[clang] [clang][bytecode] Don't produce a null type when checking new exprs (PR #110252)

[via cfe-commits]

llvmbot wrote:


<!--LLVM PR SUMMARY COMMENT-->

@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang

Author: Timm Baeder (tbaederr)

<details>
<summary>Changes</summary>

getType() might give us the right type already, so use that instead of calling getPointeeType() for all CXXNewExprs.

---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/110252.diff


2 Files Affected:

- (modified) clang/lib/AST/ByteCode/Interp.cpp (+2-1) 
- (modified) clang/test/AST/ByteCode/placement-new.cpp (+15) 


``````````diff
diff --git a/clang/lib/AST/ByteCode/Interp.cpp b/clang/lib/AST/ByteCode/Interp.cpp
index c43f64901909ce..798e0f3e96fa09 100644
--- a/clang/lib/AST/ByteCode/Interp.cpp
+++ b/clang/lib/AST/ByteCode/Interp.cpp
@@ -1322,7 +1322,8 @@ bool CheckNewTypeMismatch(InterpState &S, CodePtr OpPC, const Expr *E,
   const auto *NewExpr = cast<CXXNewExpr>(E);
   QualType StorageType = Ptr.getType();
 
-  if (isa_and_nonnull<CXXNewExpr>(Ptr.getFieldDesc()->asExpr())) {
+  if (isa_and_nonnull<CXXNewExpr>(Ptr.getFieldDesc()->asExpr()) &&
+      StorageType->isPointerType()) {
     // FIXME: Are there other cases where this is a problem?
     StorageType = StorageType->getPointeeType();
   }
diff --git a/clang/test/AST/ByteCode/placement-new.cpp b/clang/test/AST/ByteCode/placement-new.cpp
index 1ff6ff3ac19223..caf3ac97fd1c04 100644
--- a/clang/test/AST/ByteCode/placement-new.cpp
+++ b/clang/test/AST/ByteCode/placement-new.cpp
@@ -271,3 +271,18 @@ namespace ConstructAt {
                                           // both-note {{in call}}
 
 }
+
+namespace UsedToCrash {
+  struct S {
+      int* i;
+      constexpr S() : i(new int(42)) {} // #no-deallocation
+      constexpr ~S() {delete i;}
+  };
+  consteval void alloc() {
+      S* s = new S();
+      s->~S();
+      new (s) S();
+      delete s;
+  }
+  int alloc1 = (alloc(), 0);
+}

``````````

</details>


https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/110252