[clang] [clang-tools-extra] [analyzer][clang-tidy][NFC] Clean up eagerly-assume handling (PR #112209)

[Balazs Benics via cfe-commits]

=?utf-8?q?Donát?= Nagy <donat.nagy at ericsson.com>,
=?utf-8?q?Donát?= Nagy <donat.nagy at ericsson.com>,
=?utf-8?q?Donát?= Nagy <donat.nagy at ericsson.com>,
=?utf-8?q?Donát?= Nagy <donat.nagy at ericsson.com>
Message-ID:
In-Reply-To: <llvm.org/llvm/llvm-project/pull/112209 at github.com>


================
@@ -3767,28 +3764,26 @@ void ExprEngine::evalEagerlyAssumeBinOpBifurcation(ExplodedNodeSet &Dst,
       continue;
     }
 
-    ProgramStateRef state = Pred->getState();
-    SVal V = state->getSVal(Ex, Pred->getLocationContext());
+    ProgramStateRef State = Pred->getState();
+    SVal V = State->getSVal(Ex, Pred->getLocationContext());
     std::optional<nonloc::SymbolVal> SEV = V.getAs<nonloc::SymbolVal>();
     if (SEV && SEV->isExpression()) {
-      const std::pair<const ProgramPointTag *, const ProgramPointTag*> &tags =
-        geteagerlyAssumeBinOpBifurcationTags();
+      auto [TrueTag, FalseTag] = getEagerlyAssumeBifurcationTags();
 
-      ProgramStateRef StateTrue, StateFalse;
-      std::tie(StateTrue, StateFalse) = state->assume(*SEV);
+      auto [StateTrue, StateFalse] = State->assume(*SEV);
 
       // First assume that the condition is true.
       if (StateTrue) {
         SVal Val = svalBuilder.makeIntVal(1U, Ex->getType());
         StateTrue = StateTrue->BindExpr(Ex, Pred->getLocationContext(), Val);
-        Bldr.generateNode(Ex, Pred, StateTrue, tags.first);
+        Bldr.generateNode(Ex, Pred, StateTrue, TrueTag);
       }
 
       // Next, assume that the condition is false.
       if (StateFalse) {
         SVal Val = svalBuilder.makeIntVal(0U, Ex->getType());
         StateFalse = StateFalse->BindExpr(Ex, Pred->getLocationContext(), Val);
-        Bldr.generateNode(Ex, Pred, StateFalse, tags.second);
+        Bldr.generateNode(Ex, Pred, StateFalse, FalseTag);
----------------
steakhal wrote:

I'd be fine with having a different tag there. Actually, that would be really useful at times - e.g. with tooling around egraphs that is not present upstream. So having a tag is not an issue. Having a tag that lies about that we took an eager decision here is the problem. I agree that this shouldn't be done part of this PR. And I'm also fine leaving this alone in the future. I just wanted to raise this never the less.

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/112209