[clang-tools-extra] [clang-tidy] Create a check for signed and unsigned integers comparison (PR #113144)

[Julian Schmidt via cfe-commits]

================
@@ -0,0 +1,192 @@
+//===--- UseIntegerSignComparisonCheck.cpp - clang-tidy -------------------===//
+//
+// Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM Exceptions.
+// See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information.
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: Apache-2.0 WITH LLVM-exception
+//
+//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
+
+#include "UseIntegerSignComparisonCheck.h"
+#include "clang/AST/Expr.h"
+#include "clang/ASTMatchers/ASTMatchFinder.h"
+#include "clang/Lex/Lexer.h"
+
+using namespace clang::ast_matchers;
+using namespace clang::ast_matchers::internal;
+
+namespace clang::tidy::modernize {
+static BindableMatcher<clang::Stmt>
+intCastExpression(bool IsSigned, const std::string &CastBindName) {
+  auto IntTypeExpr = IsSigned ? expr(hasType(hasCanonicalType(
+                                    qualType(isInteger(), isSignedInteger()))))
+                              : expr(hasType(hasCanonicalType(qualType(
+                                    isInteger(), unless(isSignedInteger())))));
+
+  const auto ImplicitCastExpr =
+      implicitCastExpr(hasSourceExpression(IntTypeExpr)).bind(CastBindName);
+
+  const auto CStyleCastExpr = cStyleCastExpr(has(ImplicitCastExpr));
+  const auto StaticCastExpr = cxxStaticCastExpr(has(ImplicitCastExpr));
+  const auto FunctionalCastExpr = cxxFunctionalCastExpr(has(ImplicitCastExpr));
+
+  return expr(anyOf(ImplicitCastExpr, CStyleCastExpr, StaticCastExpr,
+                    FunctionalCastExpr));
+}
+
+static StringRef parseOpCode(BinaryOperator::Opcode Code) {
+  switch (Code) {
+  case BO_LT:
+    return "cmp_less";
+  case BO_GT:
+    return "cmp_greater";
+  case BO_LE:
+    return "cmp_less_equal";
+  case BO_GE:
+    return "cmp_greater_equal";
+  case BO_EQ:
+    return "cmp_equal";
+  case BO_NE:
+    return "cmp_not_equal";
+  default:
+    return "";
+  }
+}
+
+UseIntegerSignComparisonCheck::UseIntegerSignComparisonCheck(
+    StringRef Name, ClangTidyContext *Context)
+    : ClangTidyCheck(Name, Context),
+      IncludeInserter(Options.getLocalOrGlobal("IncludeStyle",
+                                               utils::IncludeSorter::IS_LLVM),
+                      areDiagsSelfContained()),
+      IsQtApplication(Options.get("IsQtApplication", false)) {}
+
+void UseIntegerSignComparisonCheck::storeOptions(
+    ClangTidyOptions::OptionMap &Opts) {
+  Options.store(Opts, "IncludeStyle", IncludeInserter.getStyle());
+  Options.store(Opts, "IsQtApplication", IsQtApplication);
+}
+
+void UseIntegerSignComparisonCheck::registerMatchers(MatchFinder *Finder) {
+  const auto SignedIntCastExpr = intCastExpression(true, "sIntCastExpression");
+  const auto UnSignedIntCastExpr =
+      intCastExpression(false, "uIntCastExpression");
+
+  // Flag all operators "==", "<=", ">=", "<", ">", "!="
+  // that are used between signed/unsigned
+  const auto CompareOperator =
+      binaryOperator(hasAnyOperatorName("==", "<=", ">=", "<", ">", "!="),
+                     hasOperands(SignedIntCastExpr, UnSignedIntCastExpr),
+                     unless(isInTemplateInstantiation()))
+          .bind("intComparison");
+
+  Finder->addMatcher(CompareOperator, this);
+}
+
+void UseIntegerSignComparisonCheck::registerPPCallbacks(
+    const SourceManager &SM, Preprocessor *PP, Preprocessor *ModuleExpanderPP) {
+  IncludeInserter.registerPreprocessor(PP);
+}
+
+void UseIntegerSignComparisonCheck::check(
+    const MatchFinder::MatchResult &Result) {
+  const auto *SignedCastExpression =
+      Result.Nodes.getNodeAs<ImplicitCastExpr>("sIntCastExpression");
+  const auto *UnSignedCastExpression =
+      Result.Nodes.getNodeAs<ImplicitCastExpr>("uIntCastExpression");
+  assert(SignedCastExpression);
+  assert(UnSignedCastExpression);
+
+  // Ignore the match if we know that the signed int value is not negative.
+  Expr::EvalResult EVResult;
+  if (!SignedCastExpression->isValueDependent() &&
+      SignedCastExpression->getSubExpr()->EvaluateAsInt(EVResult,
+                                                        *Result.Context)) {
+    const llvm::APSInt SValue = EVResult.Val.getInt();
+    if (SValue.isNonNegative())
+      return;
+  }
+
+  const auto *BinaryOp =
+      Result.Nodes.getNodeAs<BinaryOperator>("intComparison");
+  if (BinaryOp == nullptr)
+    return;
+
+  const BinaryOperator::Opcode OpCode = BinaryOp->getOpcode();
+  const Expr *LHS = BinaryOp->getLHS()->IgnoreParenImpCasts();
+  const Expr *RHS = BinaryOp->getRHS()->IgnoreParenImpCasts();
+  if (LHS == nullptr || RHS == nullptr)
+    return;
+
+  const Expr *ExplicitLHS = nullptr;
+  const Expr *ExplicitRHS = nullptr;
+  StringRef ExplicitLhsString, ExplicitLhsRhsString;
+
+  DiagnosticBuilder Diag =
+      diag(BinaryOp->getBeginLoc(),
+           "comparison between 'signed' and 'unsigned' integers");
+  if (BinaryOp->getLHS() == SignedCastExpression) {
+    ExplicitLHS = SignedCastExpression->isPartOfExplicitCast()
+                      ? SignedCastExpression
+                      : nullptr;
+    ExplicitRHS = UnSignedCastExpression->isPartOfExplicitCast()
+                      ? UnSignedCastExpression
+                      : nullptr;
+  } else {
+    ExplicitRHS = SignedCastExpression->isPartOfExplicitCast()
+                      ? SignedCastExpression
+                      : nullptr;
+    ExplicitLHS = UnSignedCastExpression->isPartOfExplicitCast()
+                      ? UnSignedCastExpression
+                      : nullptr;
+  }
+
+  if (!(getLangOpts().CPlusPlus17 && IsQtApplication) &&
+      !getLangOpts().CPlusPlus20)
+    return;
+
+  std::string CmpNamespace;
+  std::string CmpHeader;
+  if (getLangOpts().CPlusPlus20) {
+    CmpNamespace = std::string("std::") + std::string(parseOpCode(OpCode));
----------------
5chmidti wrote:

Use `Twine` instead: `("std::" + parseOpCode(OpCode)).str()` (+1 below)

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/113144