[clang] [NFC] Fix an incorrect comment about operator precedence. (PR #105784)

[via cfe-commits]

llvmbot wrote:


<!--LLVM PR SUMMARY COMMENT-->

@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang

Author: Michael Park (mpark)

<details>
<summary>Changes</summary>

The comment talks about left-associative operators twice, when the latter mention is actually describing right-associative operators.

---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/105784.diff


1 Files Affected:

- (modified) clang/lib/Parse/ParseExpr.cpp (+1-1) 


``````````diff
diff --git a/clang/lib/Parse/ParseExpr.cpp b/clang/lib/Parse/ParseExpr.cpp
index 1405aef700bec5..64f284d78b24db 100644
--- a/clang/lib/Parse/ParseExpr.cpp
+++ b/clang/lib/Parse/ParseExpr.cpp
@@ -607,7 +607,7 @@ Parser::ParseRHSOfBinaryExpression(ExprResult LHS, prec::Level MinPrec) {
         RHS = ExprError();
       }
       // If this is left-associative, only parse things on the RHS that bind
-      // more tightly than the current operator.  If it is left-associative, it
+      // more tightly than the current operator.  If it is right-associative, it
       // is okay, to bind exactly as tightly.  For example, compile A=B=C=D as
       // A=(B=(C=D)), where each paren is a level of recursion here.
       // The function takes ownership of the RHS.

``````````

</details>


https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/105784