[clang] nonblocking/nonallocating attributes: 2nd pass caller/callee analysis (PR #99656)
Doug Wyatt via cfe-commits
cfe-commits at lists.llvm.org
Mon Aug 19 14:04:59 PDT 2024
================
@@ -0,0 +1,256 @@
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -fsyntax-only -fblocks -fcxx-exceptions -std=c++20 -verify %s
+// These are in a separate file because errors (e.g. incompatible attributes) currently prevent
+// the FXAnalysis pass from running at all.
+
+// This diagnostic is re-enabled and exercised in isolation later in this file.
+#pragma clang diagnostic ignored "-Wperf-constraint-implies-noexcept"
+
+// --- CONSTRAINTS ---
+
+void nb1() [[clang::nonblocking]]
+{
+ int *pInt = new int; // expected-warning {{'nonblocking' function must not allocate or deallocate memory}}
+ delete pInt; // expected-warning {{'nonblocking' function must not allocate or deallocate memory}}
+}
+
+void nb2() [[clang::nonblocking]]
+{
+ static int global; // expected-warning {{'nonblocking' function must not have static locals}}
+}
+
+void nb3() [[clang::nonblocking]]
+{
+ try {
+ throw 42; // expected-warning {{'nonblocking' function must not throw or catch exceptions}}
+ }
+ catch (...) { // expected-warning {{'nonblocking' function must not throw or catch exceptions}}
+ }
+}
+
----------------
dougsonos wrote:
Also once "member initializer" is carved out for special treatment, there are other possible implicit function calls in the AST that might deserve more precise attribution, e.g. invocation of constructors and destructors for a local variable.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/99656
More information about the cfe-commits
mailing list