[clang] [clang] Catch missing format attributes (PR #105479)

[Vlad Serebrennikov via cfe-commits]

================
@@ -0,0 +1,251 @@
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -fsyntax-only -verify=expected,c_diagnostics -Wmissing-format-attribute %s
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -fsyntax-only -Wmissing-format-attribute -fdiagnostics-parseable-fixits %s 2>&1 | FileCheck %s
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -fsyntax-only -x c++ -verify=expected,cpp_diagnostics -Wmissing-format-attribute %s
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -fsyntax-only -x c++ -verify=expected,cpp_diagnostics -std=c++2b -Wmissing-format-attribute %s
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -fsyntax-only -x c++ -verify=expected,cpp_diagnostics -std=c++23 -Wmissing-format-attribute %s
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -fsyntax-only -x c++ -Wmissing-format-attribute -fdiagnostics-parseable-fixits %s 2>&1 | FileCheck %s
+
+#ifndef __cplusplus
+typedef __CHAR16_TYPE__ char16_t;
+typedef __CHAR32_TYPE__ char32_t;
+typedef __WCHAR_TYPE__ wchar_t;
+#endif
+
+typedef __SIZE_TYPE__ size_t;
+typedef __builtin_va_list va_list;
+
+__attribute__((__format__(__printf__, 1, 2)))
+int printf(const char *, ...); // #printf
+
+__attribute__((__format__(__scanf__, 1, 2)))
+int scanf(const char *, ...); // #scanf
+
+__attribute__((__format__(__printf__, 1, 0)))
+int vprintf(const char *, va_list); // #vprintf
+
+__attribute__((__format__(__scanf__, 1, 0)))
+int vscanf(const char *, va_list); // #vscanf
+
+__attribute__((__format__(__printf__, 2, 0)))
+int vsprintf(char *, const char *, va_list); // #vsprintf
+
+__attribute__((__format__(__printf__, 3, 0)))
+int vsnprintf(char *ch, size_t, const char *, va_list); // #vsnprintf
+
+#ifndef __cplusplus
+int vwscanf(const wchar_t *, va_list); // #vwscanf
+#endif
+
+__attribute__((__format__(__scanf__, 1, 4)))
+void f1(char *out, const size_t len, const char *format, ... /* args */) // #f1
+{
+    va_list args;
+    vsnprintf(out, len, format, args); // expected-no-warning@#f1
----------------
Endilll wrote:

> It seems that `-verify` does not handle 'expected-no-warning' comment, so I disabled this comment.

It doesn't need to. If there's no expected directive on the line, it is interpreted as if you're putting a hypothetical `expected-no-warning` there.
If you wanted to make it clear for human readers, you can leave something along the lines of `// OK` on that line.

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/105479