]
+// CHECK-MESSAGES: :[[@LINE-1]]:10: warning: found possibly unsafe 'operator[]', consider using 'at()' instead [cppcoreguidelines-pro-bounds-avoid-unchecked-container-accesses]
typedef std::array<int, 3> ar;
ar BehindDef;
auto u = BehindDef[0];
-// CHECK-MESSAGES: :[[@LINE-1]]:10: warning: found possibly unsafe operator[], consider using at() instead [cppcoreguidelines-pro-bounds-avoid-unchecked-container-accesses]
+// CHECK-MESSAGES: :[[@LINE-1]]:10: warning: found possibly unsafe 'operator[]', consider using 'at()' instead [cppcoreguidelines-pro-bounds-avoid-unchecked-container-accesses]
template<typename T> int TestTemplate(T t){
return t[0];
- // CHECK-MESSAGES: :[[@LINE-1]]:10: warning: found possibly unsafe operator[], consider using at() instead [cppcoreguidelines-pro-bounds-avoid-unchecked-container-accesses]
+ // CHECK-MESSAGES: :[[@LINE-1]]:10: warning: found possibly unsafe 'operator[]', consider using 'at()' instead [cppcoreguidelines-pro-bounds-avoid-unchecked-container-accesses]
}
@@ -133,10 +133,10 @@ auto y = TestMap[0];
#define OBJECT_BEHIND_MACRO a
auto m1 = SUBSCRIPT_BEHIND_MARCO(0);
-// CHECK-MESSAGES: :[[@LINE-1]]:11: warning: found possibly unsafe operator[], consider using at() instead [cppcoreguidelines-pro-bounds-avoid-unchecked-container-accesses]
+// CHECK-MESSAGES: :[[@LINE-1]]:11: warning: found possibly unsafe 'operator[]', consider using 'at()' instead [cppcoreguidelines-pro-bounds-avoid-unchecked-container-accesses]
auto m2 = a[ARG_BEHIND_MACRO];
-// CHECK-MESSAGES: :[[@LINE-1]]:11: warning: found possibly unsafe operator[], consider using at() instead [cppcoreguidelines-pro-bounds-avoid-unchecked-container-accesses]
+// CHECK-MESSAGES: :[[@LINE-1]]:11: warning: found possibly unsafe 'operator[]', consider using 'at()' instead [cppcoreguidelines-pro-bounds-avoid-unchecked-container-accesses]
auto m3 = OBJECT_BEHIND_MACRO[0];
-// CHECK-MESSAGES: :[[@LINE-1]]:11: warning: found possibly unsafe operator[], consider using at() instead [cppcoreguidelines-pro-bounds-avoid-unchecked-container-accesses]
+// CHECK-MESSAGES: :[[@LINE-1]]:11: warning: found possibly unsafe 'operator[]', consider using 'at()' instead [cppcoreguidelines-pro-bounds-avoid-unchecked-container-accesses]
>From 06980163113eedb4000b13b5ae003c8d551be29c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Paul=20Heidekr=C3=BCger?= <paul.heidekrueger at tum.de>
Date: Sun, 30 Jun 2024 15:31:24 +0200
Subject: [PATCH 27/48] Make findAlternative() static
Co-authored-by: Manuel Pietsch <manuelpietsch at outlook.de>
---
.../ProBoundsAvoidUncheckedContainerAccesses.cpp | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/clang-tools-extra/clang-tidy/cppcoreguidelines/ProBoundsAvoidUncheckedContainerAccesses.cpp b/clang-tools-extra/clang-tidy/cppcoreguidelines/ProBoundsAvoidUncheckedContainerAccesses.cpp
index 8998cbfc1aeb2e..324a36296aa778 100644
--- a/clang-tools-extra/clang-tidy/cppcoreguidelines/ProBoundsAvoidUncheckedContainerAccesses.cpp
+++ b/clang-tools-extra/clang-tidy/cppcoreguidelines/ProBoundsAvoidUncheckedContainerAccesses.cpp
@@ -55,7 +55,8 @@ void ProBoundsAvoidUncheckedContainerAccesses::storeOptions(
Serialized.substr(0, Serialized.size() - DefaultsStringLength));
}
-const CXXMethodDecl *findAlternative(const CXXMethodDecl *MatchedOperator) {
+static const CXXMethodDecl *
+findAlternative(const CXXMethodDecl *MatchedOperator) {
const CXXRecordDecl *Parent = MatchedOperator->getParent();
const QualType SubscriptThisObjType =
MatchedOperator->getFunctionObjectParameterReferenceType();
>From ae85cdf1d8aceb82f4e50b9e17e8f29bd6f9a502 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Paul=20Heidekr=C3=BCger?= <paul.heidekrueger at tum.de>
Date: Sun, 30 Jun 2024 15:33:49 +0200
Subject: [PATCH 28/48] Move MatchedExpr definition closer to where it's first
used in ProBoundsAvoidUncheckedContainerAccesses::check()
Co-authored-by: Manuel Pietsch <manuelpietsch at outlook.de>
---
.../ProBoundsAvoidUncheckedContainerAccesses.cpp | 5 +++--
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/clang-tools-extra/clang-tidy/cppcoreguidelines/ProBoundsAvoidUncheckedContainerAccesses.cpp b/clang-tools-extra/clang-tidy/cppcoreguidelines/ProBoundsAvoidUncheckedContainerAccesses.cpp
index 324a36296aa778..f3dff0769e994e 100644
--- a/clang-tools-extra/clang-tidy/cppcoreguidelines/ProBoundsAvoidUncheckedContainerAccesses.cpp
+++ b/clang-tools-extra/clang-tidy/cppcoreguidelines/ProBoundsAvoidUncheckedContainerAccesses.cpp
@@ -119,14 +119,15 @@ void ProBoundsAvoidUncheckedContainerAccesses::registerMatchers(
void ProBoundsAvoidUncheckedContainerAccesses::check(
const MatchFinder::MatchResult &Result) {
- const auto *MatchedExpr = Result.Nodes.getNodeAs<CallExpr>("caller");
const auto *MatchedOperator =
Result.Nodes.getNodeAs<CXXMethodDecl>("operator");
-
const CXXMethodDecl *Alternative = findAlternative(MatchedOperator);
+
if (!Alternative)
return;
+ const auto *MatchedExpr = Result.Nodes.getNodeAs<CallExpr>("caller");
+
diag(MatchedExpr->getBeginLoc(),
"found possibly unsafe 'operator[]', consider using 'at()' instead")
<< MatchedExpr->getSourceRange();
>From d6182981b08fc8742d3005956ba7058ad121a325 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Paul=20Heidekr=C3=BCger?= <paul.heidekrueger at tum.de>
Date: Sun, 30 Jun 2024 15:37:57 +0200
Subject: [PATCH 29/48] Synchronise comment in header file with ReleaseNotes
and check description
Co-authored-by: Manuel Pietsch <manuelpietsch at outlook.de>
---
.../ProBoundsAvoidUncheckedContainerAccesses.h | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/clang-tools-extra/clang-tidy/cppcoreguidelines/ProBoundsAvoidUncheckedContainerAccesses.h b/clang-tools-extra/clang-tidy/cppcoreguidelines/ProBoundsAvoidUncheckedContainerAccesses.h
index 3776869e6d42a2..a4770384db0ab2 100644
--- a/clang-tools-extra/clang-tidy/cppcoreguidelines/ProBoundsAvoidUncheckedContainerAccesses.h
+++ b/clang-tools-extra/clang-tidy/cppcoreguidelines/ProBoundsAvoidUncheckedContainerAccesses.h
@@ -13,7 +13,7 @@
namespace clang::tidy::cppcoreguidelines {
-/// Enforce CPP core guidelines SL.con.3
+/// Flags the unsafe ``operator[]`` and suggests replacing it with ``at()``.
///
/// See
/// https://isocpp.github.io/CppCoreGuidelines/CppCoreGuidelines#slcon3-avoid-bounds-errors
>From 7865032d494f1c988daac99fa5c8c41fbf8c1851 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Paul=20Heidekr=C3=BCger?= <paul.heidekrueger at tum.de>
Date: Mon, 8 Jul 2024 11:05:49 +0200
Subject: [PATCH 30/48] Reword reasoning re: class exclusion in
pro-bounds-avoid-unchecked-container-accesses.rst
Co-authored-by: Manuel Pietsch <manuelpietsch at outlook.de>
---
.../pro-bounds-avoid-unchecked-container-accesses.rst | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/clang-tools-extra/docs/clang-tidy/checks/cppcoreguidelines/pro-bounds-avoid-unchecked-container-accesses.rst b/clang-tools-extra/docs/clang-tidy/checks/cppcoreguidelines/pro-bounds-avoid-unchecked-container-accesses.rst
index b62ec4fc7b6b5d..a2ba12100cbf77 100644
--- a/clang-tools-extra/docs/clang-tidy/checks/cppcoreguidelines/pro-bounds-avoid-unchecked-container-accesses.rst
+++ b/clang-tools-extra/docs/clang-tidy/checks/cppcoreguidelines/pro-bounds-avoid-unchecked-container-accesses.rst
@@ -22,7 +22,7 @@ will generate a warning but
will not.
The classes ``std::map``, ``std::unordered_map`` and ``std::flat_map`` are
-excluded from this check, because for them the subscript operator has a defined
+excluded from this check, because their subscript operator has a defined
behaviour when a key does not exist (inserting a new element).
This check enforces part of the `SL.con.3
>From f0d33c42b91b92d4131897a4321696f3c89196cf Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Paul=20Heidekr=C3=BCger?= <paul.heidekrueger at tum.de>
Date: Mon, 8 Jul 2024 11:15:32 +0200
Subject: [PATCH 31/48] Replace array with container
inpro-bounds-avoid-unchecked-container-accesses.rst
Co-authored-by: Manuel Pietsch <manuelpietsch at outlook.de>
---
.../pro-bounds-avoid-unchecked-container-accesses.rst | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/clang-tools-extra/docs/clang-tidy/checks/cppcoreguidelines/pro-bounds-avoid-unchecked-container-accesses.rst b/clang-tools-extra/docs/clang-tidy/checks/cppcoreguidelines/pro-bounds-avoid-unchecked-container-accesses.rst
index a2ba12100cbf77..1221c38f238838 100644
--- a/clang-tools-extra/docs/clang-tidy/checks/cppcoreguidelines/pro-bounds-avoid-unchecked-container-accesses.rst
+++ b/clang-tools-extra/docs/clang-tidy/checks/cppcoreguidelines/pro-bounds-avoid-unchecked-container-accesses.rst
@@ -9,7 +9,7 @@ For example the code
.. code-block:: c++
- std::array<int, 3> a;
+ std::vector<int> a;
int b = a[4];
will generate a warning but
>From c59c2d92466b253ee32b65571627271f7a0d1b61 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Paul=20Heidekr=C3=BCger?= <paul.heidekrueger at tum.de>
Date: Mon, 8 Jul 2024 11:17:39 +0200
Subject: [PATCH 32/48] Update unique_ptr example in
pro-bounds-avoid-unchecked-container-accesses.rst
Co-authored-by: Manuel Pietsch <manuelpietsch at outlook.de>
---
.../pro-bounds-avoid-unchecked-container-accesses.rst | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/clang-tools-extra/docs/clang-tidy/checks/cppcoreguidelines/pro-bounds-avoid-unchecked-container-accesses.rst b/clang-tools-extra/docs/clang-tidy/checks/cppcoreguidelines/pro-bounds-avoid-unchecked-container-accesses.rst
index 1221c38f238838..4bc91adb2ee62a 100644
--- a/clang-tools-extra/docs/clang-tidy/checks/cppcoreguidelines/pro-bounds-avoid-unchecked-container-accesses.rst
+++ b/clang-tools-extra/docs/clang-tidy/checks/cppcoreguidelines/pro-bounds-avoid-unchecked-container-accesses.rst
@@ -16,7 +16,7 @@ will generate a warning but
.. code-block:: c++
- std::unique_ptr<int> a;
+ std::unique_ptr<vector> a;
int b = a[0];
will not.
