[clang] [Clang][AArch64] Fix checkArmStreamingBuiltin for 'sve-b16b16' (PR #109420)
Paul Walker via cfe-commits
cfe-commits at lists.llvm.org
Fri Sep 20 07:18:10 PDT 2024
================
@@ -567,23 +567,28 @@ static bool checkArmStreamingBuiltin(Sema &S, CallExpr *TheCall,
// * When compiling for SVE only, the caller must be in non-streaming mode.
// * When compiling for both SVE and SME, the caller can be in either mode.
if (BuiltinType == SemaARM::VerifyRuntimeMode) {
- auto DisableFeatures = [](llvm::StringMap<bool> &Map, StringRef S) {
- for (StringRef K : Map.keys())
- if (K.starts_with(S))
- Map[K] = false;
- };
-
llvm::StringMap<bool> CallerFeatureMapWithoutSVE;
S.Context.getFunctionFeatureMap(CallerFeatureMapWithoutSVE, FD);
- DisableFeatures(CallerFeatureMapWithoutSVE, "sve");
+ CallerFeatureMapWithoutSVE["sve"] = false;
+ CallerFeatureMapWithoutSVE["sve2"] = false;
+ CallerFeatureMapWithoutSVE["sve2p1"] = false;
+ // FIXME: This list must be updated with future extensions, because when
+ // an intrinsic is enabled by (sve2p1|sme2p1), disabling just "sve" is
+ // not sufficient, as the feature dependences are not resolved.
+ // At the moment, it should be sufficient to test the 'base' architectural
+ // support for SVE and SME, which must always be provided in the
+ // target guard. e.g. TargetGuard = "sve-b16b16" without "sme" or "sve"
+ // is not sufficient.
----------------
paulwalker-arm wrote:
It would be better to add code (SVEEmitter?) to parse the target guards to ensure there is at least one of the required SVE and SME features referenced. This should references this code as something to update if the intent really is to add a new "base" option.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/109420
More information about the cfe-commits
mailing list