[clang-tools-extra] [clang-tidy] Create bugprone-incorrect-enable-shared-from-this check (PR #102299)
Piotr Zegar via cfe-commits
cfe-commits at lists.llvm.org
Thu Aug 15 14:56:36 PDT 2024
================
@@ -0,0 +1,120 @@
+//===--- IncorrectEnableSharedFromThisCheck.cpp - clang-tidy --------------===//
+//
+// Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM Exceptions.
+// See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information.
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: Apache-2.0 WITH LLVM-exception
+//
+//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
+
+#include "IncorrectEnableSharedFromThisCheck.h"
+#include "clang/AST/ASTContext.h"
+#include "clang/AST/DeclCXX.h"
+#include "clang/AST/RecursiveASTVisitor.h"
+#include "clang/ASTMatchers/ASTMatchFinder.h"
+#include "clang/Basic/Specifiers.h"
+#include "llvm/ADT/SmallPtrSet.h"
+
+using namespace clang::ast_matchers;
+
+namespace clang::tidy::bugprone {
+
+void IncorrectEnableSharedFromThisCheck::registerMatchers(MatchFinder *Finder) {
+ Finder->addMatcher(translationUnitDecl(), this);
+}
+
+void IncorrectEnableSharedFromThisCheck::check(
+ const MatchFinder::MatchResult &Result) {
+
+ class Visitor : public RecursiveASTVisitor<Visitor> {
+ IncorrectEnableSharedFromThisCheck &Check;
+ llvm::SmallPtrSet<const CXXRecordDecl *, 16> EnableSharedClassSet;
+
+ public:
+ explicit Visitor(IncorrectEnableSharedFromThisCheck &Check)
+ : Check(Check) {}
+
+ bool VisitCXXRecordDecl(CXXRecordDecl *RDecl) {
+ for (const auto &Base : RDecl->bases()) {
+ VisitCXXBaseSpecifier(Base, RDecl);
+ }
+ for (const auto &Base : RDecl->bases()) {
+ const CXXRecordDecl *BaseType = Base.getType()->getAsCXXRecordDecl();
+ if (BaseType && BaseType->getQualifiedNameAsString() ==
+ "std::enable_shared_from_this") {
+ EnableSharedClassSet.insert(RDecl->getCanonicalDecl());
+ return true;
+ }
+ }
+ return true;
+ }
+
+ bool VisitCXXBaseSpecifier(const CXXBaseSpecifier &Base,
+ CXXRecordDecl *RDecl) {
+ const CXXRecordDecl *BaseType = Base.getType()->getAsCXXRecordDecl();
+ const clang::AccessSpecifier AccessSpec = Base.getAccessSpecifier();
+
+ if (BaseType &&
+ BaseType->getQualifiedNameAsString() == "enable_shared_from_this") {
+ if (AccessSpec == clang::AS_public) {
+ const SourceLocation InsertLocation = Base.getBaseTypeLoc();
+ const FixItHint Hint = FixItHint::CreateInsertion(InsertLocation, "std::");
+ Check.diag(RDecl->getLocation(),
+ "Should be std::enable_shared_from_this",
+ DiagnosticIDs::Warning)
+ << Hint;
+
+ } else {
+ const SourceRange ReplacementRange = Base.getSourceRange();
+ const std::string ReplacementString =
+ "public std::" + Base.getType().getAsString();
+ const FixItHint Hint =
+ FixItHint::CreateReplacement(ReplacementRange, ReplacementString);
+ Check.diag(
+ RDecl->getLocation(),
+ "Should be std::enable_shared_from_this and "
+ "inheritance from std::enable_shared_from_this should be public "
+ "inheritance, otherwise the internal weak_ptr won't be "
----------------
PiotrZSL wrote:
noneone care/know about "internal weak_ptr, write how it would behave from user perspective, start with lower caps.
For me this is too long. it should say: whats wrong (+why it's wrong), how to fix (+why fix)
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/102299
More information about the cfe-commits
mailing list