>From ac3886426b29c49627afbab788a656f6dc5897af Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Paul=20Heidekr=C3=BCger?= <paul.heidekrueger at tum.de>
Date: Mon, 8 Jul 2024 12:15:00 +0200
Subject: [PATCH 33/48] Remove outdated comment in
ProBoundsAvoidUncheckedContainerAccess.cpp
Co-authored-by: Manuel Pietsch <manuelpietsch at outlook.de>
---
.../ProBoundsAvoidUncheckedContainerAccesses.cpp | 2 --
1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/clang-tools-extra/clang-tidy/cppcoreguidelines/ProBoundsAvoidUncheckedContainerAccesses.cpp b/clang-tools-extra/clang-tidy/cppcoreguidelines/ProBoundsAvoidUncheckedContainerAccesses.cpp
index f3dff0769e994e..81cb943082a687 100644
--- a/clang-tools-extra/clang-tidy/cppcoreguidelines/ProBoundsAvoidUncheckedContainerAccesses.cpp
+++ b/clang-tools-extra/clang-tidy/cppcoreguidelines/ProBoundsAvoidUncheckedContainerAccesses.cpp
@@ -103,8 +103,6 @@ findAlternative(const CXXMethodDecl *MatchedOperator) {
void ProBoundsAvoidUncheckedContainerAccesses::registerMatchers(
MatchFinder *Finder) {
- // Need a callExpr here to match CXXOperatorCallExpr ``(&a)->operator[](0)``
- // and CXXMemberCallExpr ``a[0]``.
Finder->addMatcher(
mapAnyOf(cxxOperatorCallExpr, cxxMemberCallExpr)
.with(callee(cxxMethodDecl(hasOverloadedOperatorName("[]"),
>From e26e47da7d8550b4ddc29ec54b70e21c60b1c240 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Paul=20Heidekr=C3=BCger?= <paul.heidekrueger at tum.de>
Date: Mon, 8 Jul 2024 12:21:27 +0200
Subject: [PATCH 34/48] Use TK_IgnoreUnlessSpelledInSource as traversal kind
Co-authored-by: Manuel Pietsch <manuelpietsch at outlook.de>
---
.../cppcoreguidelines/ProBoundsConstantArrayIndexCheck.h | 4 ++++
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
diff --git a/clang-tools-extra/clang-tidy/cppcoreguidelines/ProBoundsConstantArrayIndexCheck.h b/clang-tools-extra/clang-tidy/cppcoreguidelines/ProBoundsConstantArrayIndexCheck.h
index a583cc78b2c547..6034b1542108e1 100644
--- a/clang-tools-extra/clang-tidy/cppcoreguidelines/ProBoundsConstantArrayIndexCheck.h
+++ b/clang-tools-extra/clang-tidy/cppcoreguidelines/ProBoundsConstantArrayIndexCheck.h
@@ -32,6 +32,10 @@ class ProBoundsConstantArrayIndexCheck : public ClangTidyCheck {
Preprocessor *ModuleExpanderPP) override;
void registerMatchers(ast_matchers::MatchFinder *Finder) override;
void storeOptions(ClangTidyOptions::OptionMap &Opts) override;
+ std::optional<TraversalKind> getCheckTraversalKind() const override {
+ return TK_IgnoreUnlessSpelledInSource;
+ }
+
void check(const ast_matchers::MatchFinder::MatchResult &Result) override;
};
>From fae14c781f570796b3f614b97cdcb6b9b81a7287 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Paul=20Heidekr=C3=BCger?= <paul.heidekrueger at tum.de>
Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2024 13:30:42 +0200
Subject: [PATCH 35/48] Revert "Use TK_IgnoreUnlessSpelledInSource as traversal
kind"
This reverts commit ed2076750349881a2613816746fadd792212bb01.
Co-authored-by: Manuel Pietsch <manuelpietsch at outlook.de>
---
.../cppcoreguidelines/ProBoundsConstantArrayIndexCheck.h | 4 ----
1 file changed, 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/clang-tools-extra/clang-tidy/cppcoreguidelines/ProBoundsConstantArrayIndexCheck.h b/clang-tools-extra/clang-tidy/cppcoreguidelines/ProBoundsConstantArrayIndexCheck.h
index 6034b1542108e1..a583cc78b2c547 100644
--- a/clang-tools-extra/clang-tidy/cppcoreguidelines/ProBoundsConstantArrayIndexCheck.h
+++ b/clang-tools-extra/clang-tidy/cppcoreguidelines/ProBoundsConstantArrayIndexCheck.h
@@ -32,10 +32,6 @@ class ProBoundsConstantArrayIndexCheck : public ClangTidyCheck {
Preprocessor *ModuleExpanderPP) override;
void registerMatchers(ast_matchers::MatchFinder *Finder) override;
void storeOptions(ClangTidyOptions::OptionMap &Opts) override;
- std::optional<TraversalKind> getCheckTraversalKind() const override {
- return TK_IgnoreUnlessSpelledInSource;
- }
-
void check(const ast_matchers::MatchFinder::MatchResult &Result) override;
};
>From e993eef412ca8ab51c3037ffba523efe8961fdb7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Paul=20Heidekr=C3=BCger?= <paul.heidekrueger at tum.de>
Date: Fri, 2 Aug 2024 16:44:02 +0200
Subject: [PATCH 36/48] Add template test with std::map as an argument
Co-authored-by: Manuel Pietsch <manuelpietsch at outlook.de>
---
.../pro-bounds-avoid-unchecked-container-accesses.cpp | 9 ++++++---
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/clang-tools-extra/test/clang-tidy/checkers/cppcoreguidelines/pro-bounds-avoid-unchecked-container-accesses.cpp b/clang-tools-extra/test/clang-tidy/checkers/cppcoreguidelines/pro-bounds-avoid-unchecked-container-accesses.cpp
index 9801dbb94ae274..447b4d1bed195a 100644
--- a/clang-tools-extra/test/clang-tidy/checkers/cppcoreguidelines/pro-bounds-avoid-unchecked-container-accesses.cpp
+++ b/clang-tools-extra/test/clang-tidy/checkers/cppcoreguidelines/pro-bounds-avoid-unchecked-container-accesses.cpp
@@ -115,9 +115,15 @@ template<typename T> int TestTemplate(T t){
}
+
auto v = TestTemplate<>(a);
auto w = TestTemplate<>(p);
+std::map<int,int> TestMap;
+auto x = TestTemplate<>(TestMap);
+
+auto y = TestMap[0];
+
//explicitely excluded classes / struct / template
ExcludedClass1 E1;
auto x1 = E1[0];
@@ -125,9 +131,6 @@ auto x1 = E1[0];
ExcludedClass2 E2;
auto x2 = E1[0];
-std::map<int,int> TestMap;
-auto y = TestMap[0];
-
#define SUBSCRIPT_BEHIND_MARCO(x) a[x]
#define ARG_BEHIND_MACRO 0
#define OBJECT_BEHIND_MACRO a
>From d3195ad88ea66c7ee8cf036758419c5dd4b1acbe Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Paul=20Heidekr=C3=BCger?= <paul.heidekrueger at tum.de>
Date: Fri, 2 Aug 2024 16:53:35 +0200
Subject: [PATCH 37/48] Use getNameInfo().getSourceRange() instead of
getSourceRange() when printing the location of the alternative
Co-authored-by: Manuel Pietsch <manuelpietsch at outlook.de>
---
.../ProBoundsAvoidUncheckedContainerAccesses.cpp | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/clang-tools-extra/clang-tidy/cppcoreguidelines/ProBoundsAvoidUncheckedContainerAccesses.cpp b/clang-tools-extra/clang-tidy/cppcoreguidelines/ProBoundsAvoidUncheckedContainerAccesses.cpp
index 81cb943082a687..6435277a020f5a 100644
--- a/clang-tools-extra/clang-tidy/cppcoreguidelines/ProBoundsAvoidUncheckedContainerAccesses.cpp
+++ b/clang-tools-extra/clang-tidy/cppcoreguidelines/ProBoundsAvoidUncheckedContainerAccesses.cpp
@@ -131,7 +131,7 @@ void ProBoundsAvoidUncheckedContainerAccesses::check(
<< MatchedExpr->getSourceRange();
diag(Alternative->getBeginLoc(), "alternative 'at()' defined here",
DiagnosticIDs::Note)
- << Alternative->getSourceRange();
+ << Alternative->getNameInfo().getSourceRange();
}
} // namespace clang::tidy::cppcoreguidelines
>From ccdc988a700ad4505602addfeaae8a39e0ec09cb Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Paul=20Heidekr=C3=BCger?= <paul.heidekrueger at tum.de>
Date: Sat, 3 Aug 2024 22:04:25 +0200
Subject: [PATCH 38/48] Replace use of Method->getNameInfo().getAsString() with
Method->getName()
Co-authored-by: Manuel Pietsch <manuelpietsch at outlook.de>
---
.../ProBoundsAvoidUncheckedContainerAccesses.cpp | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/clang-tools-extra/clang-tidy/cppcoreguidelines/ProBoundsAvoidUncheckedContainerAccesses.cpp b/clang-tools-extra/clang-tidy/cppcoreguidelines/ProBoundsAvoidUncheckedContainerAccesses.cpp
index 6435277a020f5a..c0f1fbd7923758 100644
--- a/clang-tools-extra/clang-tidy/cppcoreguidelines/ProBoundsAvoidUncheckedContainerAccesses.cpp
+++ b/clang-tools-extra/clang-tidy/cppcoreguidelines/ProBoundsAvoidUncheckedContainerAccesses.cpp
@@ -74,8 +74,8 @@ findAlternative(const CXXMethodDecl *MatchedOperator) {
if (SubscriptThisObjType != AtThisObjType)
continue;
- const bool CorrectName = Method->getNameInfo().getAsString() == "at";
- if (!CorrectName)
+ if (!Method->getNameInfo().getName().isIdentifier() ||
+ Method->getName() != "at")
continue;
const bool SameReturnType =
>From fae0f3a2347e7972749e66c3dff43e321b671d1d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Paul=20Heidekr=C3=BCger?= <paul.heidekrueger at tum.de>
Date: Thu, 8 Aug 2024 11:33:36 +0200
Subject: [PATCH 39/48] Add TODO comment re: findAlternative()'s capabilities
in class hierarchies
Co-authored-by: Manuel Pietsch <manuelpietsch at outlook.de>
---
.../ProBoundsAvoidUncheckedContainerAccesses.cpp | 3 +++
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
diff --git a/clang-tools-extra/clang-tidy/cppcoreguidelines/ProBoundsAvoidUncheckedContainerAccesses.cpp b/clang-tools-extra/clang-tidy/cppcoreguidelines/ProBoundsAvoidUncheckedContainerAccesses.cpp
index c0f1fbd7923758..2bd4b2b96506a2 100644
--- a/clang-tools-extra/clang-tidy/cppcoreguidelines/ProBoundsAvoidUncheckedContainerAccesses.cpp
+++ b/clang-tools-extra/clang-tidy/cppcoreguidelines/ProBoundsAvoidUncheckedContainerAccesses.cpp
@@ -55,6 +55,9 @@ void ProBoundsAvoidUncheckedContainerAccesses::storeOptions(
Serialized.substr(0, Serialized.size() - DefaultsStringLength));
}
+// TODO: if at() is defined in another class in the class hierarchy of the class
+// that defines the operator[] we matched on, findAlternative() will not detect
+// it.
