[clang] [Clang] Add [[clang::no_specializations]] (PR #101469)

[Nikolas Klauser via cfe-commits]

philnik777 wrote:

> > I did think about it more, and I think it would be more consistent to support the attribute on any sort of specializable entity, including functions - regardless of STL needs @AaronBallman @ldionne
> 
> Agreed; if we're adding a custom attribute, we might as well support it in a general form so users can also make use of it for their needs (which may be different than STL needs).

While I don't see much of a use-case for functions, I also don't see much of a downside (assuming implementing the attribute is as simple for functions as it is for variables and classes). Is there anything else that can be specialized?


https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/101469