[clang] 660de53 - [NFC] Fix a typo in InternalsManual: ActOnCXX -> ActOnXXX (#105207)

[via cfe-commits]

Author: Michael Park
Date: 2024-08-20T13:00:51-07:00
New Revision: 660de533a23485eec4c5f8d3d88f9dd53497bcf8

URL: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/660de533a23485eec4c5f8d3d88f9dd53497bcf8
DIFF: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/660de533a23485eec4c5f8d3d88f9dd53497bcf8.diff

LOG: [NFC] Fix a typo in InternalsManual: ActOnCXX -> ActOnXXX (#105207)

This part of the manual describes uses of `ActOnXXX` and `BuildXXX`.

Added: 
    

Modified: 
    clang/docs/InternalsManual.rst

Removed: 
    


################################################################################
diff  --git a/clang/docs/InternalsManual.rst b/clang/docs/InternalsManual.rst
index 3d21e37784b36..b70ec35f3da22 100644
--- a/clang/docs/InternalsManual.rst
+++ b/clang/docs/InternalsManual.rst
@@ -3200,7 +3200,7 @@ are similar.
    always involve two functions: an ``ActOnXXX`` function that will be called
    directly from the parser, and a ``BuildXXX`` function that performs the
    actual semantic analysis and will (eventually!) build the AST node.  It's
-   fairly common for the ``ActOnCXX`` function to do very little (often just
+   fairly common for the ``ActOnXXX`` function to do very little (often just
    some minor translation from the parser's representation to ``Sema``'s
    representation of the same thing), but the separation is still important:
    C++ template instantiation, for example, should always call the ``BuildXXX``