static const CXXMethodDecl *
findAlternative(const CXXMethodDecl *MatchedOperator) {
const CXXRecordDecl *Parent = MatchedOperator->getParent();
>From b9728bb446df234f5f4a165de2fcf19b56fc46dc Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Paul=20Heidekr=C3=BCger?= <paul.heidekrueger at tum.de>
Date: Thu, 8 Aug 2024 12:52:25 +0200
Subject: [PATCH 40/48] Reduce size of SourceRange when printing warnings
Co-authored-by: Manuel Pietsch <manuelpietsch at outlook.de>
---
.../ProBoundsAvoidUncheckedContainerAccesses.cpp | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/clang-tools-extra/clang-tidy/cppcoreguidelines/ProBoundsAvoidUncheckedContainerAccesses.cpp b/clang-tools-extra/clang-tidy/cppcoreguidelines/ProBoundsAvoidUncheckedContainerAccesses.cpp
index 2bd4b2b96506a2..77798ccebdf897 100644
--- a/clang-tools-extra/clang-tidy/cppcoreguidelines/ProBoundsAvoidUncheckedContainerAccesses.cpp
+++ b/clang-tools-extra/clang-tidy/cppcoreguidelines/ProBoundsAvoidUncheckedContainerAccesses.cpp
@@ -129,9 +129,9 @@ void ProBoundsAvoidUncheckedContainerAccesses::check(
const auto *MatchedExpr = Result.Nodes.getNodeAs<CallExpr>("caller");
- diag(MatchedExpr->getBeginLoc(),
+ diag(MatchedExpr->getCallee()->getBeginLoc(),
"found possibly unsafe 'operator[]', consider using 'at()' instead")
- << MatchedExpr->getSourceRange();
+ << MatchedExpr->getCallee()->getSourceRange();
diag(Alternative->getBeginLoc(), "alternative 'at()' defined here",
DiagnosticIDs::Note)
<< Alternative->getNameInfo().getSourceRange();
>From 779be33adfa75a51a2a97ca3b0b658a6e599c45f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Paul=20Heidekr=C3=BCger?= <paul.heidekrueger at tum.de>
Date: Thu, 8 Aug 2024 16:09:34 +0200
Subject: [PATCH 41/48] Add customizable fixit suggestions
Co-authored-by: Manuel Pietsch <manuelpietsch at outlook.de>
---
...oBoundsAvoidUncheckedContainerAccesses.cpp | 142 ++++++++++++++++--
...ProBoundsAvoidUncheckedContainerAccesses.h | 21 ++-
2 files changed, 145 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
diff --git a/clang-tools-extra/clang-tidy/cppcoreguidelines/ProBoundsAvoidUncheckedContainerAccesses.cpp b/clang-tools-extra/clang-tidy/cppcoreguidelines/ProBoundsAvoidUncheckedContainerAccesses.cpp
index 77798ccebdf897..09950ca516f585 100644
--- a/clang-tools-extra/clang-tidy/cppcoreguidelines/ProBoundsAvoidUncheckedContainerAccesses.cpp
+++ b/clang-tools-extra/clang-tidy/cppcoreguidelines/ProBoundsAvoidUncheckedContainerAccesses.cpp
@@ -31,11 +31,15 @@ ProBoundsAvoidUncheckedContainerAccesses::
SubscriptExcludedClasses.insert(SubscriptExcludedClasses.end(),
SubscriptDefaultExclusions.begin(),
SubscriptDefaultExclusions.end());
+ SubscriptFixMode = Options.get("SubscriptFixMode", None);
+ SubscriptFixFunction = Options.get("SubscriptFixFunction", "gsl::at");
}
void ProBoundsAvoidUncheckedContainerAccesses::storeOptions(
ClangTidyOptions::OptionMap &Opts) {
+ Options.store(Opts, "SubscriptFixFunction", SubscriptFixFunction);
+ Options.store(Opts, "SubscriptFixMode", SubscriptFixMode);
if (SubscriptExcludedClasses.size() == SubscriptDefaultExclusions.size()) {
Options.store(Opts, "ExcludeClasses", "");
return;
@@ -51,7 +55,7 @@ void ProBoundsAvoidUncheckedContainerAccesses::storeOptions(
std::string Serialized = clang::tidy::utils::options::serializeStringList(
SubscriptExcludedClasses);
- Options.store(Opts, "ExcludeClasses",
+ Options.store(Opts, "SubscriptExcludeClasses",
Serialized.substr(0, Serialized.size() - DefaultsStringLength));
}
@@ -59,7 +63,7 @@ void ProBoundsAvoidUncheckedContainerAccesses::storeOptions(
// that defines the operator[] we matched on, findAlternative() will not detect
// it.
static const CXXMethodDecl *
-findAlternative(const CXXMethodDecl *MatchedOperator) {
+findAlternativeAt(const CXXMethodDecl *MatchedOperator) {
const CXXRecordDecl *Parent = MatchedOperator->getParent();
const QualType SubscriptThisObjType =
MatchedOperator->getFunctionObjectParameterReferenceType();
@@ -109,8 +113,6 @@ void ProBoundsAvoidUncheckedContainerAccesses::registerMatchers(
Finder->addMatcher(
mapAnyOf(cxxOperatorCallExpr, cxxMemberCallExpr)
.with(callee(cxxMethodDecl(hasOverloadedOperatorName("[]"),
- ofClass(cxxRecordDecl(hasMethod(
- cxxMethodDecl(hasName("at"))))),
unless(matchers::matchesAnyListedName(
SubscriptExcludedClasses)))
.bind("operator")))
@@ -120,21 +122,129 @@ void ProBoundsAvoidUncheckedContainerAccesses::registerMatchers(
void ProBoundsAvoidUncheckedContainerAccesses::check(
const MatchFinder::MatchResult &Result) {
- const auto *MatchedOperator =
- Result.Nodes.getNodeAs<CXXMethodDecl>("operator");
- const CXXMethodDecl *Alternative = findAlternative(MatchedOperator);
-
- if (!Alternative)
- return;
const auto *MatchedExpr = Result.Nodes.getNodeAs<CallExpr>("caller");
- diag(MatchedExpr->getCallee()->getBeginLoc(),
- "found possibly unsafe 'operator[]', consider using 'at()' instead")
- << MatchedExpr->getCallee()->getSourceRange();
- diag(Alternative->getBeginLoc(), "alternative 'at()' defined here",
- DiagnosticIDs::Note)
- << Alternative->getNameInfo().getSourceRange();
+ if (SubscriptFixMode == None) {
+ diag(MatchedExpr->getCallee()->getBeginLoc(),
+ "possibly unsafe 'operator[]', consider bound-safe alternatives")
+ << MatchedExpr->getCallee()->getSourceRange();
+ return;
+ }
+
+ if (const auto *OCE = dyn_cast<CXXOperatorCallExpr>(MatchedExpr)) {
+ // Case: a[i]
+ auto LeftBracket = SourceRange(OCE->getCallee()->getBeginLoc(),
+ OCE->getCallee()->getBeginLoc());
+ auto RightBracket =
+ SourceRange(OCE->getOperatorLoc(), OCE->getOperatorLoc());
+
+ if (SubscriptFixMode == At) {
+ // Case: a[i] => a.at(i)
+ const auto *MatchedOperator =
+ Result.Nodes.getNodeAs<CXXMethodDecl>("operator");
+ const CXXMethodDecl *Alternative = findAlternativeAt(MatchedOperator);
+
+ if (!Alternative) {
+ diag(MatchedExpr->getCallee()->getBeginLoc(),
+ "possibly unsafe 'operator[]', consider "
+ "bound-safe alternatives")
+ << MatchedExpr->getCallee()->getSourceRange();
+ return;
+ }
+
+ diag(MatchedExpr->getCallee()->getBeginLoc(),
+ "possibly unsafe 'operator[]', consider "
+ "bound-safe alternative 'at()'")
+ << MatchedExpr->getCallee()->getSourceRange()
+ << FixItHint::CreateReplacement(LeftBracket, ".at(")
+ << FixItHint::CreateReplacement(RightBracket, ")");
+
+ diag(Alternative->getBeginLoc(), "viable 'at()' is defined here",
+ DiagnosticIDs::Note)
+ << Alternative->getNameInfo().getSourceRange();
+
+ } else if (SubscriptFixMode == Function) {
+ // Case: a[i] => f(a, i)
+ diag(MatchedExpr->getCallee()->getBeginLoc(),
+ "possibly unsafe 'operator[]', use safe function '" +
+ SubscriptFixFunction.str() + "()' instead")
+ << MatchedExpr->getCallee()->getSourceRange()
+ << FixItHint::CreateInsertion(MatchedExpr->getBeginLoc(),
+ SubscriptFixFunction.str() + "(")
+ // Since C++23, the subscript operator may also be called without an
+ // argument, which makes the following distinction necessary
+ << (MatchedExpr->getDirectCallee()->getNumParams() > 0
+ ? FixItHint::CreateReplacement(LeftBracket, ", ")
+ : FixItHint::CreateRemoval(LeftBracket))
+ << FixItHint::CreateReplacement(RightBracket, ")");
+ }
+ } else if (const auto *MCE = dyn_cast<CXXMemberCallExpr>(MatchedExpr)) {
+ // Case: a.operator[](i) or a->operator[](i)
+ const auto *Callee = dyn_cast<MemberExpr>(MCE->getCallee());
+
+ if (SubscriptFixMode == At) {
