[clang] [analyzer] Detect leaks of stack addresses via output params, indirect globals 3/3 (PR #105648)

[Arseniy Zaostrovnykh via cfe-commits]

================
@@ -369,24 +393,48 @@ void StackAddrEscapeChecker::checkEndFunction(const ReturnStmt *RS,
 
       const auto *ReferrerStackSpace =
           ReferrerMemSpace->getAs<StackSpaceRegion>();
+
       if (!ReferrerStackSpace)
         return false;
 
-      if (ReferredMemSpace->getStackFrame() == PoppedFrame &&
-          ReferrerStackSpace->getStackFrame()->isParentOf(PoppedFrame)) {
+      if (const auto *ReferredFrame = ReferredMemSpace->getStackFrame();
+          ReferredFrame != PoppedFrame) {
+        return false;
+      }
+
+      if (ReferrerStackSpace->getStackFrame()->isParentOf(PoppedFrame)) {
+        V.emplace_back(Referrer, Referred);
+        return true;
+      }
+      if (isa<StackArgumentsSpaceRegion>(ReferrerMemSpace) &&
+          ReferrerStackSpace->getStackFrame() == PoppedFrame && TopFrame) {
+        // Output parameter of a top-level function
         V.emplace_back(Referrer, Referred);
         return true;
       }
       return false;
     }
 
+    void updateInvalidatedRegions(const MemRegion *Region) {
+      if (const auto *SymReg = Region->getAs<SymbolicRegion>()) {
+        SymbolRef Symbol = SymReg->getSymbol();
+        if (const auto *DerS = dyn_cast<SymbolDerived>(Symbol);
+            DerS && isa_and_nonnull<SymbolConjured>(DerS->getParentSymbol())) {
+          InvalidatedRegions.insert(Symbol->getOriginRegion()->getBaseRegion());
+        }
+      }
+    }
----------------
necto wrote:

Renamed as `ExcludedRegions` in 9075f2e1687d
Is it clear with the new name that the checker does not do any invalidation?

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/105648