[clang] [clang-tools-extra] [analyzer][clang-tidy][NFC] Clean up eagerly-assume handling (PR #112209)

[Balazs Benics via cfe-commits]

=?utf-8?q?Donát?= Nagy <donat.nagy at ericsson.com>,
=?utf-8?q?Donát?= Nagy <donat.nagy at ericsson.com>,
=?utf-8?q?Donát?= Nagy <donat.nagy at ericsson.com>
Message-ID:
In-Reply-To: <llvm.org/llvm/llvm-project/pull/112209 at github.com>


================
@@ -3742,23 +3742,20 @@ void ExprEngine::evalLocation(ExplodedNodeSet &Dst,
   BldrTop.addNodes(Tmp);
 }
 
-std::pair<const ProgramPointTag *, const ProgramPointTag*>
-ExprEngine::geteagerlyAssumeBinOpBifurcationTags() {
-  static SimpleProgramPointTag
-         eagerlyAssumeBinOpBifurcationTrue(TagProviderName,
-                                           "Eagerly Assume True"),
-         eagerlyAssumeBinOpBifurcationFalse(TagProviderName,
-                                            "Eagerly Assume False");
-  return std::make_pair(&eagerlyAssumeBinOpBifurcationTrue,
-                        &eagerlyAssumeBinOpBifurcationFalse);
+std::pair<const ProgramPointTag *, const ProgramPointTag *>
+ExprEngine::getEagerlyAssumeBifurcationTags() {
+  static SimpleProgramPointTag TrueTag(TagProviderName, "Eagerly Assume True"),
+      FalseTag(TagProviderName, "Eagerly Assume False");
+
+  return std::make_pair(&TrueTag, &FalseTag);
----------------
steakhal wrote:

I'd prefer class static const members for the tags over a function like this.

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/112209