+ // Cases: a.operator[](i) => a.at(i) and a->operator[](i) => a->at(i)
+
+ const auto *MatchedOperator =
+ Result.Nodes.getNodeAs<CXXMethodDecl>("operator");
+
+ const CXXMethodDecl *Alternative = findAlternativeAt(MatchedOperator);
+ if (!Alternative) {
+ diag(Callee->getBeginLoc(), "possibly unsafe 'operator[]', consider "
+ "bound-safe alternative 'at()'")
+ << Callee->getSourceRange();
+ return;
+ }
+ diag(MatchedExpr->getCallee()->getBeginLoc(),
+ "possibly unsafe 'operator[]', consider "
+ "bound-safe alternative 'at()'")
+ << FixItHint::CreateReplacement(
+ SourceRange(Callee->getMemberLoc(), Callee->getEndLoc()),
+ "at");
+
+ diag(Alternative->getBeginLoc(), "viable 'at()' defined here",
+ DiagnosticIDs::Note)
+ << Alternative->getNameInfo().getSourceRange();
+
+ } else if (SubscriptFixMode == Function) {
+ // Cases: a.operator[](i) => f(a, i) and a->operator[](i) => f(*a, i)
+ const auto *Callee = dyn_cast<MemberExpr>(MCE->getCallee());
+ std::string BeginInsertion = SubscriptFixFunction.str() + "(";
+
+ if (Callee->isArrow())
+ BeginInsertion += "*";
+
+ diag(Callee->getBeginLoc(),
+ "possibly unsafe 'operator[]', use safe function '" +
+ SubscriptFixFunction.str() + "()' instead")
+ << Callee->getSourceRange()
+ << FixItHint::CreateInsertion(MatchedExpr->getBeginLoc(),
+ BeginInsertion)
+ // Since C++23, the subscript operator may also be called without an
+ // argument, which makes the following distinction necessary
+ << ((MCE->getMethodDecl()->getNumNonObjectParams() > 0)
+ ? FixItHint::CreateReplacement(
+ SourceRange(
+ Callee->getOperatorLoc(),
+ MCE->getArg(0)->getBeginLoc().getLocWithOffset(-1)),
+ ", ")
+ : FixItHint::CreateRemoval(
+ SourceRange(Callee->getOperatorLoc(),
+ MCE->getRParenLoc().getLocWithOffset(-1))));
+ }
+ }
}
} // namespace clang::tidy::cppcoreguidelines
+
+namespace clang::tidy {
+using P = cppcoreguidelines::ProBoundsAvoidUncheckedContainerAccesses;
+
+llvm::ArrayRef<std::pair<P::SubscriptFixModes, StringRef>>
+OptionEnumMapping<P::SubscriptFixModes>::getEnumMapping() {
+ static constexpr std::pair<P::SubscriptFixModes, StringRef> Mapping[] = {
+ {P::None, "None"}, {P::At, "at"}, {P::Function, "function"}};
+ return {Mapping};
+}
+} // namespace clang::tidy
diff --git a/clang-tools-extra/clang-tidy/cppcoreguidelines/ProBoundsAvoidUncheckedContainerAccesses.h b/clang-tools-extra/clang-tidy/cppcoreguidelines/ProBoundsAvoidUncheckedContainerAccesses.h
index a4770384db0ab2..aa2d3e94d04678 100644
--- a/clang-tools-extra/clang-tidy/cppcoreguidelines/ProBoundsAvoidUncheckedContainerAccesses.h
+++ b/clang-tools-extra/clang-tidy/cppcoreguidelines/ProBoundsAvoidUncheckedContainerAccesses.h
@@ -13,7 +13,8 @@
namespace clang::tidy::cppcoreguidelines {
-/// Flags the unsafe ``operator[]`` and suggests replacing it with ``at()``.
+/// Flags the unsafe ``operator[]``. Can suggests fixing it with ``at()`` or a
+/// user-provided function.
///
/// See
/// https://isocpp.github.io/CppCoreGuidelines/CppCoreGuidelines#slcon3-avoid-bounds-errors
@@ -30,11 +31,27 @@ class ProBoundsAvoidUncheckedContainerAccesses : public ClangTidyCheck {
void check(const ast_matchers::MatchFinder::MatchResult &Result) override;
void storeOptions(ClangTidyOptions::OptionMap &Opts) override;
+ enum SubscriptFixModes { None, At, Function };
+
private:
// A list of class names that are excluded from the warning
std::vector<llvm::StringRef> SubscriptExcludedClasses;
+ // Setting which fix to suggest
+ SubscriptFixModes SubscriptFixMode;
+ llvm::StringRef SubscriptFixFunction;
};
-
} // namespace clang::tidy::cppcoreguidelines
+namespace clang::tidy {
+template <>
+struct OptionEnumMapping<
+ cppcoreguidelines::ProBoundsAvoidUncheckedContainerAccesses::
+ SubscriptFixModes> {
+ static ArrayRef<
+ std::pair<cppcoreguidelines::ProBoundsAvoidUncheckedContainerAccesses::
+ SubscriptFixModes,
+ StringRef>>
+ getEnumMapping();
+};
+} // namespace clang::tidy
#endif // LLVM_CLANG_TOOLS_EXTRA_CLANG_TIDY_CPPCOREGUIDELINES_PRO_BOUNDS_AVOID_UNCHECKED_CONTAINER_ACCESSES_H
>From c69844ae44c540a9f47fda2b7dbd5aa3ba851888 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Paul=20Heidekr=C3=BCger?= <paul.heidekrueger at tum.de>
Date: Thu, 8 Aug 2024 16:15:41 +0200
Subject: [PATCH 42/48] Document customizable fixit suggestions
Co-authored-by: Manuel Pietsch <manuelpietsch at outlook.de>
---
clang-tools-extra/docs/ReleaseNotes.rst | 3 ++-
...nds-avoid-unchecked-container-accesses.rst | 21 ++++++++++++++-----
.../docs/clang-tidy/checks/list.rst | 2 +-
3 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/clang-tools-extra/docs/ReleaseNotes.rst b/clang-tools-extra/docs/ReleaseNotes.rst
index dd08e3cfb56fbc..ff18c3c2abfa5e 100644
--- a/clang-tools-extra/docs/ReleaseNotes.rst
+++ b/clang-tools-extra/docs/ReleaseNotes.rst
@@ -136,7 +136,8 @@ New checks
- New :doc:`cppcoreguidelines-pro-bounds-avoid-unchecked-container-accesses
<clang-tidy/checks/cppcoreguidelines/pro-bounds-avoid-unchecked-container-accesses>` check.
- Flags the unsafe ``operator[]`` and suggests replacing it with ``at()``.
+ Flags the unsafe ``operator[]``. Can suggests fixing it with ``at()`` or a
+ user-provided function.
New check aliases
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
diff --git a/clang-tools-extra/docs/clang-tidy/checks/cppcoreguidelines/pro-bounds-avoid-unchecked-container-accesses.rst b/clang-tools-extra/docs/clang-tidy/checks/cppcoreguidelines/pro-bounds-avoid-unchecked-container-accesses.rst
index 4bc91adb2ee62a..62540f106e4bdc 100644
--- a/clang-tools-extra/docs/clang-tidy/checks/cppcoreguidelines/pro-bounds-avoid-unchecked-container-accesses.rst
+++ b/clang-tools-extra/docs/clang-tidy/checks/cppcoreguidelines/pro-bounds-avoid-unchecked-container-accesses.rst
@@ -1,9 +1,10 @@
.. title:: clang-tidy - cppcoreguidelines-pro-bounds-avoid-unchecked-container-accesses
cppcoreguidelines-pro-bounds-avoid-unchecked-container-accesses
-===================================================
+===============================================================
-Flags the unsafe ``operator[]`` and suggests replacing it with ``at()``.
+Flags the unsafe ``operator[]``. Can suggests fixing it with ``at()`` or a
+user-provided function.
For example the code
@@ -19,7 +20,7 @@ will generate a warning but
std::unique_ptr<vector> a;
int b = a[0];
-will not.
+will generate a warning.
The classes ``std::map``, ``std::unordered_map`` and ``std::flat_map`` are
excluded from this check, because their subscript operator has a defined
@@ -28,13 +29,23 @@ behaviour when a key does not exist (inserting a new element).
This check enforces part of the `SL.con.3
<https://isocpp.github.io/CppCoreGuidelines/CppCoreGuidelines#slcon3-avoid-bounds-errors>`
guideline and is part of the `Bounds Safety (Bounds 4)
-<https://isocpp.github.io/CppCoreGuidelines/CppCoreGuidelines#Pro-bounds-arrayindex>` profile
+<https://isocpp.github.io/CppCoreGuidelines/CppCoreGuidelines#Pro-bounds-arrayindex>`
profile from the C++ Core Guidelines.
Options
-------
-.. option:: ExcludeClasses
+.. option:: SubscriptExcludeClasses
Semicolon-delimited list of class names that should additionally be
excluded from this check. By default empty.
+
+.. option:: SubscriptFixMode
+
+ Determines what fixes are suggested. Either `None` (default), `at` (use
+ ``a.at(index)`` if a fitting function exists ) or `function` (use a
+ function ``f(a, index)``).
+
+.. option:: SubscriptFixFunction
+
+ The function to use in the `function` mode. ``gsl::at`` by default.
diff --git a/clang-tools-extra/docs/clang-tidy/checks/list.rst b/clang-tools-extra/docs/clang-tidy/checks/list.rst
index bc774e0010d441..0d199d44e79aec 100644
--- a/clang-tools-extra/docs/clang-tidy/checks/list.rst
+++ b/clang-tools-extra/docs/clang-tidy/checks/list.rst
@@ -193,7 +193,7 @@ Clang-Tidy Checks
:doc:`cppcoreguidelines-owning-memory <cppcoreguidelines/owning-memory>`,
:doc:`cppcoreguidelines-prefer-member-initializer <cppcoreguidelines/prefer-member-initializer>`, "Yes"
:doc:`cppcoreguidelines-pro-bounds-array-to-pointer-decay <cppcoreguidelines/pro-bounds-array-to-pointer-decay>`,
- :doc:`cppcoreguidelines-pro-bounds-avoid-unchecked-container-accesses <cppcoreguidelines/pro-bounds-avoid-unchecked-container-accesses>`,
+ :doc:`cppcoreguidelines-pro-bounds-avoid-unchecked-container-accesses <cppcoreguidelines/pro-bounds-avoid-unchecked-container-accesses>`, "Yes"
:doc:`cppcoreguidelines-pro-bounds-constant-array-index <cppcoreguidelines/pro-bounds-constant-array-index>`, "Yes"
:doc:`cppcoreguidelines-pro-bounds-pointer-arithmetic <cppcoreguidelines/pro-bounds-pointer-arithmetic>`,
:doc:`cppcoreguidelines-pro-type-const-cast <cppcoreguidelines/pro-type-const-cast>`,
>From 0d4df9caa65929dae21fe3f3a4f1a2c23b47a89b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Paul=20Heidekr=C3=BCger?= <paul.heidekrueger at tum.de>
Date: Thu, 8 Aug 2024 16:10:46 +0200
Subject: [PATCH 43/48] Test customizable fixit suggestions
Co-authored-by: Manuel Pietsch <manuelpietsch at outlook.de>
---
...nds-avoid-unchecked-container-accesses.cpp | 124 +++++++++++++++---
1 file changed, 103 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
diff --git a/clang-tools-extra/test/clang-tidy/checkers/cppcoreguidelines/pro-bounds-avoid-unchecked-container-accesses.cpp b/clang-tools-extra/test/clang-tidy/checkers/cppcoreguidelines/pro-bounds-avoid-unchecked-container-accesses.cpp
index 447b4d1bed195a..b7f5e9ba3e5cb8 100644
--- a/clang-tools-extra/test/clang-tidy/checkers/cppcoreguidelines/pro-bounds-avoid-unchecked-container-accesses.cpp
+++ b/clang-tools-extra/test/clang-tidy/checkers/cppcoreguidelines/pro-bounds-avoid-unchecked-container-accesses.cpp
@@ -1,16 +1,33 @@
-// RUN: %check_clang_tidy %s \
+// RUN: %check_clang_tidy -std=c++2b -check-suffix=DEFAULT %s \
// RUN: cppcoreguidelines-pro-bounds-avoid-unchecked-container-accesses %t -- \
// RUN: -config='{CheckOptions: {cppcoreguidelines-pro-bounds-avoid-unchecked-container-accesses.ExcludeClasses: "::ExcludedClass1;::ExcludedClass2"}}'
+// RUN: %check_clang_tidy -std=c++2b -check-suffix=AT %s \
+// RUN: cppcoreguidelines-pro-bounds-avoid-unchecked-container-accesses %t -- \
+// RUN: -config='{CheckOptions: {cppcoreguidelines-pro-bounds-avoid-unchecked-container-accesses.ExcludeClasses: "::ExcludedClass1;::ExcludedClass2", \
+// RUN: cppcoreguidelines-pro-bounds-avoid-unchecked-container-accesses.SubscriptFixMode: at}}'
+
+// RUN: %check_clang_tidy -std=c++2b -check-suffix=FUNC %s \
+// RUN: cppcoreguidelines-pro-bounds-avoid-unchecked-container-accesses %t -- \
+// RUN: -config='{CheckOptions: {cppcoreguidelines-pro-bounds-avoid-unchecked-container-accesses.ExcludeClasses: "::ExcludedClass1;::ExcludedClass2", \
+// RUN: cppcoreguidelines-pro-bounds-avoid-unchecked-container-accesses.SubscriptFixMode: function, \
+// RUN: cppcoreguidelines-pro-bounds-avoid-unchecked-container-accesses.SubscriptFixFunction: "f"}}'
+
namespace std {
template<typename T, unsigned size>
struct array {
T operator[](unsigned i) {
return T{1};
}
+ T operator[]() {
+ return T{1};
+ }
T at(unsigned i) {
return T{1};
}
+ T at() {
+ return T{1};
+ }
};
template<typename T, typename V>
@@ -69,49 +86,96 @@ class ExcludedClass2 {
}
};
+template<class T> int f(T, unsigned){ return 0;}
+template<class T> int f(T){ return 0;}
+
std::array<int, 3> a;
auto b = a[0];
-// CHECK-MESSAGES: :[[@LINE-1]]:10: warning: found possibly unsafe 'operator[]', consider using 'at()' instead [cppcoreguidelines-pro-bounds-avoid-unchecked-container-accesses]
+// CHECK-MESSAGES-DEFAULT: :[[@LINE-1]]:11: warning: possibly unsafe 'operator[]', consider bound-safe alternatives [cppcoreguidelines-pro-bounds-avoid-unchecked-container-accesses]
+// CHECK-FIXES-AT: auto b = a.at(0);
+// CHECK-FIXES-FUNC: auto b = f(a, 0);
+
+auto b23 = a[];
+// CHECK-MESSAGES-DEFAULT: :[[@LINE-1]]:13: warning: possibly unsafe 'operator[]', consider bound-safe alternatives [cppcoreguidelines-pro-bounds-avoid-unchecked-container-accesses]
+// CHECK-FIXES-AT: auto b23 = a.at();
+// CHECK-FIXES-FUNC: auto b23 = f(a);
+
auto c = a[1+1];
-// CHECK-MESSAGES: :[[@LINE-1]]:10: warning: found possibly unsafe 'operator[]', consider using 'at()' instead [cppcoreguidelines-pro-bounds-avoid-unchecked-container-accesses]
+// CHECK-MESSAGES-DEFAULT: :[[@LINE-1]]:11: warning: possibly unsafe 'operator[]', consider bound-safe alternatives [cppcoreguidelines-pro-bounds-avoid-unchecked-container-accesses]
+// CHECK-FIXES-AT: auto c = a.at(1+1);
+// CHECK-FIXES-FUNC: auto c = f(a, 1+1);
constexpr int Index = 1;
auto d = a[Index];
-// CHECK-MESSAGES: :[[@LINE-1]]:10: warning: found possibly unsafe 'operator[]', consider using 'at()' instead [cppcoreguidelines-pro-bounds-avoid-unchecked-container-accesses]
+// CHECK-MESSAGES-DEFAULT: :[[@LINE-1]]:11: warning: possibly unsafe 'operator[]', consider bound-safe alternatives [cppcoreguidelines-pro-bounds-avoid-unchecked-container-accesses]
+// CHECK-FIXES-AT: auto d = a.at(Index);
+// CHECK-FIXES-FUNC: auto d = f(a, Index);
int e(int Ind) {
return a[Ind];
- // CHECK-MESSAGES: :[[@LINE-1]]:10: warning: found possibly unsafe 'operator[]', consider using 'at()' instead [cppcoreguidelines-pro-bounds-avoid-unchecked-container-accesses]
+ // CHECK-MESSAGES-DEFAULT: :[[@LINE-1]]:11: warning: possibly unsafe 'operator[]', consider bound-safe alternatives [cppcoreguidelines-pro-bounds-avoid-unchecked-container-accesses]
+ // CHECK-FIXES-AT: return a.at(Ind);
+ // CHECK-FIXES-FUNC: return f(a, Ind);
}
-auto f = (&a)->operator[](1);
-// CHECK-MESSAGES: :[[@LINE-1]]:10: warning: found possibly unsafe 'operator[]', consider using 'at()' instead [cppcoreguidelines-pro-bounds-avoid-unchecked-container-accesses]
+auto fa = (&a)->operator[](1);
+// CHECK-MESSAGES-DEFAULT: :[[@LINE-1]]:11: warning: possibly unsafe 'operator[]', consider bound-safe alternatives [cppcoreguidelines-pro-bounds-avoid-unchecked-container-accesses]
+// CHECK-FIXES-AT: auto fa = (&a)->at(1);
+// CHECK-FIXES-FUNC: auto fa = f(*(&a), 1);
+
+auto fd = a.operator[](1);
+// CHECK-MESSAGES-DEFAULT: :[[@LINE-1]]:11: warning: possibly unsafe 'operator[]', consider bound-safe alternatives [cppcoreguidelines-pro-bounds-avoid-unchecked-container-accesses]
+// CHECK-FIXES-AT: auto fd = a.at(1);
+// CHECK-FIXES-FUNC: auto fd = f(a, 1);
+//
+auto fa23 = (&a)->operator[]();
+// CHECK-MESSAGES-DEFAULT: :[[@LINE-1]]:13: warning: possibly unsafe 'operator[]', consider bound-safe alternatives [cppcoreguidelines-pro-bounds-avoid-unchecked-container-accesses]
+// CHECK-FIXES-AT: auto fa23 = (&a)->at();
+// CHECK-FIXES-FUNC: auto fa23 = f(*(&a));
+
+auto fd23 = a.operator[]();
+// CHECK-MESSAGES-DEFAULT: :[[@LINE-1]]:13: warning: possibly unsafe 'operator[]', consider bound-safe alternatives [cppcoreguidelines-pro-bounds-avoid-unchecked-container-accesses]
+// CHECK-FIXES-AT: auto fd23 = a.at();
+// CHECK-FIXES-FUNC: auto fd23 = f(a);
auto g = a.at(0);
std::unique_ptr<int> p;
auto q = p[0];
+// CHECK-MESSAGES-DEFAULT: :[[@LINE-1]]:11: warning: possibly unsafe 'operator[]', consider bound-safe alternatives [cppcoreguidelines-pro-bounds-avoid-unchecked-container-accesses]
+// CHECK-FIXES-AT: auto q = p[0];
+// CHECK-FIXES-FUNC: auto q = f(p, 0);
std::span<int> s;
auto t = s[0];
+// CHECK-MESSAGES-DEFAULT: :[[@LINE-1]]:11: warning: possibly unsafe 'operator[]', consider bound-safe alternatives [cppcoreguidelines-pro-bounds-avoid-unchecked-container-accesses]
+// CHECK-FIXES-AT: auto t = s[0];
+// CHECK-FIXES-FUNC: auto t = f(s, 0);
json::node<int> n;
auto m = n[0];
+// CHECK-MESSAGES-DEFAULT: :[[@LINE-1]]:11: warning: possibly unsafe 'operator[]', consider bound-safe alternatives [cppcoreguidelines-pro-bounds-avoid-unchecked-container-accesses]
+// CHECK-FIXES-AT: auto m = n[0];
+// CHECK-FIXES-FUNC: auto m = f(n, 0);
SubClass Sub;
auto r = Sub[0];
-// CHECK-MESSAGES: :[[@LINE-1]]:10: warning: found possibly unsafe 'operator[]', consider using 'at()' instead [cppcoreguidelines-pro-bounds-avoid-unchecked-container-accesses]
+// CHECK-MESSAGES-DEFAULT: :[[@LINE-1]]:13: warning: possibly unsafe 'operator[]', consider bound-safe alternatives [cppcoreguidelines-pro-bounds-avoid-unchecked-container-accesses]
+// CHECK-FIXES-AT: auto r = Sub.at(0);
+// CHECK-FIXES-FUNC: auto r = f(Sub, 0);
typedef std::array<int, 3> ar;
ar BehindDef;
auto u = BehindDef[0];
-// CHECK-MESSAGES: :[[@LINE-1]]:10: warning: found possibly unsafe 'operator[]', consider using 'at()' instead [cppcoreguidelines-pro-bounds-avoid-unchecked-container-accesses]
+// CHECK-MESSAGES-DEFAULT: :[[@LINE-1]]:19: warning: possibly unsafe 'operator[]', consider bound-safe alternatives [cppcoreguidelines-pro-bounds-avoid-unchecked-container-accesses]
+// CHECK-FIXES-AT: auto u = BehindDef.at(0);
+// CHECK-FIXES-FUNC: auto u = f(BehindDef, 0);
template<typename T> int TestTemplate(T t){
return t[0];
- // CHECK-MESSAGES: :[[@LINE-1]]:10: warning: found possibly unsafe 'operator[]', consider using 'at()' instead [cppcoreguidelines-pro-bounds-avoid-unchecked-container-accesses]
+ // CHECK-MESSAGES-DEFAULT: :[[@LINE-1]]:10: warning: possibly unsafe 'operator[]', consider bound-safe alternatives [cppcoreguidelines-pro-bounds-avoid-unchecked-container-accesses]
}
@@ -119,27 +183,45 @@ template<typename T> int TestTemplate(T t){
auto v = TestTemplate<>(a);
auto w = TestTemplate<>(p);
-std::map<int,int> TestMap;
-auto x = TestTemplate<>(TestMap);
-
-auto y = TestMap[0];
-
-//explicitely excluded classes / struct / template
+//excluded classes
ExcludedClass1 E1;
auto x1 = E1[0];
ExcludedClass2 E2;
auto x2 = E1[0];
-#define SUBSCRIPT_BEHIND_MARCO(x) a[x]
+std::map<int,int> TestMap;
+auto y = TestMap[0];
+
+#define SUBSCRIPT_BEHIND_MACRO(x) a[x]
#define ARG_BEHIND_MACRO 0
#define OBJECT_BEHIND_MACRO a
-auto m1 = SUBSCRIPT_BEHIND_MARCO(0);
-// CHECK-MESSAGES: :[[@LINE-1]]:11: warning: found possibly unsafe 'operator[]', consider using 'at()' instead [cppcoreguidelines-pro-bounds-avoid-unchecked-container-accesses]
+auto m1 = SUBSCRIPT_BEHIND_MACRO(0);
+// CHECK-MESSAGES-DEFAULT: :[[@LINE-1]]:11: warning: possibly unsafe 'operator[]', consider bound-safe alternatives [cppcoreguidelines-pro-bounds-avoid-unchecked-container-accesses]
auto m2 = a[ARG_BEHIND_MACRO];
-// CHECK-MESSAGES: :[[@LINE-1]]:11: warning: found possibly unsafe 'operator[]', consider using 'at()' instead [cppcoreguidelines-pro-bounds-avoid-unchecked-container-accesses]
+// CHECK-MESSAGES-DEFAULT: :[[@LINE-1]]:12: warning: possibly unsafe 'operator[]', consider bound-safe alternatives [cppcoreguidelines-pro-bounds-avoid-unchecked-container-accesses]
+// CHECK-FIXES-AT: auto m2 = a.at(ARG_BEHIND_MACRO);
+// CHECK-FIXES-FUNC: auto m2 = f(a, ARG_BEHIND_MACRO);
auto m3 = OBJECT_BEHIND_MACRO[0];
-// CHECK-MESSAGES: :[[@LINE-1]]:11: warning: found possibly unsafe 'operator[]', consider using 'at()' instead [cppcoreguidelines-pro-bounds-avoid-unchecked-container-accesses]
+// CHECK-MESSAGES-DEFAULT: :[[@LINE-1]]:30: warning: possibly unsafe 'operator[]', consider bound-safe alternatives [cppcoreguidelines-pro-bounds-avoid-unchecked-container-accesses]
+// CHECK-FIXES-AT: auto m3 = OBJECT_BEHIND_MACRO.at(0);
+// CHECK-FIXES-FUNC: auto m3 = f(OBJECT_BEHIND_MACRO, 0);
+
+// Check that spacing does not invalidate the fixes
+std::array<int , 3> longname;
+
+auto z1 = longname [ 0 ] ;
+// CHECK-MESSAGES-DEFAULT: :[[@LINE-1]]:22: warning: possibly unsafe 'operator[]', consider bound-safe alternatives [cppcoreguidelines-pro-bounds-avoid-unchecked-container-accesses]
+// CHECK-FIXES-AT: auto z1 = longname .at( 0 ) ;
+// CHECK-FIXES-FUNC: auto z1 = f(longname , 0 ) ;
+auto z2 = longname . operator[] ( 0 );
+// CHECK-MESSAGES-DEFAULT: :[[@LINE-1]]:11: warning: possibly unsafe 'operator[]', consider bound-safe alternatives [cppcoreguidelines-pro-bounds-avoid-unchecked-container-accesses]
+// CHECK-FIXES-AT: auto z2 = longname . at ( 0 );
+// CHECK-FIXES-FUNC: auto z2 = f(longname , 0 );
+auto z3 = (&longname) -> operator[] ( 0 );
+// CHECK-MESSAGES-DEFAULT: :[[@LINE-1]]:11: warning: possibly unsafe 'operator[]', consider bound-safe alternatives [cppcoreguidelines-pro-bounds-avoid-unchecked-container-accesses]
+// CHECK-FIXES-AT: auto z3 = (&longname) -> at ( 0 );
+// CHECK-FIXES-FUNC: auto z3 = f(*(&longname) , 0 );
>From 4c35d0b063ff86434cd0f2e640df171f13ec2d76 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Paul=20Heidekr=C3=BCger?= <paul.heidekrueger at tum.de>
Date: Sat, 26 Oct 2024 20:43:04 +0200
Subject: [PATCH 44/48] Remove rebase artifacts in ReleaseNotes.rst
Co-authored-by: Manuel Pietsch <manuelpietsch at outlook.de>
---
clang-tools-extra/docs/ReleaseNotes.rst | 32 -------------------------
1 file changed, 32 deletions(-)
diff --git a/clang-tools-extra/docs/ReleaseNotes.rst b/clang-tools-extra/docs/ReleaseNotes.rst
index ff18c3c2abfa5e..95fa04243012db 100644
--- a/clang-tools-extra/docs/ReleaseNotes.rst
+++ b/clang-tools-extra/docs/ReleaseNotes.rst
@@ -101,38 +101,6 @@ Improvements to clang-tidy
New checks
^^^^^^^^^^
-- New :doc:`bugprone-crtp-constructor-accessibility
- <clang-tidy/checks/bugprone/crtp-constructor-accessibility>` check.
-
- Detects error-prone Curiously Recurring Template Pattern usage, when the CRTP
- can be constructed outside itself and the derived class.
-
-- New :doc:`bugprone-return-const-ref-from-parameter
- <clang-tidy/checks/bugprone/return-const-ref-from-parameter>` check.
-
- Detects return statements that return a constant reference parameter as constant
- reference. This may cause use-after-free errors if the caller uses xvalues as
- arguments.
-
-- New :doc:`bugprone-suspicious-stringview-data-usage
- <clang-tidy/checks/bugprone/suspicious-stringview-data-usage>` check.
-
- Identifies suspicious usages of ``std::string_view::data()`` that could lead
- to reading out-of-bounds data due to inadequate or incorrect string null
- termination.
-
-- New :doc:`misc-use-internal-linkage
- <clang-tidy/checks/misc/use-internal-linkage>` check.
-
- Detects variables and functions that can be marked as static or moved into
- an anonymous namespace to enforce internal linkage.
-
-- New :doc:`modernize-min-max-use-initializer-list
- <clang-tidy/checks/modernize/min-max-use-initializer-list>` check.
-
- Replaces nested ``std::min`` and ``std::max`` calls with an initializer list
- where applicable.
-
- New :doc:`cppcoreguidelines-pro-bounds-avoid-unchecked-container-accesses
<clang-tidy/checks/cppcoreguidelines/pro-bounds-avoid-unchecked-container-accesses>` check.
>From 4d25ed8a9d6491e0758d64a268844ef11ffdb5fa Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Paul=20Heidekr=C3=BCger?= <paul.heidekrueger at tum.de>
Date: Sat, 26 Oct 2024 20:56:56 +0200
Subject: [PATCH 45/48] Update one-sentence description of
`cppcoreguidelines-pro-bounds-avoid-unchecked-container-accesses` check
Co-authored-by: Manuel Pietsch <manuelpietsch at outlook.de>
---
.../ProBoundsAvoidUncheckedContainerAccesses.h | 4 ++--
clang-tools-extra/docs/ReleaseNotes.rst | 4 ++--
.../pro-bounds-avoid-unchecked-container-accesses.rst | 4 ++--
3 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/clang-tools-extra/clang-tidy/cppcoreguidelines/ProBoundsAvoidUncheckedContainerAccesses.h b/clang-tools-extra/clang-tidy/cppcoreguidelines/ProBoundsAvoidUncheckedContainerAccesses.h
index aa2d3e94d04678..6e7f28708773e5 100644
--- a/clang-tools-extra/clang-tidy/cppcoreguidelines/ProBoundsAvoidUncheckedContainerAccesses.h
+++ b/clang-tools-extra/clang-tidy/cppcoreguidelines/ProBoundsAvoidUncheckedContainerAccesses.h
@@ -13,8 +13,8 @@
namespace clang::tidy::cppcoreguidelines {
-/// Flags the unsafe ``operator[]``. Can suggests fixing it with ``at()`` or a
-/// user-provided function.
+/// Flags calls to operator[] in STL containers and suggests replacing it with
+/// safe alternatives.
///
/// See
/// https://isocpp.github.io/CppCoreGuidelines/CppCoreGuidelines#slcon3-avoid-bounds-errors
diff --git a/clang-tools-extra/docs/ReleaseNotes.rst b/clang-tools-extra/docs/ReleaseNotes.rst
index 95fa04243012db..aa7018b5bb76a5 100644
--- a/clang-tools-extra/docs/ReleaseNotes.rst
+++ b/clang-tools-extra/docs/ReleaseNotes.rst
@@ -104,8 +104,8 @@ New checks
- New :doc:`cppcoreguidelines-pro-bounds-avoid-unchecked-container-accesses
<clang-tidy/checks/cppcoreguidelines/pro-bounds-avoid-unchecked-container-accesses>` check.
- Flags the unsafe ``operator[]``. Can suggests fixing it with ``at()`` or a
- user-provided function.
+ Flags calls to operator[] in STL containers and suggests replacing it with
+ safe alternatives.
New check aliases
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
diff --git a/clang-tools-extra/docs/clang-tidy/checks/cppcoreguidelines/pro-bounds-avoid-unchecked-container-accesses.rst b/clang-tools-extra/docs/clang-tidy/checks/cppcoreguidelines/pro-bounds-avoid-unchecked-container-accesses.rst
index 62540f106e4bdc..3b546446bb065d 100644
--- a/clang-tools-extra/docs/clang-tidy/checks/cppcoreguidelines/pro-bounds-avoid-unchecked-container-accesses.rst
+++ b/clang-tools-extra/docs/clang-tidy/checks/cppcoreguidelines/pro-bounds-avoid-unchecked-container-accesses.rst
@@ -3,8 +3,8 @@
cppcoreguidelines-pro-bounds-avoid-unchecked-container-accesses
===============================================================
-Flags the unsafe ``operator[]``. Can suggests fixing it with ``at()`` or a
-user-provided function.
+Flags calls to operator[] in STL containers and suggests replacing it with
+safe alternatives.
For example the code
>From 1a2fe2cd2c7b96fe75c0735f8c4e0793847ca397 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Paul=20Heidekr=C3=BCger?= <paul.heidekrueger at tum.de>
Date: Sat, 26 Oct 2024 21:01:59 +0200
Subject: [PATCH 46/48] Format description of the
`cppcoreguidelines-pro-bounds-avoid-unchecked-container-accesses` in
ReleaseNotes.rst
Co-authored-by: Manuel Pietsch <manuelpietsch at outlook.de>
---
clang-tools-extra/docs/ReleaseNotes.rst | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/clang-tools-extra/docs/ReleaseNotes.rst b/clang-tools-extra/docs/ReleaseNotes.rst
index aa7018b5bb76a5..463ab634be5895 100644
--- a/clang-tools-extra/docs/ReleaseNotes.rst
+++ b/clang-tools-extra/docs/ReleaseNotes.rst
@@ -102,7 +102,8 @@ New checks
^^^^^^^^^^
- New :doc:`cppcoreguidelines-pro-bounds-avoid-unchecked-container-accesses
- <clang-tidy/checks/cppcoreguidelines/pro-bounds-avoid-unchecked-container-accesses>` check.
+ <clang-tidy/checks/cppcoreguidelines/pro-bounds-avoid-unchecked-container-accesses>`
+ check.
Flags calls to operator[] in STL containers and suggests replacing it with
safe alternatives.
>From 20b24f19dcb396dfbb84d56f55b81965721ce707 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Paul=20Heidekr=C3=BCger?= <paul.heidekrueger at tum.de>
Date: Sat, 26 Oct 2024 21:06:26 +0200
Subject: [PATCH 47/48] Generalise description of excluded classes in
`pro-bounds-avoid-unchecked-container-accesses.rst`
Co-authored-by: Manuel Pietsch <manuelpietsch at outlook.de>
---
.../pro-bounds-avoid-unchecked-container-accesses.rst | 5 ++---
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/clang-tools-extra/docs/clang-tidy/checks/cppcoreguidelines/pro-bounds-avoid-unchecked-container-accesses.rst b/clang-tools-extra/docs/clang-tidy/checks/cppcoreguidelines/pro-bounds-avoid-unchecked-container-accesses.rst
index 3b546446bb065d..b677e1d34e4145 100644
--- a/clang-tools-extra/docs/clang-tidy/checks/cppcoreguidelines/pro-bounds-avoid-unchecked-container-accesses.rst
+++ b/clang-tools-extra/docs/clang-tidy/checks/cppcoreguidelines/pro-bounds-avoid-unchecked-container-accesses.rst
@@ -22,9 +22,8 @@ will generate a warning but
will generate a warning.
-The classes ``std::map``, ``std::unordered_map`` and ``std::flat_map`` are
-excluded from this check, because their subscript operator has a defined
-behaviour when a key does not exist (inserting a new element).
+STL containers with well-defined behavior for `operator[] are excluded from this
+check.
This check enforces part of the `SL.con.3
<https://isocpp.github.io/CppCoreGuidelines/CppCoreGuidelines#slcon3-avoid-bounds-errors>`
>From 166c30a14c5fd0f37e159ad1ecbf5e3bfecf9629 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Paul=20Heidekr=C3=BCger?= <paul.heidekrueger at tum.de>
Date: Sat, 26 Oct 2024 21:21:47 +0200
Subject: [PATCH 48/48] s/bound-safe/bounds-safe
Co-authored-by: Manuel Pietsch <manuelpietsch at outlook.de>
---
...oBoundsAvoidUncheckedContainerAccesses.cpp | 10 ++---
...nds-avoid-unchecked-container-accesses.cpp | 42 +++++++++----------
2 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)
diff --git a/clang-tools-extra/clang-tidy/cppcoreguidelines/ProBoundsAvoidUncheckedContainerAccesses.cpp b/clang-tools-extra/clang-tidy/cppcoreguidelines/ProBoundsAvoidUncheckedContainerAccesses.cpp
index 09950ca516f585..e2f1072bfbaf0d 100644
--- a/clang-tools-extra/clang-tidy/cppcoreguidelines/ProBoundsAvoidUncheckedContainerAccesses.cpp
+++ b/clang-tools-extra/clang-tidy/cppcoreguidelines/ProBoundsAvoidUncheckedContainerAccesses.cpp
@@ -127,7 +127,7 @@ void ProBoundsAvoidUncheckedContainerAccesses::check(
if (SubscriptFixMode == None) {
diag(MatchedExpr->getCallee()->getBeginLoc(),
- "possibly unsafe 'operator[]', consider bound-safe alternatives")
+ "possibly unsafe 'operator[]', consider bounds-safe alternatives")
<< MatchedExpr->getCallee()->getSourceRange();
return;
}
@@ -148,14 +148,14 @@ void ProBoundsAvoidUncheckedContainerAccesses::check(
if (!Alternative) {
diag(MatchedExpr->getCallee()->getBeginLoc(),
"possibly unsafe 'operator[]', consider "
- "bound-safe alternatives")
+ "bounds-safe alternatives")
<< MatchedExpr->getCallee()->getSourceRange();
return;
}
diag(MatchedExpr->getCallee()->getBeginLoc(),
"possibly unsafe 'operator[]', consider "
- "bound-safe alternative 'at()'")
+ "bounds-safe alternative 'at()'")
<< MatchedExpr->getCallee()->getSourceRange()
<< FixItHint::CreateReplacement(LeftBracket, ".at(")
<< FixItHint::CreateReplacement(RightBracket, ")");
@@ -192,13 +192,13 @@ void ProBoundsAvoidUncheckedContainerAccesses::check(
const CXXMethodDecl *Alternative = findAlternativeAt(MatchedOperator);
if (!Alternative) {
diag(Callee->getBeginLoc(), "possibly unsafe 'operator[]', consider "
- "bound-safe alternative 'at()'")
+ "bounds-safe alternative 'at()'")
<< Callee->getSourceRange();
return;
}
diag(MatchedExpr->getCallee()->getBeginLoc(),
"possibly unsafe 'operator[]', consider "
- "bound-safe alternative 'at()'")
+ "bounds-safe alternative 'at()'")
<< FixItHint::CreateReplacement(
SourceRange(Callee->getMemberLoc(), Callee->getEndLoc()),
"at");
diff --git a/clang-tools-extra/test/clang-tidy/checkers/cppcoreguidelines/pro-bounds-avoid-unchecked-container-accesses.cpp b/clang-tools-extra/test/clang-tidy/checkers/cppcoreguidelines/pro-bounds-avoid-unchecked-container-accesses.cpp
index b7f5e9ba3e5cb8..9cff7c3e54bf3a 100644
--- a/clang-tools-extra/test/clang-tidy/checkers/cppcoreguidelines/pro-bounds-avoid-unchecked-container-accesses.cpp
+++ b/clang-tools-extra/test/clang-tidy/checkers/cppcoreguidelines/pro-bounds-avoid-unchecked-container-accesses.cpp
@@ -92,51 +92,51 @@ template<class T> int f(T){ return 0;}
std::array<int, 3> a;
auto b = a[0];
-// CHECK-MESSAGES-DEFAULT: :[[@LINE-1]]:11: warning: possibly unsafe 'operator[]', consider bound-safe alternatives [cppcoreguidelines-pro-bounds-avoid-unchecked-container-accesses]
+// CHECK-MESSAGES-DEFAULT: :[[@LINE-1]]:11: warning: possibly unsafe 'operator[]', consider bounds-safe alternatives [cppcoreguidelines-pro-bounds-avoid-unchecked-container-accesses]
// CHECK-FIXES-AT: auto b = a.at(0);
// CHECK-FIXES-FUNC: auto b = f(a, 0);
auto b23 = a[];
-// CHECK-MESSAGES-DEFAULT: :[[@LINE-1]]:13: warning: possibly unsafe 'operator[]', consider bound-safe alternatives [cppcoreguidelines-pro-bounds-avoid-unchecked-container-accesses]
+// CHECK-MESSAGES-DEFAULT: :[[@LINE-1]]:13: warning: possibly unsafe 'operator[]', consider bounds-safe alternatives [cppcoreguidelines-pro-bounds-avoid-unchecked-container-accesses]
// CHECK-FIXES-AT: auto b23 = a.at();
// CHECK-FIXES-FUNC: auto b23 = f(a);
auto c = a[1+1];
-// CHECK-MESSAGES-DEFAULT: :[[@LINE-1]]:11: warning: possibly unsafe 'operator[]', consider bound-safe alternatives [cppcoreguidelines-pro-bounds-avoid-unchecked-container-accesses]
+// CHECK-MESSAGES-DEFAULT: :[[@LINE-1]]:11: warning: possibly unsafe 'operator[]', consider bounds-safe alternatives [cppcoreguidelines-pro-bounds-avoid-unchecked-container-accesses]
// CHECK-FIXES-AT: auto c = a.at(1+1);
// CHECK-FIXES-FUNC: auto c = f(a, 1+1);
constexpr int Index = 1;
auto d = a[Index];
-// CHECK-MESSAGES-DEFAULT: :[[@LINE-1]]:11: warning: possibly unsafe 'operator[]', consider bound-safe alternatives [cppcoreguidelines-pro-bounds-avoid-unchecked-container-accesses]
+// CHECK-MESSAGES-DEFAULT: :[[@LINE-1]]:11: warning: possibly unsafe 'operator[]', consider bounds-safe alternatives [cppcoreguidelines-pro-bounds-avoid-unchecked-container-accesses]
// CHECK-FIXES-AT: auto d = a.at(Index);
// CHECK-FIXES-FUNC: auto d = f(a, Index);
int e(int Ind) {
return a[Ind];
- // CHECK-MESSAGES-DEFAULT: :[[@LINE-1]]:11: warning: possibly unsafe 'operator[]', consider bound-safe alternatives [cppcoreguidelines-pro-bounds-avoid-unchecked-container-accesses]
+ // CHECK-MESSAGES-DEFAULT: :[[@LINE-1]]:11: warning: possibly unsafe 'operator[]', consider bounds-safe alternatives [cppcoreguidelines-pro-bounds-avoid-unchecked-container-accesses]
// CHECK-FIXES-AT: return a.at(Ind);
// CHECK-FIXES-FUNC: return f(a, Ind);
}
auto fa = (&a)->operator[](1);
-// CHECK-MESSAGES-DEFAULT: :[[@LINE-1]]:11: warning: possibly unsafe 'operator[]', consider bound-safe alternatives [cppcoreguidelines-pro-bounds-avoid-unchecked-container-accesses]
+// CHECK-MESSAGES-DEFAULT: :[[@LINE-1]]:11: warning: possibly unsafe 'operator[]', consider bounds-safe alternatives [cppcoreguidelines-pro-bounds-avoid-unchecked-container-accesses]
// CHECK-FIXES-AT: auto fa = (&a)->at(1);
// CHECK-FIXES-FUNC: auto fa = f(*(&a), 1);
auto fd = a.operator[](1);
-// CHECK-MESSAGES-DEFAULT: :[[@LINE-1]]:11: warning: possibly unsafe 'operator[]', consider bound-safe alternatives [cppcoreguidelines-pro-bounds-avoid-unchecked-container-accesses]
+// CHECK-MESSAGES-DEFAULT: :[[@LINE-1]]:11: warning: possibly unsafe 'operator[]', consider bounds-safe alternatives [cppcoreguidelines-pro-bounds-avoid-unchecked-container-accesses]
// CHECK-FIXES-AT: auto fd = a.at(1);
// CHECK-FIXES-FUNC: auto fd = f(a, 1);
//
auto fa23 = (&a)->operator[]();
-// CHECK-MESSAGES-DEFAULT: :[[@LINE-1]]:13: warning: possibly unsafe 'operator[]', consider bound-safe alternatives [cppcoreguidelines-pro-bounds-avoid-unchecked-container-accesses]
+// CHECK-MESSAGES-DEFAULT: :[[@LINE-1]]:13: warning: possibly unsafe 'operator[]', consider bounds-safe alternatives [cppcoreguidelines-pro-bounds-avoid-unchecked-container-accesses]
// CHECK-FIXES-AT: auto fa23 = (&a)->at();
// CHECK-FIXES-FUNC: auto fa23 = f(*(&a));
auto fd23 = a.operator[]();
-// CHECK-MESSAGES-DEFAULT: :[[@LINE-1]]:13: warning: possibly unsafe 'operator[]', consider bound-safe alternatives [cppcoreguidelines-pro-bounds-avoid-unchecked-container-accesses]
+// CHECK-MESSAGES-DEFAULT: :[[@LINE-1]]:13: warning: possibly unsafe 'operator[]', consider bounds-safe alternatives [cppcoreguidelines-pro-bounds-avoid-unchecked-container-accesses]
// CHECK-FIXES-AT: auto fd23 = a.at();
// CHECK-FIXES-FUNC: auto fd23 = f(a);
@@ -144,38 +144,38 @@ auto g = a.at(0);
std::unique_ptr<int> p;
auto q = p[0];
-// CHECK-MESSAGES-DEFAULT: :[[@LINE-1]]:11: warning: possibly unsafe 'operator[]', consider bound-safe alternatives [cppcoreguidelines-pro-bounds-avoid-unchecked-container-accesses]
+// CHECK-MESSAGES-DEFAULT: :[[@LINE-1]]:11: warning: possibly unsafe 'operator[]', consider bounds-safe alternatives [cppcoreguidelines-pro-bounds-avoid-unchecked-container-accesses]
// CHECK-FIXES-AT: auto q = p[0];
// CHECK-FIXES-FUNC: auto q = f(p, 0);
std::span<int> s;
auto t = s[0];
-// CHECK-MESSAGES-DEFAULT: :[[@LINE-1]]:11: warning: possibly unsafe 'operator[]', consider bound-safe alternatives [cppcoreguidelines-pro-bounds-avoid-unchecked-container-accesses]
+// CHECK-MESSAGES-DEFAULT: :[[@LINE-1]]:11: warning: possibly unsafe 'operator[]', consider bounds-safe alternatives [cppcoreguidelines-pro-bounds-avoid-unchecked-container-accesses]
// CHECK-FIXES-AT: auto t = s[0];
// CHECK-FIXES-FUNC: auto t = f(s, 0);
json::node<int> n;
auto m = n[0];
-// CHECK-MESSAGES-DEFAULT: :[[@LINE-1]]:11: warning: possibly unsafe 'operator[]', consider bound-safe alternatives [cppcoreguidelines-pro-bounds-avoid-unchecked-container-accesses]
+// CHECK-MESSAGES-DEFAULT: :[[@LINE-1]]:11: warning: possibly unsafe 'operator[]', consider bounds-safe alternatives [cppcoreguidelines-pro-bounds-avoid-unchecked-container-accesses]
// CHECK-FIXES-AT: auto m = n[0];
// CHECK-FIXES-FUNC: auto m = f(n, 0);
SubClass Sub;
auto r = Sub[0];
-// CHECK-MESSAGES-DEFAULT: :[[@LINE-1]]:13: warning: possibly unsafe 'operator[]', consider bound-safe alternatives [cppcoreguidelines-pro-bounds-avoid-unchecked-container-accesses]
+// CHECK-MESSAGES-DEFAULT: :[[@LINE-1]]:13: warning: possibly unsafe 'operator[]', consider bounds-safe alternatives [cppcoreguidelines-pro-bounds-avoid-unchecked-container-accesses]
// CHECK-FIXES-AT: auto r = Sub.at(0);
// CHECK-FIXES-FUNC: auto r = f(Sub, 0);
typedef std::array<int, 3> ar;
ar BehindDef;
auto u = BehindDef[0];
-// CHECK-MESSAGES-DEFAULT: :[[@LINE-1]]:19: warning: possibly unsafe 'operator[]', consider bound-safe alternatives [cppcoreguidelines-pro-bounds-avoid-unchecked-container-accesses]
+// CHECK-MESSAGES-DEFAULT: :[[@LINE-1]]:19: warning: possibly unsafe 'operator[]', consider bounds-safe alternatives [cppcoreguidelines-pro-bounds-avoid-unchecked-container-accesses]
// CHECK-FIXES-AT: auto u = BehindDef.at(0);
// CHECK-FIXES-FUNC: auto u = f(BehindDef, 0);
template<typename T> int TestTemplate(T t){
return t[0];
- // CHECK-MESSAGES-DEFAULT: :[[@LINE-1]]:10: warning: possibly unsafe 'operator[]', consider bound-safe alternatives [cppcoreguidelines-pro-bounds-avoid-unchecked-container-accesses]
+ // CHECK-MESSAGES-DEFAULT: :[[@LINE-1]]:10: warning: possibly unsafe 'operator[]', consider bounds-safe alternatives [cppcoreguidelines-pro-bounds-avoid-unchecked-container-accesses]
}
@@ -198,15 +198,15 @@ auto y = TestMap[0];
#define OBJECT_BEHIND_MACRO a
auto m1 = SUBSCRIPT_BEHIND_MACRO(0);
-// CHECK-MESSAGES-DEFAULT: :[[@LINE-1]]:11: warning: possibly unsafe 'operator[]', consider bound-safe alternatives [cppcoreguidelines-pro-bounds-avoid-unchecked-container-accesses]
+// CHECK-MESSAGES-DEFAULT: :[[@LINE-1]]:11: warning: possibly unsafe 'operator[]', consider bounds-safe alternatives [cppcoreguidelines-pro-bounds-avoid-unchecked-container-accesses]
auto m2 = a[ARG_BEHIND_MACRO];
-// CHECK-MESSAGES-DEFAULT: :[[@LINE-1]]:12: warning: possibly unsafe 'operator[]', consider bound-safe alternatives [cppcoreguidelines-pro-bounds-avoid-unchecked-container-accesses]
+// CHECK-MESSAGES-DEFAULT: :[[@LINE-1]]:12: warning: possibly unsafe 'operator[]', consider bounds-safe alternatives [cppcoreguidelines-pro-bounds-avoid-unchecked-container-accesses]
// CHECK-FIXES-AT: auto m2 = a.at(ARG_BEHIND_MACRO);
// CHECK-FIXES-FUNC: auto m2 = f(a, ARG_BEHIND_MACRO);
auto m3 = OBJECT_BEHIND_MACRO[0];
-// CHECK-MESSAGES-DEFAULT: :[[@LINE-1]]:30: warning: possibly unsafe 'operator[]', consider bound-safe alternatives [cppcoreguidelines-pro-bounds-avoid-unchecked-container-accesses]
+// CHECK-MESSAGES-DEFAULT: :[[@LINE-1]]:30: warning: possibly unsafe 'operator[]', consider bounds-safe alternatives [cppcoreguidelines-pro-bounds-avoid-unchecked-container-accesses]
// CHECK-FIXES-AT: auto m3 = OBJECT_BEHIND_MACRO.at(0);
// CHECK-FIXES-FUNC: auto m3 = f(OBJECT_BEHIND_MACRO, 0);
@@ -214,14 +214,14 @@ auto m3 = OBJECT_BEHIND_MACRO[0];
std::array<int , 3> longname;
auto z1 = longname [ 0 ] ;
-// CHECK-MESSAGES-DEFAULT: :[[@LINE-1]]:22: warning: possibly unsafe 'operator[]', consider bound-safe alternatives [cppcoreguidelines-pro-bounds-avoid-unchecked-container-accesses]
+// CHECK-MESSAGES-DEFAULT: :[[@LINE-1]]:22: warning: possibly unsafe 'operator[]', consider bounds-safe alternatives [cppcoreguidelines-pro-bounds-avoid-unchecked-container-accesses]
// CHECK-FIXES-AT: auto z1 = longname .at( 0 ) ;
// CHECK-FIXES-FUNC: auto z1 = f(longname , 0 ) ;
auto z2 = longname . operator[] ( 0 );
-// CHECK-MESSAGES-DEFAULT: :[[@LINE-1]]:11: warning: possibly unsafe 'operator[]', consider bound-safe alternatives [cppcoreguidelines-pro-bounds-avoid-unchecked-container-accesses]
+// CHECK-MESSAGES-DEFAULT: :[[@LINE-1]]:11: warning: possibly unsafe 'operator[]', consider bounds-safe alternatives [cppcoreguidelines-pro-bounds-avoid-unchecked-container-accesses]
// CHECK-FIXES-AT: auto z2 = longname . at ( 0 );
// CHECK-FIXES-FUNC: auto z2 = f(longname , 0 );
auto z3 = (&longname) -> operator[] ( 0 );
-// CHECK-MESSAGES-DEFAULT: :[[@LINE-1]]:11: warning: possibly unsafe 'operator[]', consider bound-safe alternatives [cppcoreguidelines-pro-bounds-avoid-unchecked-container-accesses]
+// CHECK-MESSAGES-DEFAULT: :[[@LINE-1]]:11: warning: possibly unsafe 'operator[]', consider bounds-safe alternatives [cppcoreguidelines-pro-bounds-avoid-unchecked-container-accesses]
// CHECK-FIXES-AT: auto z3 = (&longname) -> at ( 0 );
// CHECK-FIXES-FUNC: auto z3 = f(*(&longname) , 0 );
More information about the cfe-commits
mailing list